Robust Product Line Design

References

• Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19(6):716–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby GM, Rossi PE (1998) Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econometrics 89(1):57–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron O, Milner J, Naseraldin H (2011) Facility location: A robust optimization approach. Production Oper. Management 20(5):772–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Freund R, Selove M, Simester D (2008) Optimizing product line designs: Efficient methods and comparisons. Management Sci. 54(9):1544–1552.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper. Res. 52(1):35–53.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Thiele A (2006) A robust optimization approach to inventory theory. Oper. Res. 54(1):150–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Brown DB, Caramanis C (2011) Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev. 53(3):464–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Silberholz J, Trikalinos T (2016) Optimal healthcare decision making under multiple mathematical models: Application in prostate cancer screening. Health Care Management Sci., ePub ahead of print September 17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-016-9381-3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Litvinov E, Sun XA, Zhao J, Zheng T (2013) Adaptive robust optimization for the security constrained unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 28(1):52–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharati B, Luo L, Azarm S, Kannan PK (2006) Multi-objective single product robust optimization: An integrated design and marketing approach. J. Mechanical Design 128(4):884–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bezanson J, Karpinski S, Shah VB, Edelman A (2012) Julia: A fast dynamic language for technical computing. Preprint, arXiv:1209.5145.Google Scholar
• Bozdogan H (1987) Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 52(3):345–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen KD, Hausman WH (2000) Technical note: Mathematical properties of the optimal product line selection problem using choice-based conjoint analysis. Management Sci. 46(2):327–332.Link, Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 39(1):1–38.Google Scholar
• Dobson G, Kalish S (1988) Positioning and pricing a product line. Marketing Sci. 7(2):107–125.Link, Google Scholar
• Dobson G, Kalish S (1993) Heuristics for pricing and positioning a product-line using conjoint and cost data. Management Sci. 39(2):160–175.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb D, Iyengar G (2003) Robust portfolio selection problems. Math. Oper. Res. 28(1):1–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Green PE, Krieger AM (1985) Models and heuristics for product line selection. Marketing Sci. 4(1):1–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Green PE, Krieger AM (1993) Conjoint analysis with product-positioning applications. Eliashberg J, Lilien GL, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 467–515.Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Sukumar R (1990) Heuristics for product-line design using conjoint analysis. Management Sci. 36(12):1464–1478.Link, Google Scholar
• Kraus UG, Yano CA (2003) Product line selection and pricing under a share-of-surplus choice model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 150(3):653–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lubin M, Dunning I (2015) Computing in operations research using Julia. INFORMS J. Comput. 27(2):238–248.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo L (2011) Product line design for consumer durables: An integrated marketing and engineering approach. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):128–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo L, Kannan PK, Besharati B, Azarm S (2005) Design of robust new products under variability: Marketing meets design. J. Product Innovation Management 22(2):177–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McBride RD, Zufryden FS (1988) An integer programming approach to the optimal product line selection problem. Marketing Sci. 7(2):126–140.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE (2012) Bayesm: Bayesian Inference for Marketing/Micro-econometrics. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bayesm. R package version 2.2–5.Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM (2003) Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. 22(3):304–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R (2012) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H (2012) Robust assortment optimization in revenue management under the multinomial logit choice model. Oper. Res. 60(4):865–882.Link, Google Scholar
• Sawtooth Software (2003) Advanced Simulation Module (ASM) for Product Optimization v1.5. Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/asmtech.pdf.Google Scholar
• Schön C (2010a) On the optimal product line selection problem with price discrimination. Management Sci. 56(5):896–902.Link, Google Scholar
• Schön C (2010b) On the product line selection problem under attraction choice models of consumer behavior. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206(1):260–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6(2):461–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Simester DI, Hauser JR, Dahan E (2003) Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. 22(3):273–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Train KE (2008) EM algorithms for nonparametric estimation of mixing distributions. J. Choice Model. 1(1):40–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zufryden FS (1982) Product line optimization by integer programming. Proc. Annual Meeting of ORSA/TIMS, San Diego, CA, 100–114.Google Scholar