Multistate Bayesian Control Chart Over a Finite Horizon

References

• Altiok T (1985) On the phase-type approximations of general distributions. IIE Trans. 17:110–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M (1965) Optimal control of partially observable Markovian systems. J. Franklin Inst. 280:367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astrom K (1965) Optimal control of Markov processes with incomplete state information. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 10:174–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayer T, Alagoz O, Stout NK (2012) A POMDP approach to personalize mammography screening decisions. Oper. Res. 60(5):1019–1034.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsekas D (1976) Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Control (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Calabrese J (1995) Bayesian process control for attributes. Management Sci. 41(4):637–645.Link, Google Scholar
• Celano G, Costa A, Fichera S, Trovato E (2009) An efficient genetic-dynamic programming procedure to design Bayesian control charts. Internat. J. Quality Reliability Management 26:831–848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiu W (1976) Economic design of np charts for processes subject to a multiplicity of assignable causes. Management Sci. 23(4):404–411.Link, Google Scholar
• Dayanik S, Goulding C, Poor H (2008) Bayesian sequential change diagnosis. Math. Oper. Res. 33(2):475–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Duncan A (1971) The economic design of X¯ charts when there is a multiplicity of assignable causes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66:107–121.Google Scholar
• Girshick M, Rubin H (1952) A Bayes’ approach to a quality control model. Ann. Math. Statist. 23:114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy V (2011) Bayesian sequential detection with phase-distributed change time and nonlinear penalty—A lattice programming approach. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 57:7096–7124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy W (1987a) On the convexity of policy regions in partially observed systems. Oper. Res. 35(4):619–621.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy W (1987b) Some monotonicity results for partially observed Markov decision processes. Oper. Res. 35(5):736–742.Link, Google Scholar
• Maillart L, Zheltova L (2007) Structured maintenance policies on interior sample paths. Naval Res. Logist. 54:645–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maillart L, Ivy JS, Ransom S, Diehl K (2008) Assessing dynamic breast cancer screening policies. Oper. Res. 56(6):1411–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Makis V (2008) Multivariate Bayesian control chart. Oper. Res. 56(2): 487–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Makis V (2009) Multivariate Bayesian process control for a finite production run. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 194:795–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCulloh I, Carley KM (2011) Detecting change in longitudinal social networks. J. Soc. Structure 12(3):1–37.Google Scholar
• Monahan GE (1982) A survey of partially observable Markov decision processes: Theory, models and algorithms. Management Sci. 18(4):362–380.Google Scholar
• Nenes G (2013) Optimisation of fully adaptive Bayesian charts for infinite-horizon processes. Internat. J. Systems Sci. 44:289–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nenes G, Tagaras G (2007) The economically designed two-sided Bayesian x¯ control chart. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183:263–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neuts M (1981) Matrix-Geometric Solution in Stochastic Models (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Poor HV, Hadjiliadis O (2009) Quickest Detection (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Porteus E, Angelus A (1997) Opportunities for improved statistical process control. Management Sci. 43(9):1214–1228.Link, Google Scholar
• Reis BY, Pagano M, Mandl KD (2002) Using temporal context to improve biosurveillance. Proc. National. Acad. Sci. 100:1961–1965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenfield D (1976) Markovian deterioration with uncertain information. Oper. Res. 24(1):141–155.Link, Google Scholar
• Ross S (1971) Quality control under Markovian deterioration. Management Sci. 17(9):587–596.Link, Google Scholar
• Shewhart W (1931) Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product (Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Smallwood RD, Sondik E (1973) The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes over a finite horizon. Oper. Res. 21(5): 1071–1088.Link, Google Scholar
• Tagaras G (1994) A dynamic programming approach to the economic design of X¯-charts. IIE Trans. 26:48–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tagaras G (1996) Dynamic control charts for finite production runs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 91:38–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tagaras G, Nikolaidis Y (2002) Comparing the effectiveness of various Bayesian X control charts. Oper. Res. 50(5):878–888.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor H (1965) Markovian sequential replacement processes. Ann. Math. Statist. 36:1677–1694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor H (1967) Statistical control of a Gaussian process. Technometrics 9:29–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Hee K (1978) Bayesian Control of Markov Chains (Mathematical Centre Tract 95, Amsterdam, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Wang J, Lee CG (2013) Bayesian process control with multiple assignable causes. Working paper, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
• White C (1976) Applications of two inequality results for concave functions to a stochastic optimization problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 55: 347–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White C (1977) A Markov quality control process subject to partial observation. Management Sci. 23(8):843–852.Link, Google Scholar
• Yeh RH (1996) Optimal inspection and replacement policies for multi-state deteriorating systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 96:248–259.Crossref, Google Scholar