Cross-Selling Investment Products with a Win-Win Perspective in Portfolio Optimization

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1556

References

  • Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 17(6):734–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhaskar T, Sundararajan R, Krishnan PG (2009) A fuzzy mathematical programming approach for cross-sell optimization in retail banking. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 60(5):717–727.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyle P, Garlappi L, Uppal R, Wang T (2012) Keynes meets Markowitz: The trade-off between familiarity and diversification. Management Sci. 58(2):253–272.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley AP (1997) The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition 30(7):1145–1159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J. Econom. Surveys 22(1):31–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card D, Krueger AB (2000) Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1397–1420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chankong V, Haimes YY (1983) Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology (North-Holland, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chawla N (2009) Mining when classes are imbalanced, rare events matter more, and errors have costs attached. SIAM Internat. Conf. Data Mining, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP (2002) SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 16(1):341–378.Google Scholar
  • Cohen M-D (2004) Exploiting response models: Optimizing cross-sell and up-sell opportunities in banking. Inform. Systems 29(4):327–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daniel K, Hirshleifer D, Teoh SH (2002) Investor psychology in capital markets: Evidence and policy implications. J. Monetary Econom. 49(1):139–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das S, Markowitz H, Scheid J, Statman M (2010) Portfolio optimization with mental accounts. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 45(2):311–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Estabrooks A, Jo T, Japkowicz N (2004) A multiple resampling method for learning from imbalanced data sets. Comput. Intelligence 20(1):18–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garlappi L, Uppal R, Wang T (2007) Portfolio selection with parameter and model uncertainty: A multi-prior approach. Rev. Financial Stud. 20(1):41–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goetzmann WN, Kumar A (2008) Equity portfolio diversification. Rev. Finance 12(3):433–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Güneş ED, Akşin OZ, Örmeci EL, Özden SH (2010) Modeling customer reactions to sales attempts: If cross-selling backfires. J. Service Res. 13(2):168–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Saxena A (2010) A hybrid approach to asset allocation with simultaneous consideration of suitability and optimality. Inform. Sci. 180(11):2264–2285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guyon I, Elisseeff A (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3(March):1157–1182.Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Riepe MW (1998) Aspects of investor psychology. J. Portfolio Management 24(4):52–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1):193–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamakura WA, Ramaswami SN, Srivastava RK (1991) Applying latent trait analysis in the evaluation of prospects for cross-selling of financial services. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 8(4):329–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim Y, Street WN, Russell GJ, Menczer F (2005) Customer targeting: A neural network approach guided by genetic algorithms. Management Sci. 51(2):264–276.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knott A, Hayes A, Neslin SA (2002) Next-product-to-buy models for cross-selling applications. J. Interactive Marketing 16(3):59–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laurikkala J (2001) Improving identification of difficult small classes by balancing class distribution. Quaglini S, Barahona P, Andreassen S, eds. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2101 (Springer, Berlin), 63–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li S, Sun B, Montgomery AL (2011) Cross-selling the right product to the right customer at the right time. J. Marketing Res. 48(4):683–700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li S, Sun B, Wilcox RT (2005) Cross-selling sequentially ordered products: An application to consumer banking services. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):233–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madrian BC, Shea DF (2001) The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1149–1187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maenhout PJ (2004) Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing. Rev. Financial Stud. 17(4):951–983.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1):77–91.Google Scholar
  • Mehta N, Chen X, Narasimhan O (2008) Informing, transforming, and persuading: Disentangling the multiple effects of advertising on brand choice decisions. Marketing Sci. 27(3):334–355.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moon S, Russell GJ (2008) Predicting product purchase from inferred customer similarity: An autologistic model approach. Management Sci. 54(1):71–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Paolacci G, Burson KA, Rick SI (2011) The intermediate alternative effect: Considering a small trade-off increases subsequent willingness to make large trade-offs. J. Consumer Psych. 21(4):384–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prinzie A, Van den Poel D (2006) Investigating purchasing-sequence patterns for financial services using Markov, MTD and MTDg models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170(3):710–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao CR (1964) The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyā, Ser. A 26(4):329–358.Google Scholar
  • Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharpe WF (2007) Expected utility asset allocation. Financial Analysts J. 63(5):18–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shefrin H, Statman M (1985) The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. J. Finance 40(3):777–790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shmueli G, Koppius OR (2011) Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quart. 35(3):553–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spranca M, Minsk E, Baron J (1991) Omission and commission in judgment and choice. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 27(1):76–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vaughan TS, Berry KE (2005) Using Monte Carlo techniques to demonstrate the meaning and implications of multicollinearity. J. Statist. Ed. 13(1):1–9.Google Scholar
  • Weiss GM (2004) Mining with rarity: A unifying framework. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newslett. 6(1):7–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.