The Power of Optimization Over Randomization in Designing Experiments Involving Small Samples

References

• Eddington SE, Onghena P (2007) Randomization Tests, Fourth ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher A (1935) The Design of Experiments (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, UK).Google Scholar
• Greevy R, Lu B, Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR (2004) Optimal multivariate matching before randomization. Biostatistics 5(2):263–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaibel V, Peinhardt M, Pfetsch M (2011) Orbitopal fixing. Discrete Optim. 8(4):595–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallus N (2014) Optimal A Priori Balance in the Design of Controlled Ex-periments. Accessed October 14, 2014, http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.0531.Google Scholar
• Karmarkar N, Karp R (1982) Differencing Method of Set Partitioning. Technical Report CSD-83-113, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
• Karmarkar N, Karp R, Lueker G, Odlyzko A (1986) Probabilistic analysis of optimum partitioning. J. Appl. Probab. 23(3):626–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mertens S (2001) A physicist’s approach to number partitioning. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 265(1):79–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris C (1979) A finite selection model for experimental design of the health insurance study. J. Econom. 11(1):43–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan K, Rubin D (2012) Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments. Ann. Statist. 40(2):1263–1282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin D (1979) Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74(366):318–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin D (1980) Comment: Randomization analysis of experimental data: The Fisher randomization test. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75(371): 591–593.Google Scholar
• Rubin D (1986) Comment: Which ifs have causal answers. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81(396):961–962.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin D (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Amer. Statistician 39(1):33–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheldon TE (1988) Mathematical Models in Cancer Research (Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK).Google Scholar