OR Forum—Tenure Analytics: Models for Predicting Research Impact

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2015.1447

References

  • Acuna D, Allesina S, Kording K (2012) Future impact: Predicting scientific success. Nature 489(7415):201–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acuna DE, Penner O, Orton CG (2013) The future h-index is an excellent way to predict scientists’ future impact. Medical Phys. 40(11):110601–1–110601–3.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Zivin JSG, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):527–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bader DA, Madduri K (2006) Parallel algorithms for evaluating centrality indices in real-world networks. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Parallel Processing, ICPP’06 (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 539–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabási A-L (2012) Network science. Accessed June 2014, http://barabasilab.neu.edu/networksciencebook.Google Scholar
  • Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel H-D (2008) Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 59(5):830–837.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learn. 45(1):5–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput. Networks ISDN Systems 30(1):107–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (1995) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Canty A, Ripley B (2014) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. Package version 1.3-13.Google Scholar
  • Currie RR, Pandher GS (2011) Finance journal rankings and tiers: An active scholar assessment methodology. J. Banking Finance 35(1):7–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap Methods and Their Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorsey ER, Raphael BA, Balcer L, Galetta S (2006) Predictors of future publication record and academic rank in a cohort of neurology residents. Neurology 67(8):1335–1337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Excellence for Research in Australia (2010) ERA 2010 ranked journal list. Accessed June 2014, http://www.core.edu.au/images/journals/08sortrankalpha-ERA2010_journal_title_list.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1):35–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A (1992) Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors. Theoret. Medicine 13(2):117–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldenberg J, Oestreicher-Singer G, Reichman S (2012) The quest for content: How user-generated links can facilitate online exploration. J. Marketing Res. 49(4):452–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(46):16569–16572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirsch JE (2007) Does the h index have predictive power? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104(49):19193–19198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hönekopp J, Khan J (2012) Future publication success in science is better predicted by traditional measures than by the h index. Scientometrics 90(3):843–853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hult GTM, Reimann M, Schilke O (2009) Worldwide faculty perceptions of marketing journals: Rankings, trends, comparisons, and segmentations. globalEDGE Bus. Rev. 3(3):1–23.Google Scholar
  • INFORMS (2014) Award recipients. Accessed January 2014, https://www.informs.org/Recognize-Excellence/Award-Recipients/.Google Scholar
  • Katona Z, Zubcsek PP, Sarvary M (2011) Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):425–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly Rainer Jr. R, Miller MD (2005) Examining differences across journal rankings. Comm. ACM 48(2):91–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhn M (2015) caret: Classification and Regression Training, R package version 6.0-52. Accessed September 2015, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret.Google Scholar
  • Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomforest. R News 2(3):18–22. Accessed September 2015, http://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/.Google Scholar
  • Mazloumian A (2012) Predicting scholars’ scientific impact. PLOS One 7(11):e49246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Science Foundation (2014a) Faculty early career development (CAREER) program (NSF 14-532). Accessed June 2015, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2014/nsf14532/nsf14532.htm.Google Scholar
  • National Science Foundation (2014b) FY 2014 agency financial report. Accessed April 2015, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15002/index.jsp.Google Scholar
  • Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2):167–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman MEJ (2004) Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101(Suppl 1):5200–5205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Penner O, Pan R, Petersen A, Fortunato S (2013) The case for caution in predicting scientists’ future impact. Phys. Today 66(4):8–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2013) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models, R package version 3.1-113. Accessed September 2015, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP, Bachrach DG (2008) Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. J. Management 34(3):641–720.Google Scholar
  • Ritzberger K (2008) A ranking of journals in economics and related fields. German Econom. Rev. 9(4):402–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Theoharakis V, Skordia M (2003) How do statisticians perceive statistics journals? Amer. Statistician 57(2):115–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valente TW (1996) Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 2(2):163–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang G, Zaid U, Erickson B, Blaschko S, Carroll P, Breyer B (2011) Urology resident publication output and its relationship to future academic achievement. J. Urology 185(2):642–646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.