Efficient Advert Assignment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1519

References

  • Aggarwal G, Feldman J, Muthukrishnan S (2007) Bidding to the top: VCG and equilibria of position-based auctions. Approximation and Online Algorithms (Springer, Berlin), 15–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ausubel LM, Milgrom P (2006) The lovely but lonely Vickrey auction. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 17–40.Google Scholar
  • Bachrach Y, Ceppi S, Kash IA, Key P, Kurokawa D (2014) Optimising trade-offs among stakeholders in ad auctions. Babaioff M, Conitzer V, Easley D, eds. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput., EC’14 (ACM, New York), 75–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckmann M, McGuire C, Winsten CB (1956) Studies in the Economics of Transportation (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Bertsekas DP (1988) The auction algorithm: A distributed relaxation method for the assignment problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 14(1):105–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, de Vries S, Schummer J, Vohra RV (2002) Linear programming and Vickrey auctions. Dietrich B, Vohra R, eds. Mathematics of the Internet: E-Auction and Markets. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications (Springer, New York), 75–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnbaum B, Devanur NR, Xiao L (2010) New convex programs and distributed algorithms for Fisher markets with linear and spending constraint utilities. Technical Report MSR-TR-2010-112. Accessed August 1, 2016, http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=136327.Google Scholar
  • Borgs C, Chayes J, Immorlica N, Jain K, Etesami O, Mahdian M (2007) Dynamics of bid optimization in online advertisement auctions. Proc. 16th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, WWW ’07 (ACM, New York), 531–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borwein J, Lewis A (2006) Convex Analysis and Nonlinear Optimization: Theory and Examples, CMS Books in Mathematics (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chawla S, Hartline JD (2013) Auctions with unique equilibria. Kearns M, Preston McAfee R, Tardos È, eds. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, EC’13 (ACM, New York), 181–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dütting P, Fischer F, Parkes DC (2011) Simplicity-expressiveness tradeoffs in mechanism design. Shoham Y, Chen Y, Roughgarden T, eds. Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 341–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dütting P, Fischer F, Parkes DC (2014) Expressiveness and robustness of first-price position auctions. Babaioff M, Conitzer V, Easley D, eds. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput., EC’14 (ACM, New York), 57–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B, Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2007) Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):242–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg E, Gale D (1959) Consensus of subjective probabilities: The pari-mutuel method. Ann. Math. Statist. 30(1):165–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher I (1892) Mathematical investigations in the theory of value and prices. Trans. Connecticut Acad. Sci. Arts 9:124.Google Scholar
  • Goel G, Khani MR (2014) Revenue monotone mechanisms for online advertising. Chung C-W, Broder AZ, Shim K, Suel T, eds. Proc. 23rd International Conf. World Wide Web, WWW ’14 (ACM, New York), 723–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoy D, Jain K, Wilkens CA (2013) A dynamic axiomatic approach to first-price auctions. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, EC’13 (ACM, New York), 583–584.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer K, Johari R, Sundararajan M (2011) Mean field equilibria of dynamic auctions with learning. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 10(3):10–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain K, Vazirani VV (2007) Eisenberg-Gale markets: Algorithms and structural properties. Johnson DS, Feige U, eds. Proc. 39th Ann. ACM Sympos. Theory Comput., STOC ’07 (ACM, New York), 364–373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johari R, Tsitsiklis JN (2004) Efficiency loss in a network resource allocation game. Math. Oper. Res. 29(3):407–435.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johari R, Tsitsiklis JN (2009) Efficiency of scalar-parameterized mechanisms. Oper. Res. 57(4):823–839.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly F (2003) Fairness and stability of end-to-end congestion control. Eur. J. Control 9(2):159–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly F, Yudovina E (2014) Stochastic Networks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khalil H (2002) Nonlinear Systems (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Kuhn HW (1955) The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 2(1–2):83–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard HB (1983) Elicitation of honest preferences for the assignment of individuals to positions. J. Political Econom. 91(3):461–479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin J, Milgrom P (2010) Online advertising: Heterogeneity and conflation in markt design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(2):603–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maheswaran RT, Basar T (2004) Social welfare of selfish agents: Motivating efficiency for divisible resources. Proc. 43rd IEEE Conf. Decision Control, CDC, Vol. 2 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1550–1555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P (2004) Putting Auction Theory to Work, Churchill Lectures in Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P (2010) Simplified mechanisms with an application to sponsored-search auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 70(1):62–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nekipelov D, Syrgkanis V, Tardos E (2015) Econometrics for learning agents. Roughgarden T, Feldman M, Schwarz M, eds. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput., EC ’15 (ACM, New York), 1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2011) Reserve prices in Internet advertising auctions: A field experiment. Shoham Y, Chen Y, Roughgarden T, eds. Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 59–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pin F, Key P (2011) Stochastic variability in sponsored search auctions. Shoham Y, Chen Y, Roughgarden T, eds. Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, EC ’11 (ACM, New York), 61–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts B, Gunawardena D, Kash IA, Key P (2013) Ranking and tradeoffs in sponsored search auctions. Kearns M, Preston McAfee R, Tardos É, eds. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, EC ’13 (ACM, New York), 751–766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT (1997) Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Srikant R (2004) The Mathematics of Internet Congestion Control (Birkhauser, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan B, Srikant R (2012) Online advertisement, optimization and stochastic networks. Automatic Control, IEEE Trans. 57(11):2854–2868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tran-Thanh L, Stavrogiannis LC, Naroditskiy V, Robu V, Jennings NR, Key P (2014) Efficient regret bounds for online bid optimisation in budget-limited sponsored search auctions. Zhang NL, Tian J, eds. 30th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI’14 (AUAI, OR), 809–818.Google Scholar
  • Varian HR (2007) Position auctions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 25(6): 1163–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR, Harris C (2014) The VCG auction in theory and practice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):442–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vazirani VV (2010) Spending constraint utilities with applications to the adwords market. Math. Oper. Res. 35(2):458–478.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vickrey W (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 16(1):8–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wardrop JG (1952) Road paper. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. ICE Proc.: Engrg. Divisions, Vol. 1 (Thomas Telford, London), 325–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang S, Hajek B (2006) Revenue and stability of a mechanism for efficient allocation of a divisible good. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
  • Yang S, Hajek B (2007) VCG-Kelly mechanisms for allocation of divisible goods: Adapting VCG mechanisms to one-dimensional signals. Selected Areas Commun. IEEE J. 25(6):1237–1243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.