Dynamic Forecasting and Control Algorithms of Glaucoma Progression for Clinician Decision Support

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2015.1405

References

  • Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2004) The optimal timing of living-donor liver transplantation. Management Sci. 50(10):1420–1430.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alliance for Aging Research (2011) The economic burden of vision loss. Accessed September 1, 2011, http://www.silverbook.org/browse.php?id=84.Google Scholar
  • American Academy of Ophthalmology Glaucoma Panel (2010) Preferred practice pattern guidelines. Accessed January 10, 2011, http://www.aao.org/ppp.Google Scholar
  • Antelman GR, Savage IR (1965) Surveillance problems: Wiener processes. Naval Res. Logist. 12(1):35–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athans M (1972) On the determination of optimal costly measurement strategies for linear stochastic systems. Automatica 8(4):397–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ayer T, Alagoz O, Stout NK (2012) OR forum: A POMDP approach to personalize mammography screening decisions. Oper. Res. 60(5):1019–1034.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker RD (1998) Use of a mathematical model to evaluate breast cancer screening policy. Health Care Management Sci. 1(2):103–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barlow RE, Hunter LC, Proschan F (1963) Optimum checking procedures. J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 11(4):1078–1095.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barlow RE, Proschan F, Hunter LC (1996) Mathematical Theory of Reliability (Society for Industrial Mathematics, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bengtsson B, Patella VM, Heijl A (2009) Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Arch. Ophthalmology 127(12):1610–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bensing J (2000) Bridging the gap: The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Ed. Counseling 39(1):17–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP (1987) Dynamic Programming: Deterministic and Stochastic Models (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP (2000a) Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Third ed., Vol. 1 (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP (2000b) Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Vol. 2 (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bloch-Mercier S (2002) A preventive maintenance policy with sequential checking procedure for a Markov deteriorating system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 142(3):548–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burr JM, Kilonzo M, Vale L, Ryan M (2007) Developing a preference-based glaucoma utility index using a discrete choice experiment. Optometry Vision Sci. 84(8):E797–E809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Chronic disease prevention and health promotion. Accessed February 1, 2014, http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/.Google Scholar
  • Chew V (1966) Confidence, prediction, and tolerance regions for the multivariate normal distribution. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 61(315):605–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chhatwal J, Alagoz O, Burnside ES (2010) Optimal breast biopsy decision making based on mammographic features and demographic factors. Oper. Res. 58(6):1577–1591.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chitgopekar SS (1974) A note on the costly surveillance of a stochastic system. Naval Res. Logist. 21(2):365–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choplin NT, Edwards RP (1999) Visual Field Testing with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Text and Clinical Atlas (Slack, Thorofare, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, McNaught AI, Edgar DF, Hitchings RA (1997) Improving the prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma using spatial processing. Ophthalmology 104(3):517–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D’Amato RM, D’Aquila RT, Wein LM (2000) Management of antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection: Analyzing when to change therapy. Management Sci. 46(9):1200–1213.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Day NE, Walter SD (1984) Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: Estimation procedures from mass screening programmes. Biometrics 40(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Moraes CG, Juthani VJ, Liebmann JM, Teng CC, Tello C, Susanna R Jr, Ritch R (2011) Risk factors for visual field progression in treated glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmology 129(5):562–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denton BT, Alagoz O, Holder A, Lee EK (2011) Medical decision making: Open research challenges. IIE Trans. Healthcare Systems Engrg. 1(3):161–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denton BT, Kurt M, Shah ND, Bryant SC, Smith SA (2009) Optimizing the start time of statin therapy for patients with diabetes. Medical Decision Making 29(3):351–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derman C, Sacks J (1960) Replacement of periodically inspected equipment. (An optimal optional stopping rule). Naval Res. Logist. 7(4):597–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diaz-Aleman VT, Anton A, de la Rosa MG, Johnson ZK, McLeod S, Azuara-Blanco A (2009) Detection of visual-field deterioration by glaucoma progression analysis and threshold noiseless trend programs. British J. Ophthalmology 93(3):322–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Digalakis V, Rohlicek JR, Ostendorf M (1993) ML estimation of a stochastic linear system with the EM algorithm and its application to speech recognition. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing 1(4):431–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donelson J (1977) Cost model for testing program based on nonhomogeneous Poisson failure model. IEEE Trans. Reliability 26(3):189–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckles JE (1968) Optimum maintenance with incomplete information. Oper. Res. 16(5):1058–1067.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fowler FJ, Wennberg JE, Timothy RP, Barry MJ, Mulley AG, Hanley D (1988) Symptom status and quality of life following prostatectomy. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 259(20):3018–3022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O’Colmain BJ, Klein BE, Taylor HR, West S, Leske MC, Mitchell P, Congdon N, Kempen J (2004) Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch. Ophthalmology 122(4):532–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fung SSM, Lemer C, Russell RA, Malik R, Crabb DP (2013) Are practical recommendations practiced? A national multi-centre cross-sectional study on frequency of visual field testing in glaucoma. British J. Ophthalmology 97(7):843–847.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gardiner SK, Demirel S (2008) Assessment of patient opinions of different clinical tests used in the management of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 115(12):2127–2131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghahramani Z, Hinton GE (1996) Parameter estimation for linear dynamical systems. University of Toronto Technical Report CRG-TR-96-26.Google Scholar
  • Glen FC, Baker H, Crabb DP (2014) A qualitative investigation into patients views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring. BMJ Open 4(1):e003996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanin AD, Yakovlev AY (2001) Optimal schedules of cancer surveillance and tumor size at detection. Math. Comput. Model. 33(12–13):1419–1430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hodapp E, Parrish II RK, Anderson DR, Perkins TW (1993) Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma (Mosby, St. Louis).Google Scholar
  • Hu C, Lovejoy WS, Shafer SL (1996) Comparison of some suboptimal control policies in medical drug therapy. Oper. Res. 44(5):696–709.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jansonius NM (2006) Towards an optimal perimetric strategy for progression detection in glaucoma: From fixed-space to adaptive inter-test intervals. Graefe’s Arch. Clinical Experiment. Ophthalmology 244(3):390–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jansonius NM (2007) Progression detection in glaucoma can be made more efficient by using a variable interval between successive visual field tests. Graefe’s Arch. Clinical Experiment. Ophthalmology 245(11):1647–1651.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J. Basic Engrg. 82(1):35–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kander Z (1978) Inspection policies for deteriorating equipment characterized by N quality levels. Naval Res. Logist. 25(2):243–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kander Z, Raviv A (1974) Maintenance policies when failure distribution of equipment is only partially known. Naval Res. Logist. 21(3):419–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz J (1999) Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology 106(2):391–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller JB (1974) Optimum checking schedules for systems subject to random failure. Management Sci. 21(3):256–260.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirch RLA, Klein M (1974) Surveillance schedules for medical examinations. Management Sci. 20(10):1403–1409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lafortune S (1985) On Stochastic Optimal Control Problems with Selection Among Different Costly Observations ((Memorandum) Electronics Res Lab, COE, University of California, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  • Lavieri MS, Puterman ML, Tyldesley S, Morris WJ (2012) When to treat prostate cancer patients based on their PSA dynamics. IIE Trans. Healthcare Systems Engrg. 2(1):62–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee EK, Wu TL (2009) Classification and disease prediction via mathematical programming. Handbook of Optimization in Medicine (Springer, New York), 1–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee CP, Chertow GM, Zenios SA (2008) Optimal initiation and management of dialysis therapy. Oper. Res. 56(6):1428–1449.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee PP, Walt JW, Rosenblatt LC, Siegartel LR, Stern LS (2007b) Association between intraocular pressure variation and glaucoma progression: Data from a United States chart review. Amer. J. Ophthalmology 144(6):901–907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee PP, Levin LA, Walt JG, Chiang T, Katz LM, Dolgitser M, Doyle JJ, Stern LS (2007a) Cost of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: A retrospective study of commercial insurance claims data. Ophthalmology 114(7):1241–1247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee PP, Walt JG, Doyle JJ, Kotak SV, Evans SJ, Budenz DL, Chen PPet al. (2006) A multicenter, retrospective pilot study of resource use and costs associated with severity of disease in glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmology 124(1):12–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln TL, Weiss GH (1964) A statistical evaluation of recurrent medical examinations. Oper. Res. 12(2):187–205.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luss H (1976) Maintenance policies when deterioration can be observed by inspections. Oper. Res. 24(2):359–366.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luss H (1983) An inspection policy model for production facilities. Management Sci. 29(9):1102–1109.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maillart LM, Ivy JS, Ransom S, Diehl K (2008) Assessing dynamic breast cancer screening policies. Oper. Res. 56(6):1411–1427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McNaught AI, Hitchings RA, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW (1995) Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefe’s Arch. Clinical Experiment. Ophthalmology 233(12):750–755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehra RK (1976) Optimization of measurement schedules and sensor designs for linear dynamic systems. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 21(1):55–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meier III L, Peschon J, Dressler R (1967) Optimal control of measurement subsystems. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 12(5):528–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michaelson JS, Halpern E, Kopans DB (1999) Breast cancer: Computer simulation method for estimating optimal intervals for screening. Radiology 212(2):551–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mine H, Kawai H (1975) An optimal inspection and replacement policy. IEEE Trans. Reliability 24(5):305–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morey RC (1966) Some stochastic properties of a compound-renewal damage model. Oper. Res. 14(5):902–908.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Munford AG, Shahani AK (1972) A nearly optimal inspection policy. Oper. Res. Quart. 