Flexible Queueing Architectures

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2017.1620

References

  • Bassamboo A, Randhawa RS, Mieghem JAV (2012) A little flexibility is all you need: On the asymptotic value of flexible capacity in parallel queuing systems. Oper. Res. 60(6):1423–1435.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell SL, Williams RJ (2001) Dynamic scheduling of a system with two parallel servers in heavy traffic with resource pooling: Asymptotic optimality of a threshold policy. Ann. Appl. Probab. 11(3):608–649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown L, Gans N, Mandelbaum A, Sakov A, Shen H, Zeltyn S, Zhao L (2005) Statistical analysis of a telephone call center: A queueing-science perspective. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100(469):36–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen X, Zhang J, Zhou Y (2015) Optimal sparse designs for process flexibility via probabilistic expanders. Oper. Res. 63(5):1159–1176.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chou M, Teo C-P, Zheng H (2011) Process flexibility revisited: The graph expander and its applications. Oper. Res. 59(5):1090–1105.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chou M, Chua GA, Teo C-P, Zheng H (2010) Design for process flexibility: Efficiency of the long chain and sparse structure. Oper. Res. 58(1):43–58.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gurumurthi S, Benjaafar S (2003) Modeling and analysis of flexible queueing systems. Naval Res. Logist. 51(5):755–782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halfin S, Whitt W (1981) Heavy-traffic limits for queues with many exponential servers. Oper. Res. 29(3):567–588.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison JM, Lopez MJ (1999) Heavy traffic resource pooling in parallel-server systems. Queueing Systems 33(4):339–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoeffding W (1963) Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 58(301):13–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoory S, Linial N, Wigderson A (2006) Expander graphs and their applications. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 43(4):439–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iravani SM, Oyen MPV, Sims KT (2005) Structural flexibility: A new perspective on the design of manufacturing and service operations. Management Sci. 51(2):151–166.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan W, Graves SC (1995) Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Sci. 41(4):577–594.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kandula S, Sengupta S, Greenberg A, Patel P, Chaiken R (2009) The nature of data center traffic: Measurements and analysis. Felmann A, Mathy L, eds. Proc. 9th ACM SIGCOMM Conf. Internet Measurement, IMC ’09 (ACM, New York), 202–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kingman J (1962) Some inequalities for the queue GI/G/1. Biometrika 49(3/4):315–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunniyur S, Srikant R (2001) Analysis and design of an adaptive virtual queue (AVQ) algorithm for active queue management. Cruz RL, Varghese G, eds. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Conf., SIGCOMM ’01 (ACM, New York), 123–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leconte M, Lelarge M, Massoulie L (2012) Bipartite graph structures for efficient balancing of heterogeneous loads. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. 40(1):41–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandelbaum A, Reiman MI (1998) On pooling in queueing networks. Management Sci. 44(7):971–981.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McKeown N, Mekkittikul A, Anantharam V, Walrand J (1999) Achieving 100% throughput in an input-queued switch. IEEE Trans. Comm. 47(8):1260–1267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neely M, Modiano E, Cheng Y (2007) Logarithmic delay for n × n packet switches under the crossbar constraint. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 15(3):657–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah D, Tsitsiklis JN (2008) Bin packing with queues. J. Appl. Probab. 45(4):922–939.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simchi-Levi D, Wei Y (2012) Understanding the performance of the long chain and sparse designs in process flexibility. Oper. Res. 60(5):1125–1141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Soundararajan G, Amza C, Goel A (2006) Database replication policies for dynamic content applications. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Rev., 40(4):89–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talreja R, Whitt W (2008) Fluid models for overloaded multiclass many-server queueing systems with first-come, first-served routing. Management Sci. 54(8):1513–1527.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsitsiklis JN, Xu K (2012) On the power of (even a little) resource pooling. Stochastic Systems 2(1):1–66.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsitsiklis JN, Xu K (2013) Queueing system topologies with limited flexibility. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. 41(1):167–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Visschers J, Adan I, Weiss G (2012) A product form solution to a system with multi-type jobs and multi-type servers. Queueing Systems 70(3):269–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wallace R, Whitt W (2005) A staffing algorithm for call centers with skill-based routing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(4):276–294.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xu K (2014) On the power of (even a little) flexibility in dynamic resource allocation. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/91101.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.