Ordinal One-Switch Utility Functions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2015.1426

References

  • Abbas AE (2007) Invariant utility functions and certain equivalent transformations. Decision Anal. 4(1):17–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas AE (2009) Multiattribute utility copulas. Oper. Res. 57(6):1367–1383.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas AE (2012) Utility copula functions matching all boundary assessments. Oper. Res. 61(2):359–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas AE, Bell DE (2011) One-switch independence for multiattribute utility functions. Oper. Res. 59(3):764–771.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbas AE, Bell DE (2012) One-switch conditions for multiattribute utility functions. Oper. Res. 60(5):1199–1212.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DE (1979) Multiattribute utility functions: Decompositions using interpolation. Management Sci. 25(2):208–224.Google Scholar
  • Bell DE (1988) One-switch utility functions and a measure of risk. Management Sci. 34(12):1416–1424.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Debreu G (1960) Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. Arrow K, Karlin S, Suppes P, eds. Math. Methods in the Social Sciences (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 16–26.Google Scholar
  • Farquhar PH (1975) A fractional hypercube decomposition theorem for multiattribute utility functions. Oper. Res. 23(5):941–967.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC (1974) von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions on two attributes. Oper. Res. 22(1):35–45.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC (1977) Approximations of two-attribute utility functions. Math. Oper. Res. 2(1):30–44.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karni E, Safra Z (1998) Hexagon condition and additive representation of preferences: An algebraic approach. J. Math. Psych. 42:393–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Shannon S (1994) Monotone comparative statics. Econometrica 62(1):157–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfanzagl J (1959) A general theory of measurement. Applications to utility. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 6:283–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.