Analysis of the Bullwhip Effect in a Multiproduct Setting with Interdependent Demands
Published Online:31 Jan 2017https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1571
References
- (2003) Stochastic characterization of upstream demand processes in a supply chain. IIE Trans. 35(3):207–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) A time-series framework for supply chain inventory management. Oper. Res. 51(2):210–227.Link, Google Scholar
- (1977) A canonical analysis of multiple time series. Biometrika 64(2):355–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Bullwhip in a multiproduct production setting. Rev. Bus. Econom. Literature 57(3):354–380.Google Scholar
- (2012) Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 58(5):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) In search of the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):457–479.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Bullwhip effect measure in supply shains with VAR(1) demand process. Internat. J. Indust. Engrg. Production Res. 19(4):9–19.Google Scholar
- (2010) Performance analysis of demand planning approaches for aggregating, forecasting and disaggregating interrelated demands. Internat. J. Production Econom. 128(2): 586–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Information sharing and order variability control under a generalized demand model. Management Sci. 55(5):781–797.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Bullwhip effect measurement and its implications. Oper. Res. 60(4):771–784.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Modeling and measuring the bullwhip effect. Ha AY, Tang CS, eds. Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, Vol. 5 (Springer, New York), 3–25.Google Scholar
- (2017) Measuring the bullwhip effect: Discrepancy and alignment between information and material flows. Manufacturing & Service Oper. Management 19(1):37–52.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Sci. 46(3):436–443.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Measuring the bullwhip effect in supply chains, Supply Chain Management: An Internat. J. 5(2000):78–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Information sharing in a supply chain under ARMA demand. Management Sci. 51(6):961–969.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) An ARIMA supply chain model. Management Sci. 51(2):305–310.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) A single-item inventory model for a nonstationary demand process. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 1(1):50–61.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Solectron: From Contract Manufacturer to Global Supply Chain Integrator, Stanford Graduate School of Business Case: GS24.Google Scholar
- (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The Bullwhip Effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. 46(5):626–643.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) How a base stock policy using stale forecasts provides supply chain benefits. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(2):149–162.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Forecasting aggregate demand: Analytical comparison of top-down and bottom-up approaches in a multivariate exponential smoothing framework. Internat. J. Production Econom. 146(1):185–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Modeling multiple times series with applications. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 76(376):802–816.Google Scholar
- (1983) Multiple time series modeling and extended sample cross-correlations. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 1(1):43–59.Google Scholar
- (2016) The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(3):691–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004a) The impact of forecasting methods on the bullwhip effect. Internat. J. Production Econom. 88(1):15–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004b) Evolution of ARMA demand in supply chains. Manufacturing Services Oper. Management 6(2):195–198.Link, Google Scholar

