Indifference-Zone-Free Selection of the Best
Published Online:13 Oct 2016https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1530
References
- (1955) On statistics independent of a complete sufficient statistic. Sankhyā: The Indian J. Statist. 35:377–380.Google Scholar
- (2006) Fully sequential selection procedures with a parabolic boundary. IIE Trans. 38(9):749–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1954) A single-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with known variances. Ann. Math. Statist. 16–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening, and Multiple Comparisons (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
- (2007) Selecting a selection procedure. Management Sci. 53(12):1916–1932.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multi-armed bandit problems. Foundations Trends Machine Learn. 5(1):1–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Oper. Res. 49(5):732–743.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Sequential sampling with economics of selection procedures. Management Sci. 58(3):550–569.Link, Google Scholar
- (1986) A Bonferroni selection procedure when using commom random numbers with unknown variances. Proc. 1986 Winter Simulation Conf. (WSC), 313–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1969) An approximation to the sample size in selection problems. Ann. Math. Statist. 40(2):492–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) The first-passage density of a continuous gaussian process to a general boundary. J. Appl. Probab. 99–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Probability: Theory and Examples (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) A frequentist selection-of-the-best procedure without indifference zone. Buckley SJ, Miller JA, eds. Proc. 2014 Winter Simulation Conf. (WSC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 3737–3748.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) A fully sequential elimination procedure for indifference-zone ranking and selection with tight bounds on probability of correct selection. Oper. Res. 62(4):926–942.Link, Google Scholar
- (1956) On a decision rule for a problem in ranking means. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
- (1965) On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules. Technometrics 7(2):225–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Fully sequential indifference-zone selection procedures with variance-dependent sampling. Naval Res. Logist. 53(5):464–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) The tradeoff between sampling and switching: New sequential procedures for indifference-zone selection. IIE Trans. 37(7):623–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Selecting the best system when systems are revealed sequentially. IIE Trans. 39(7):723–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Best-arm identification algorithms for multi-armed bandits in the fixed confidence setting. 48th Annual Conf. Inform. Sci. Systems (CISS) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) First exit densities of brownian motion through one-sided moving boundaries. Zeitschrift Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verwandte Gebiete 55(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Asymptotically optimal procedures for sequential adaptive selection of the best of several normal means. Technical Report, Department of ORIE, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
- (2013) Almost optimal exploration in multi-armed bandits. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ICML) (JMLR.org), 1238–1246.Google Scholar
- (2001) A fully sequential procedure for indifference-zone selection in simulation. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulation 11(3):251–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006a) Selecting the best system. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation, Vol. 13 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 501–534.Google Scholar
- (2006b) On the asymptotic validity of fully sequential selection procedures for steady-state simulation. Oper. Res. 54(3):475–488.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) A comparison of two parallel ranking and selection procedures. Buckley SJ, Miller JA, eds. Proc. 2014 Winter Simulation Conf. (WSC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 3761–3772.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Exploring bounds on ambulance deployment policy performance. Rose O, Uhrmacher AM, eds. Proc. 2012 Winter Simulation Conf. (WSC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1971) On a subset selection procedure for the most probable event in a multinomial distribution. Statist. Decision Theory Related Topics 275–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1964) A sequential procedure for selecting the population with the largest mean from k normal populations. Ann. Math. Statist. 35(1):174–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1969) A comparison of the asymptotic expected sample sizes of two sequential procedures for ranking problem. Ann. Math. Statist. 40(6):2198–2202.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) A sequential procedure for neighborhood selection-of-the-best in optimization via simulation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 173(1):283–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 7(8):799–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Restricted subset selection procedures for simulation. Oper. Res. 37(1):52–71.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Reducing the conservativeness of fully sequential indifference-zone procedures. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 58(6):1613–1619.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002a) Stochastic-Process Limits: An Introduction to Stochastic-Process Limits and Their Application to Queues (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar

