Quantile Evaluation, Sensitivity to Bracketing, and Sharing Business Payoffs

References

• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2012) Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B 26(2):211–252.Google Scholar
• Campbell JY, Lo AW, MacKinlay AC (1997) The Econometrics of Financial Markets (Princeton University Press, Princton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cervera JL, Muñoz J (1996) Proper scoring rules for fractiles. Bernardo JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM, eds. Bayesian Statistics 5 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK),513–519.Google Scholar
• CrowdANALYTIX (2014) Global energy forecasting competition 2014 probabilistic electric load forecasting. https://crowdanalytix.com/contests/global-energy-forecasting-competition-2014-probabilistic-electric-load-forecasting.Google Scholar
• Ehm W, Jordan A, Krueger F, Gneiting T (2016) Of quantiles and expectiles: Consistent scoring functions, choquet representations and forecast rankings. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (Statist. Methodology) 78(3):505–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emmer S, Tasche M, Kratz M (2015) What is the best risk measure in practice? A comparison of standard measures. J. Risk 18(2):31–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fissler T, Ziegel JF (2016) Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle. Ann. Statist. 44(4):1680–1707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T (2011a) Quantiles as optimal point forecasts. Internat. J. Forecasting 27(2):197–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T (2011b) Making and evaluating point forecasts. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(494):746–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T, Raftery A (2007) Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102(477):359–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T, Ranjan R (2011) Comparing density forecasts using threshold- and quantile-weighted scoring rules. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(3):411–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyndman R (2014) Global energy forecasting competitions. http://robjhyndman.com/hyndsight/gefcom2014/.Google Scholar
• Johnstone DJ, Jose VRR, Winkler RL (2011) Tailored scoring rules for probabilities. Decision Anal. 8(4):256–268.Link, Google Scholar
• Jose VRR, Winkler RL (2009) Evaluating quantile assessments. Oper. Res. 57(5):1287–1297.Link, Google Scholar
• Kadane JB, Winkler RL (1988) Separating probability elicitation from utilities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83(402):357–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenker R (2005) Quantile Regression (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenker R, Bassett G Jr (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrick RP, Soll JB (2006) Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Sci. 52(1):111–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Lichtendahl KC Jr, Winkler RL (2007) Probability elicitation, scoring rules, and competition among forecasters. Management Sci. 53(11):1745–1755.Link, Google Scholar
• Lichtendahl KC Jr, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Winkler RL (2013) Is it better to average probabilities or quantiles? Management Sci. 59(7):1594–1611.Link, Google Scholar
• Matheson JE, Winkler RL (1976) Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions. Management Sci. 22(10):1087–1096.Link, Google Scholar
• Murphy AH, Winkler RL (1984) Probability forecasting in meteorology. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 79(387):489–500.Google Scholar
• Petruzzi NC, Dada M (1999) Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Oper. Res. 47(2):183–194.Link, Google Scholar
• Saerens M (2000) Building cost functions minimizing to some summary statistics. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 11(6):1263–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1971) Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66(336):783–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas EAC, Ross BH (1980) On appropriate procedures for combining probability distributions within the same family. J. Math. Psych. 21(2):136–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (1979) Eliciting production possibilities from a well-informed manager. J. Econom. Theory 20(3):360–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL (1996) Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities. Test 5(1):1–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL, Murphy AH (1970) Nonlinear utility and the probability score. J. Appl. Meteorology 9(1):143–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL, Roodman GM, Britney RR (1972) The determination of partial moments. Management Sci. 19(3):290–296.Link, Google Scholar