Optimal Award Scheme in Innovation Tournaments

References

• Ales L, Cho S, Korpeoglu E (2016) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Cha M, Kwak M, Rodriguez P, Ahn Y-Y, Moon S (2007) I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: Analyzing the world’s largest user generated content video system. Papagiannaki K, Zhang Z-L, eds. Proc. 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conf. Internet Measurement, IMC ’07 (ACM, New York), 1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che YK, Gale I (2003) Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):646–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahan E, Mendelson H (2001) An extreme-value model of concept testing. Management Sci. 47(1):102–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Ennomotive (2016) Alternative to shot blasting for aluminum injection parts manufacturing. Accessed April 11, 2016, http://www.ennomotive.com/alternative-shot-blasting-aluminum-injection-parts-10-000-e-prizes/.Google Scholar
• Fullerton RL, McAfee RP (1999) Auctioning entry into tournaments. J. Political Econom. 107(3):573–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2003) Bayesian Data Analysis (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Green JR, Stokey NL (1983) A comparison of tournaments and contracts. J. Political Econom. 91(3):349–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibragimov IA (1956) On the composition of unimodal distributions. Theory Probab. Appl. 1(2):255–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• InnoCentive (2016a) New translational models of psychiatric diseases. Accessed April 11, 2016, https://www.innocentive.com/ar/challenge/9933822.Google Scholar
• InnoCentive (2016b) Novo Nordisk challenge: Design and synthesis of a small molecule glucose binder. Accessed April 11, 2016, https://www.innocentive.com/ar/challenge/9933823.Google Scholar
• Kalra A, Shi M (2001) Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. 20(2):170–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Lim MK (2015) R&D outsourcing in an innovation-driven supply chain. Oper. Res. Lett. 43(1):20–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korpeoglu E, Cho S (2017) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1970) Increasing risk: I. a definition. J. Econom. Theory 2(3):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samsung (2012) Winners of samsung smart app challenge 2012 unveiled. Accessed April 11, 2016, http://developer.samsung.com/what-is-new/news/2012/Winners-of-Samsung-Smart-App-Challenge-2012-Unveiled.Google Scholar
• Taylor CR (1995) Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):872–890.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar