Relation Between EBA and Nested Logit Models

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1580

References

  • Batley R, Daly A (2006) On the equivalence between elimination-by-aspects and generalized extreme value models of choice behavior. J. Math. Psych. 50(5):456–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beggs S, Cardell S, Hausman J (1981) Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. J. Econometrics 17(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bentley T, Seetharaman PB (2016) Identifying unobserved similarity: Estimating a generalized EBA model on scanner data. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  • Bierlaire M (2006) A theoretical analysis of the cross nested logit model. Ann. Oper. Res. 144(1):287–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dagsvik JK (1995) How large is the class of generalized extreme value random utility models? J. Math. Psych. 39(1):90–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hensher DA, Greene WH (2002) Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: Alternative normalisations. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 36(1):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R, Jedidi K (2015) Error theory for elimination by aspects. Oper. Res. 63(3):512–526.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait J (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications in Marketing: Transportation and Environmental Valuation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Manski C, McFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA),198–272.Google Scholar
  • Papola A (2004) Some developments on the cross nested logit model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 38(9):833–851.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A (1972a) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. 79(4):281–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A (1972b) Choice by elimination. J. Math. Psych. 9(4):341–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Sattah S (1979) Preference trees. Psych. Rev. 86(6):542–573.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vovsha P (1997) Application of cross nested logit model to mode choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, metropolitan area. Transportation Res. Record 1607:6–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vovsha P, Bekor S (1998) Link-nested logit model of route choice: Overcoming route overlapping problem. Transportation Res. Record 1645:133–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wen CH, Koppelman FS (2001) The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 35(7):627–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.