Risk in a Large Claims Insurance Market with Bipartite Graph Structure

References

• Adrian T, Brunnermeier MK (2016) CoVaR. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(7):1705–1741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amini H, Minca A (2014) Inhomogeneous financial networks and contagious links. Accessed March 3, 2016, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2518840 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2518840.Google Scholar
• Bain AD (1999) Insurance spirals and the London market. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 24(2):228–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbour AD, Holst L, Janson S (1992) Poisson Approximation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Basrak B (2000) The sample autocorrelation function of nonlinear time series. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversteit Groningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Basrak B, Davis RA, Mikosch T (2002) Regular variation of GARCH processes. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 99(1):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biard R (2013) Asymptotic multivariate finite-time ruin probabilities with heavy-tailed claim amounts: Impact of dependence and optimal reserve allocation. Bull. Francais d’Actuariat 13(26):79–92.Google Scholar
• Bingham NH, Goldie CM, Teugels JL (1987) Regular Variation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanchet J, Shi Y (2012) Stochastic risk networks: Modeling, analysis and efficient Monte Carlo. Accessed November 1, 2015, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2012987.Google Scholar
• Bollobás B, Borgs C, Chayes J, Riordan O (2003) Directed scale-free graphs. Proc. Fourteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Baltimore, 2003) (ACM, New York), 132–139.Google Scholar
• Boss M, Elsinger H, Summer M, Thurner S (2004) The network topology of the interbank market. Quant. Finance 4(6):677–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braverman A, Minca A (2014) Networks of common asset holdings: aggregation and measures of vulnerability. Accessed November 1, 2015, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2379669.Google Scholar
• Bregman Y, Klüppelberg C (2005) Ruin estimation in multivariate models with Clayton dependence structure. Scand. Act. J. 2005(6):462–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiman L (1965) On some limit theorems similar to the arc-sine law. Theory Probab. Appl. 10:323–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brownlees CT, Engle R (2016) SRISK: A conditional capital shortfall measure of systemic risk. Rev. Finance Studies. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier MK, Cheridito P (2014) Measuring and allocating systemic risk. Accessed November 1, 2015, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2372472 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2372472.Google Scholar
• Caccioli F, Shrestha M, Moore C, Farmer JD (2014) Stability analysis of financial contagion due to overlapping portfolios. J. Banking Finance 46:233–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C, Iyengar G, Moallemi C (2013) An axiomatic approach to systemic risk. Management Sci. 59(6):1373–1388.Link, Google Scholar
• Cont R, Moussa A, Santos EB (2013) Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems. Fouque J-P, Langsam JA, eds. Handbook on Systemic Risk (Cambridge University Press, New York), 327–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cope EW, Mignola G, Antonini G, Ugoccioni R (2009) Challenges and pitfalls in measuring operational risk from loss data. J. Oper. Risk 4(4):3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Vries CG, Samorodnitsky G, Jorgensen BN, Mandira S, Danielsson J (2005) Subadditivity re–examined: The case for value-at-risk. FMG Discussion Papers dp549, Financial Markets Group.Google Scholar
• Eder I, Klüppelberg C (2009) The first passage event for sums of dependent Lévy processes with applications to insurance risk. Ann. Appl. Probab. 19(6):2047–2079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eder I, Klüppelberg C (2012) Pareto Lévy measures and multivariate regular variation. Adv. Appl. Probab. 44(1):117–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg L, Noe T (2001) Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Sci. 47:2236–2249.Link, Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Lambrigger DD, Wüthrich MV (2009a) Multivariate extremes and the aggregation of dependent risks: Examples and counter-examples. Extremes 12:107–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Nešlehová J, Wüthrich MV (2009b) Additivity properties for Value-at-Risk under Archimedean dependence and heavy-tailedness. Insurance: Math. Econom. 44(2):164–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gai P, Kapadia S (2010) Contagion in financial networks. Proc. Roy. Soc. A: Math., Physical Engrg. Sci. 466(2120):2401–2423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haldane AG, May RM (2011) Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469(7330):351–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann H, Meyer-Brandis T, Svindland G (2016) Risk-consistent conditional systemic risk measures. Stochastic Processes their Appl. 126(7):2014–2037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hult H, Lindskog F (2006) Heavy-tailed insurance portfolios: Buffer capital and ruin probabilities. Technical Report 1441.Google Scholar
• Ibragimov R (2009) Portfolio diversification and value at risk under thick-tailedness. Quant. Finance 9(5):565–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) (2011) Insurance and Financial Stability, http://forinsurer.com/files/file00400.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kley O, Klüppelberg C (2016) Bounds for randomly shared risk of heavy-tailed loss factors. Extremes, ePub ahead of print April 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10687-016-0248-2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kley O, Klüppelberg C, Reinert G (2015) Conditional risk measures in a large claims market with bipartite graph structure. Preprint Technische Universität München. Submitted.Google Scholar
• Kromer E, Overbeck L, Zilch KA (2015) Systemic risk measures on general probability spaces. Accessed March 20, 2015, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2268105.Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Yu J, Peterson MO (2014) Reinsurance networks and their impact on reinsurance decisions: Theory and empirical evidence. J. Risk Insurance 82(3):531–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mainik G, Rüschendorf L (2010) On optimal portfolio diversification with respect to extreme risks. Finance Stochastics 14(4):593–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munich Reinsurance Company (2014) Annual report. Accessed March 1, 2016, http://www.munichre.com/site/corporate/get/documents_E-1770937763/mr/assetpool.shared/Documents/0_Corporate%20Website/_Financial%20Reports/2015/Annual%20Report%202014/302-08574_en.pdf.Google Scholar
• Rasch G (1961) On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. Proc. Fourth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab., IV (University of California Press, Berkeley), 321–333.Google Scholar
• Resnick SI (1987) Extreme Values, Regular Variation, and Point Processes (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick SI (2007) Heavy-Tail Phenomena (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Rootzén H, Klüppelberg C (1999) A single number can’t hedge against economic catastrophes. AMBIO: A J. Human Environment 28(6):550–555.Google Scholar
• Samorodnitsky G, Resnick S, Towsley D, Davis R, Willis A, Wan P (2016) Nonstandard regular variation of in-degree and out-degree in the preferential attachment model. J. Appl. Probab. 53(1):146–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Dahlen S, von Peter G (2012) Natural catastrophes and global reinsurance—Exploring the linkages. BIS Quart. Rev.Google Scholar
• Zhou C (2010) Dependence structure of risk factors and diversification effects. Insurance: Math. Econom. 46(3):531–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zigrand J-P (2014) Systems and systemic risk in finance and economics, sRC Special Paper 1. Systemic Risk Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar