Technical Note—Optimal Long-Term Supply Contracts with Asymmetric Demand Information

References

• Battaglini M, Lamba R (2015) Optimal dynamic contracting: The first-order approach and beyond. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Said M (2011) Dynamic auctions: A survey. Cochrane JJ, ed. Wiley Encyclopedia Operations Research and Management Science (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 1511–1522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bijvank M, Vis I (2011) Lost-sales inventory theory: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 215(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burnetas A, Gilbert S, Smith C (2007) Quantity discounts in single-period supply contracts with asymmetric demand information. IIE Trans. 29(5):465–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon G, Lariviere M (2001) Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. 47(5):629–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui T, Raju J, Zhang Z (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Ëso P, Szentes B (2007) Optimal information disclosure in auctions and the handicap auction. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(3):705–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha A (2001) Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. 48(1):41–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kakade S, Lobel I, Nazerzadeh H (2013) Optimal dynamic mechanism design and the virtual-pivot mechanism. Oper. Res. 61(4):837–854.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Chen K, Erhun F (2011) Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information: An experimental evaluation. Management Sci. 57(4):689–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Wu D (2009) Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Sci. 55(12):1953–1968.Link, Google Scholar
• Krähmer D, Strausz R (2015) Ex post information rents in sequential screening. Games Econom. Behav. 90:257–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx L, Shaffer G (2010) Slotting allowances and scarce shelf space. J. Econ. Management Strat. 19(3):575–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Myerson R (1986) Multistage games with communications. Econometrica 54(2):323–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nazerzadeh H, Perakis G (2011) Menu pricing competition with private capacity constraints. Shoham Y, Chen Y, Roughgarden T, eds. Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, EC '11 (ACM, New York), 371–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavan A, Segal I, Toikka J (2014) Dynamic mechanism design: A Myersonian approach. Econometrica 82(2):601–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perakis G, Thraves C (2016) A two-part tariff pricing approach for services: A data driven approach. In preparation, MIT.Google Scholar
• Ren Z, Cohen M, Ho T, Terwiesch C (2010) Sharing forecast information in a long-term supply chain relationship: The role of customer review strategy. Oper. Res. 58(1):81–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Shin H, Tunca T (2010) Do firms invest in forecasting efficiently? The effect of competition on demand forecast investments and supply chain coordination. Oper. Res. 58(6):1592–1610.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor T, Xiao W (2010) Does a manufacturer benefit from selling to a better-forecasting retailer? Management Sci. 56(9):1584–1598.Link, Google Scholar
• Xin L, Goldberg D (2016) Optimality gap of constant-order policies decays exponentially in the lead time for lost sales models. Oper. Res. 64(6):1556–1565.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Nagarajan M, Sosic G (2010) Optimal dynamic supplier contracts under asymmetric inventory information. Oper. Res. 58(5):1380–1397.Link, Google Scholar