23(3):373–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy K (1998) Kalman Filter Toolbox for Matlab (Comp Sci and AI Lab., MIT, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR, Niziol LM, Janz NK (2009) CIGTS study investigators. Visual field progression in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors. Ophthalmology 116(2):200–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Niziol LM, Cashwell LF, Lichter PR (2008) Factors associated with intraocular pressure before and during 9 years of treatment in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study. Ophthalmology 115(6):927–933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakagawa T, Osaki S (1974) Some aspects of damage models(cumulative processes in reliability physics). Microelectronics Reliability 13:253–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakagawa T, Yasui K (1980) Approximate calculation of optimal inspection times. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 31(9):851–853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • NEI National Eye Institute (2011) Facts about glaucoma. Accessed March 12, 2012, http://www.nei.nih.gov/health/glaucoma/glaucoma_facts.asp.Google Scholar
  • Noonan GC, Fain CG (1962) Optimum preventive maintenance policies when immediate detection of failure is uncertain. Oper. Res. 10(3):407–410.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL, Liu G, Li G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J (2004) Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology 111(9):1627–1635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ohnishi M, Kawai H, Mine H (1986a) An optimal inspection and replacement policy for a deteriorating system. J. Appl. Probab. 23(4):973–988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ohnishi M, Kawai H, Mine H (1986b) An optimal inspection and replacement policy under incomplete state information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 27(1):117–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oshman Y (1994) Optimal sensor selection strategy for discrete-time state estimators. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electr. Systems 30(2):307–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Özekici S, Pliska SR (1991) Optimal scheduling of inspections: A delayed Markov model with false positives and negatives. Oper. Res. 39(2):261–273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pierskalla WP, Voelker JA (1976) A survey of maintenance models: The control and surveillance of deteriorating systems. Naval Res. Logist. 23(3):353–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quigley HA, Broman AT (2006) The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British J. Ophthalmology 90(3):262–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rauner MS, Gutjahr WJ, Heidenberger K, Wagner J, Pasia J (2010) Dynamic policy modeling for chronic diseases: Metaheuristic-based identification of Pareto-optimal screening strategies. Oper. Res. 58(5):1269–1286.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rein DB, Zhang P, Wirth KE, Lee PP, Hoerger TJ, McCall N, Klein R, Tielsch JM, Vijan S, Saaddine J (2006) The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States. Arch. Ophthalmology 124(12):1754–1760.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenfield D (1976) Markovian deterioration with uncertain information. Oper. Res. 24(1):141–155.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Savage IR (1962) Surveillance problems. Naval Res. Logist. 9(3–4):187–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savage IR (1964) Surveillance problems: Poisson models with noise. Naval Res. Logist. 11(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schell GJ, Lavieri MS, Van Oyen MP, Helm JE, Liu X, Musch D, Stein JD (2014) Using filtered forecasting techniques to determine personalized monitoring schedules for patients with open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 121(8):1539–1546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schell GJ, Lavieri MS, Stein JD, Musch DC (2013) Filtering data from the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study for improved identification of glaucoma progression. BMC Medical Informatics Decision Making 13(1):137–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schuman JS, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG, Duker JS (2012) Optical Coherence Tomography of Ocular Diseases, Third ed. (Slack Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Shechter SM, Alagoz O, Roberts MS (2010) Irreversible treatment decisions under consideration of the research and development pipeline for new therapies. IIE Trans. 42(9):632–642.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shechter SM, Bailey MD, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2008) The optimal time to initiate HIV therapy under ordered health states. Oper. Res. 56(1):20–33.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sherif YS, Smith ML (1981) Optimal maintenance models for systems subject to failure—A review. Naval Res. Logist. 28(1):47–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shwartz M (1978) A mathematical model used to analyze breast cancer screening strategies. Oper. Res. 26(6):937–955.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stein JD, Talwar N, LaVerne AM, Nan B, Lichter PR (2012) Trends in use of ancillary glaucoma tests for patients with open-angle glaucoma from 2001 to 2009. Ophthalmology 119(4):748–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Witt K, Katz J, Royall RMet al. (1990) Blindness and visual impairment in an American urban population: The Baltimore eye survey. Arch. Ophthalmology 108(2):286–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang H (2002) A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 139(3):469–489.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu W, Arapostathis A (2008) Optimal sensor querying: General Markovian and LQG models with controlled observations. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 53(6):1392–1405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yeh RH (1997) Optimal inspection and replacement policies for multi-state deteriorating systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 96(2):248–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahari M, Mukesh BN, Rait JL, Taylor HR, McCarty CA (2006) Progression of visual field loss in open angle glaucoma in the Melbourne visual impairment project. Clinical Experiment. Ophtalmology 34(1):20–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zelen M (1993) Optimal scheduling of examinations for the early detection of disease. Biometrika 80(2):279–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.