The Impact of Inspection Cost on Equilibrium, Revenue, and Social Welfare in a Single-Server Queue

References

• Chen H, Frank M (2004) Monopoly pricing when customers queue. IIE Trans. 36(6):569–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelson NM, Hildebrand K (1975) Congestion tolls for Poisson queueing processes. Econometrica 43(1):81–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill JM (1994) Nonurgent use of the emergency department: Appropriate or not? Ann. Emergency Medicine 24(5):953–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hann IH, Hui KL, Lee TS, Png IPL (2002) Online information privacy: Measuring the cost-benefit trade-off. Miralles F, Valor J, eds. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, ICIS ’02 (AIS, Atlanta), 1–10.Google Scholar
• Hassin R (1986) Consumer information in markets with random product quality: The case of queues and balking. Econometrica 54(5):1185–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassin R (2016) Rational Queueing (CRC Press, Boca Raton FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassin R, Haviv M (1994) Equilibrium strategies and the value of information in a two line queueing system with partial jockeying. Comm. Statist.—Stochastic Models 10:415–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassin R, Haviv M (2003) To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassin R, Roet-Green R (2016) Cascade equilibrium strategies in a two-server queueing systems with inspection cost. Working paper, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
• Hu M, Li Y, Wang J (2016) Efficient ignorance: Information heterogeneity in a queue. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Huang T, Van Mieghem JA (2014) Clickstream data and inventory management: Model and empirical analysis. Production Oper. Management Soc. 23(3):333–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley JL (1955) General Topology (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Kerner Y (2011) Equilibrium joining probabilities for an M/G/1 queue. Games Econom. Behav. 71(2):512–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Large JH, Norman TWL (2010) Markov perfect Bayesian equilibrium via ergodicity. Working paper, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
• Ma TW (2002) Banach-Hilbert Spaces, Vector Measures and Group Representations (World Scientific Publishing, Danvers, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marianov V, Rios M, Barros FJ (2005) Allocating servers to facilities, when demand is elastic to travel and waiting time. RAIRO—Oper. Res. 39(3):143–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miyazaki AD, Fernandez A (2001) Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. J. Consumer Affairs 35(1):27–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naor P (1969) The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica 37 (1):15–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett DK, Brodsky B (1992) Psychosocial factors influencing non-urgent use of the emergency room: A review of the literature and recommendations for research and improved service delivery. Soc. Sci. Medicine 35(9):1189–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen LA, Burstin HR, O’Neil AC, Anne CC, Orav JE, Brennan T (1998) Nonurgent emergency department visits: The effect of having a regular doctor. Medical Care 36(8):1249–1255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid M, Szendroi B (2005) Geometry and Topology (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheehan KB (2002) Toward a typology of Internet users and online privacy concerns. Inform. Soc.: An Internat. J. 18(1):21–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundar DK, Ravikumar K (2014) An actor-critic algorithm for multi-agent learning in queue-based stochastic games. Neurocomputing 127(15):258–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu J, Hajek B (2013) The supermarket game. Stochastic Systems 3(2):405–441.Link, Google Scholar
• Yechiali U (1971) On optimal balking rules and toll charges in the GI/M/1 queuing process. Oper. Res. 19(2):349–370.Link, Google Scholar