Mechanism and Network Design with Private Negative Externalities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1585

References

  • Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2013) The network origins of large economic downturns. Technical Report 19230, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2015) Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):564–608.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acemoglu D, Carvalho VM, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2012) The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 80(5):1977–2016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anshelevich E, Dasgupta A, Tardos E, Wexler T (2003) Near-optimal network design with selfish agents. Proc. Thirty-Fifth Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. STOC ’03 (ACM, New York), 511–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arcaute E, Dyagilev K, Johari R, Mannor S (2013) Dynamics in tree formation games. Games Econom. Behav. 79:1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aseff J, Chade H (2008) An optimal auction with identity-dependent externalities. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):731–746.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharya S, Kulkarni J, Munagala K, Xu X (2011) On allocations with negative externalities. Chen N, Elkind E, Koutsoupias E, eds. Proc. 7th Internat. Workshop on Internet and Network Econom., WINE ’11 (Springer, Berlin), 25–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boucheron S, Lugosi G, Massart P (2013) Concentration Inequalities: A Nonasymptotic Theory of Independence (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brocas I (2013) Optimal allocation mechanisms with type-dependent negative externalities. Theory and Decision 75(3):359–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Candogan O, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2012) Optimal pricing in networks with externalities. Oper. Res. 60(4):883–905.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H-L, Roughgarden T, Valiant G (2008) Designing networks with good equilibria. Proc. Nineteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Dlgorithms, SODA ’08 (SIAM, Philadelphia), 854–863.Google Scholar
  • Deng C, Pekeč S (2011) Money for nothing: Exploiting negative externalities. Shoham Y, Chen Y, Roughgarden T, eds. Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 361–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein A, Feldman M, Mansour Y (2009) Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games. Games Econom. Behav. 67(1):51–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. 16(1):70–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Figueroa N, Skreta V (2009) The role of optimal threats in auction design. J. Econom. Theory 144(2):884–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Figueroa N, Skreta V (2011) Optimal allocation mechanisms with single-dimensional private information. Rev. Econom. Design 15(3):213–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haghpanah N, Immorlica N, Mirrokni V, Munagala K (2013) Optimal auctions with positive network externalities. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 1(2):13:1–13:24.Google Scholar
  • Jackson MO (2005) A survey of network formation models: Stability and efficiency. Demange G, Wooders M, eds. Group Formation in Economics: Networks, Clubs, and Coalitions, Chap. 1 (Cambridge University Press, New York), 11–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehiel P, Moldovanu B (2001) Efficient design with interdependent valuations. Econometrica 69(5):1237–1259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehiel P, Moldovanu B, Stacchetti E (1996) How (not) to sell nuclear weapons. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(4):814–829.Google Scholar
  • Jehiel P, Moldovanu B, Stacchetti E (1999) Multidimensional mechanism design for auctions with externalities. J. Econom. Theory 85(2):258–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johari R, Kumar S (2010) Congestible services and network effects. Parkes DC, Dellarocas C, Tennenholtz M, eds. Proc. 11th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 93–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
  • Manelli AM, Vincent DR (2007) Multidimensional mechanism design: Revenue maximization and the multiple-good monopoly. J. Econom. Theory 137(1):153–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marden JR, Wierman A (2013) Distributed welfare games. Oper. Res. 61(1):155–168.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maskin E (2003) Auctions and efficiency. Dewatripont M, Hansen LP, Turnovsky SJ, eds., Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Eighth World Congress (Econometric Society Monographs), Vol. 1, Chap. 1 (Cambridge University Press, New York), 1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Segal I (2002) Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica 70(2):583–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peivandi A, Vohra RV (2013) On fragmented markets. Working paper.Google Scholar
  • Roth AE, Xing X (1994) Jumping the gun: Imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):992–1044.Google Scholar
  • Schummer J, Vohra RV (2002) Strategy-proof location on a network. J. Economic Theory 104(2):405–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wisconsin School of Business (2007) Wisconsin Naming Partnership. Accessed March 24, 2017, https://bus.wisc.edu/_lightbox/global/popup.aspx?guid=%7BE3E48D91-D575-453A-8603-6F5A69665AAE%7D.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.