Technical Note—Path-Dependent and Randomized Strategies in Barberis’ Casino Gambling Model
Published Online:1 Nov 2016https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1545
References
- (2016) Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. J. Political Econom. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2012) A model of casino gambling. Management Sci. 58(1):35–51.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Violations of betweenness or random errors? Econom. Lett. 91(1):34–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. J. Risk Uncertainty 8(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Flipping a coin: Theory and evidence. SSRN: 2353282.Google Scholar
- (2015) Until the bitter end: On prospect theory in a dynamic context. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(4):1618–1633.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Optimal exit time from casino gambling: Strategies of pre-committing and naive agents. SSRN: 2684043.Google Scholar
- (2015) Randomized strategies and prospect theory in a dynamic context. SSRN: 2531457.Google Scholar
- (2014) Optimal exist strategies of behavioral gamblers. Ph.D. thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Stochastic choice functions generated from deterministic preferences over lotteries. Econom. J. 95(379):575–594.Google Scholar
- (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory Dec. 36(1):1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55(1):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar

