Characterizing Rational Transplant Program Response to Outcome-Based Regulation

References

• Abecassis MM, Burke R, Cosimi AB, Matas AJ, Merion RM, Millman D, Roberts JP, et al. (2008) Transplant center regulations: A mixed blessing? An ASTS council viewpoint. Amer. J. Transplantation 8:2496–2502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abecassis MM, Burke R, Klintmalm GB, Matas AJ, Merion RM, Millman D, Olthoff K, et al. (2009) American Society of Transplant Surgeons transplant center outcomes requirements: A threat to innovation. Amer. J. Transplantation 9:1279–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akan M, Alagoz O, Ata B, Erenay FS, Said A (2012) A broader view of designing the liver allocation system. Oper. Res. 60(4):757–770.Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2007a) Choosing among living-donor and cadaveric livers. Management Sci. 53(11):1702–1715.Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2007b) Determining the acceptance of cadaveric livers using an implicit model of the waiting list. Oper. Res. 55(1):24–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Andreoni KA (2020) Now is the time for the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) to change regulatory policy to effectively increase transplantation in the United States; carpe diem. Amer. J. Transplantation 20(8):2026–2029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beliën J, De Boeck L, Colpaert J, Devesse S, Van den Bossche F (2013) Optimizing the facility location design of organ transplant centers. Decision Support Systems 54:1568–1579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buccini LD, Segev DL, Fung J, Miller C, Kelly D, Quintini C, Schold JD (2014) Association between liver transplant center performance evaluations and transplant volume. Amer. J. Transplantation 14(9):2097–2105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan EY, Nguyen DT, Kaleekal TS, Goodarzi A, Graviss EA, Gaber AO (2019) The Houston Methodist lung transplant risk model: A validated tool for pre-transplant risk assessment. Ann. Thoracic Surgery 108(4):1094–1100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Symonds GH (1958) Cost horizons and certainty equivalents: An approach to stochastic programming of heating oil. Management Sci. 4(3):235–263.Link, Google Scholar
• CMS (2020) Value-based programs. Retrieved March 10, 2021, https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/Value-Based-Programs.Google Scholar
• Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J. Royal Statist. Soc. [Series A] 34:197–220.Google Scholar
• Davis A, Mehrotra S, Friedewald J, Ladner D (2013) Characteristics of a simulation model of the national kidney transplantation system. Proc. Winter Simulations Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2320–2329.Google Scholar
• Davis AE, Mehrotra S, Friedewald JJ, Daskin MS, Skaro AI, Abecassis MM, Ladner DP (2015) Improving geographic equity in kidney transplantation using alternative kidney sharing and optimization modeling. Medical Decision Making 35(6):797–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamond JM, Lee JC, Kawut SM, Shah RJ, Localio AR, Bellamy SL, Lederer DJ, et al. (2013) Clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Amer. J. Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 187(5):527–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickinson DM, Arrington CJ, Fant G, Levine GN, Schaubel DE, Pruett TL, Roberts MS, et al. (2008) SRTR program-specific reports on outcomes: A guide for the new reader. Amer. J. Transplantation 8(2):1012–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickinson DM, Shearon TH, O’Keefe J, Wong HH, Berg CL, Rosendale JD, Delmonico FL, et al. (2006) SRTR center-specific reporting tools: Posttransplant outcomes. Amer. J. Transplantation 6(2):1198–1211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrow RP (2016) Stochastic Processes in R and Mathematica (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dolgin NH, Movahedi B, Martins PN, Goldberg R, Lapane KL, Anderson FA, Bozorgzadeh A (2016) Decade-long trends in liver transplant waitlist removal due to illness severity: The impact of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services policy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 222(6):1054–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurobi Optimization LLC (2019) Gurobi optimizer reference manual. Accessed October 17, 2023, https://www.gurobi.com.Google Scholar
• Hamilton TE (2013) Regulatory oversight in transplantation: Are the patients really better off? Current Opinion Organ Transplantation 18(2):203–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton TE (2016) Solid transplant programs–outcome thresholds–revised guidelines. https://go.cms.gov/2FuN7Lh.Google Scholar
• Hillestad RJ, Jacobsen SE (1980) Linear programs with an additional reverse convex constraint. Appl. Math. Optim. 6(1):257–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho B, Skaro IA, Abecassis MM (2015) Should both UNOS and CMS provide regulatory oversight in kidney transplantation? Current Transplantation Rep. 2(2):127–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard DH, Kaplan B (2006) Do report cards influence hospital choice? The case of kidney transplantation. Inquiry 43:150–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard RJ, Cornell DL, Schold JD (2009) CMS oversight, OPOs and transplant centers and the law of unintended consequences. Clinical Transplantation 23:778–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joyce DL, Li Z, Edwards LB, Kobashigawa JA, Daly RC (2018) Predicting 1-year cardiac transplantation survival using a donor-recipient risk-assessment tool. J. Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery 155(4):1580–1590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasiske BL, Salkowski N, Wey A, Israni AK, Snyder JJ (2016) Potential implications of recent and proposed changes in the regulatory oversight of solid organ transplantation in the United States. Amer. J. Transplantation 16(12):3371–3377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasiske BL, McBride MA, Cornell DL, Gaston RS, Henry ML, Irwin FD, Israni AK, et al. (2012) Report of a consensus conference on transplant program quality and surveillance. Amer. J. Transplantation 12:1988–1996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilambi V, Mehrotra S (2017) Improving liver allocation using optimized neighborhoods. Transplantation 101(2):350–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kong N, Schaefer AJ, Hunsaker BK, Roberts MS (2010) Maximizing the efficiency of the U. S. liver allocation system through region redesign. Management Sci. 56(12):2111–2122.Link, Google Scholar
• Kremers WM (2014) Impact of the scientific registry of transplant recipients’ new bayesian method on estimating center effects and flagging of centers as worse than expected. Amer. J. Transplantation 14:1703–1704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehr CJ, Skeans M, Valapour M (2019) Validating thoracic simulated allocation model predictions for impact of broader geographic sharing of donor lungs on transplant waitlist outcomes. J. Heart Lung Transplantation 39(5):433–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massie AB, Segev DL (2013) Rates of false flagging due to statistical artifact in CMS evaluations of transplant programs: Results of a stochastic simulation. Amer. J. Transplantation 13:2044–2051.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDiarmid SV, Pruett TL, Graham WK (2008) The oversight of solid organ transplantation in the United States. Amer. J. Transplantation 8:739–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nassir AB, Dean CE, Li S, Salkowski N, Solid CA, Schnitzler MA, Snyder JJ, et al. (2015) Variation in cost and quality in kidney transplantation. Transplantation 99(10):2150–2157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• OPTN (2019) OPTN bylaws. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/media/1201/optn-bylaws-effective-dec-3-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
• OPTN Database (2021) The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data.Google Scholar
• Pelletier RP, Phillips G, Rajab A, Pesavento TE, Henry M (2014) Effects of cardiovascular comorbidity adjustment on SRTR risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models of graft survival. Transplantation 97(6):686–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieloch D, Dombrovskiy V, Osband AJ, DebRoy M, Mann RA, Fernandez S, Mondal Z, et al. (2015) The Kidney Transplant Morbidity Index (KTMI): A simple prognostic tool to help determine outcome risk in kidney transplant candidates. Progress Transplantation 25(1):70–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo MJ, Davies RR, Hong KN, Iribarne A, Kawut S, Bacchetta M, D’Ovidio F, et al. (2009) Who is the high-risk recipient? Predicting mortality after lung transplantation using pretransplant risk factors. J. Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery 138(5):1234–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salkowski N, Snyder JJ, Zaun DA, Leighton T, Israni AK, Kasiske BL (2014a) Bayesian methods for assessing transplant program performance. Amer. J. Transplantation 14:1271–1276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salkowski N, Snyder JJ, Zaun DA, Leighton T, Edwards EB, Israni AK, Kasiske BL (2014b) A scientific registry of transplant recipients. Bayesian method for identifying underperforming transplant programs. Amer. J. Transplantation 14:1310–1317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandikçi B, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2013) Alleviating the patient’s price of privacy through a partially observable waiting list. Management Sci. 59(8):1836–1854.Link, Google Scholar
• Sandikçi B, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Alagoz O, Roberts MS (2008) Estimating the patient’s price of privacy in liver transplantation. Oper. Res. 56(6):1393–1410.Link, Google Scholar
• Schold JA, Axelrod DA (2014) Changing our prior assumptions: Adapting to new Bayesian transplant center report cards. Amer. J. Transplantation 14:1231–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schold JD (2020) The evolving role of regulatory reporting on patient and donor selection in organ transplantation. Current Opinion Organ Transplantation 25(2):158–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schold JD, Arrington CJ, Levine G (2010) Significant alterations in reported clinical practice associated with increased oversight of organ transplant center performance. Progress Transplantation 20(3):279–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schold JD, Buccini LD, Srinivas TR, Srinivas RT, Poggio ED, Flechner SM, Soria C, et al. (2013) The association of center performance evaluations and kidney transplant volume in the United States. Amer. J. Transplantation 13:67–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segev DL, Gentry SE, Melancon JK, Montgomery RA (2005a) Characterization of waiting times in a simulation of kidney paired donation. Amer. J. Transplantation 5(10):2448–2455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segev DL, Gentry SE, Warren DS, Reeb B, Montgomery RA (2005b) Kidney paired donation and optimizing the use of live donor organs. JAMA 293(15):1883–1890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shechter SM, Bryce CM, Alagoz O, Kreke JE, Stahl JE, Schaefer AJ, Angus DC, et al. (2005) A clinically based discrete event simulation of end-stage liver disease and the organ allocation process. Medical Decision Making 25(2):199–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• SRTR (2019a) Program-specific reports. https://www.srtr.org/reports-tools/program-specific-reports/.Google Scholar
• SRTR (2019b) Technical methods for the program-specific reports. https://www.srtr.org/about-the-data/technical-methods-for-the-program-specific-reports/.Google Scholar
• Stahl JE, Kong N, Shechter SM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2005) A methodological framework for optimally reorganizing liver transplant regions. Medical Decision Making 25(1):35–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zenios SA (2006) Recipient choice can address the efficiency-equity trade-off in kidney transplantation: A mechanism design model. Management Sci. 52(11):1647–1660.Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson D, Waisanen L, Wolfe R, Merion RM, McCullough K, Rodgers A (2004) Simulating the allocation of organs for transplantation. Health Care Management Sci. 7(4):331–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• UNOS (2018) Visit from the MPSC? “Don’t freak out.” Retrieved March 10, 2021, https://unos.org/news/visit-from-the-mpsc-dont-freak-out/.Google Scholar
• Vielma JP, Nemhauser GL (2011) Modeling disjunctive constraints with a logarithmic number of binary variables and constraints. Math. Programming 128(1–2):49–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wald A (1944) On cumulative sums of random variables. Ann. Math. Statist. 15(3):283–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinhandl ED, Snyder JJ, Israni AK, Kasiske BL (2009) Effect of comborbidity adjustment on CMS criteria for kidney transplant center performance. Amer. J. Transplantation 9:506–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White SL, Zinsser DM, Paul M, Levine GN, Shearon T, Ashby VB, Magee JC, et al. (2015) Patient selection and volume in the era surrounding implementation of Medicare conditions of participation for transplant programs. Health Services Res. 50(2):330–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright DR (2016) Transplant centers: Citation for outcome requirements. https://go.cms.gov/2G0a3Q9.Google Scholar
• Zahiri B, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Mohammadi M, Jula P (2014) Multi-objective design of an organ transplant network under uncertainty. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 72:101–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenios SA, Chertow GM, Wein LM (2000) Dynamic allocation of kidneys to candidates on the transplant waiting list. Oper. Res. 48(4):549–569.Link, Google Scholar