Work Package Sizing and Project Performance

References

• Bai Y, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Chen L (2009) Designing domain work breakdown structure (DWBS) using neural networks. Yu W, He H, Zhang N, eds. Advances in Neural Networks—ISNN 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5533 (Springer, Berlin), 1146–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baxendale AT (1991) Management information systems: The use of work breakdown structure in the integration of time and cost. Bezelga A, Brandon P, eds. Management, Quality and Economics in Building (E & FN Spon, London), 14–23.Google Scholar
• Beck JC, Prosser P, Selensky E (2003) Vehicle routing and job shop scheduling: What’s the difference? Proc. 13th Internat. Conf. Automated Planning Scheduling (AAAI, Menlo Park), 267–276.Google Scholar
• Beck K, Beedle M, van Bennekum A, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M, et al.. (2001) Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Retrieved March 4, 2018, http://www.agilemanifesto.org.Google Scholar
• Bounds A (2009) North-west: Aerospace. Financial times (October 28), https://www.ft.com/content/ffde7616-c332-11de-8eca-00144feab49a.Google Scholar
• Brown RA (1978) Probabilistic models of project management with design implications. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 25(2):43–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danilovic M (2006) Bring your suppliers into your projects—Managing the design of work packages in product development. J. Purchasing Supply Management 12(5):246–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dayanand N, Padman R (2001) Project contracts and payment schedules: The client’s problem. Management Sci. 47(12):1654–1667.Link, Google Scholar
• De P, Dunne EJ, Ghosh JB, Wells CE (1997) Complexity of the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem for project networks. Oper. Res. 45(2):302–306.Link, Google Scholar
• Deckro RF, Hebert JE, Verdini WA (1992) Project scheduling with work packages. Omega 20(2):169–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demeulemeester EL, Herroelen WS (2002) Project Scheduling: A Research Handbook (Kluwer, Boston).Google Scholar
• Devi TR, Reddy VS (2012) Work breakdown structure of the project. Internat. J. Engrg. Res. Appl. 2(2):683–686.Google Scholar
• DOD and NASA (1962) DOD and NASA Guide: PERT COST Systems Design (Office of the Secretary of Defense/National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Dreyfus SE, Law AM (1977) The Art and Theory of Dynamic Programming (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Eldin NN (1991) Management of engineering/design phase. J. Construction Engrg. Management 117(1):163–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby SE, Kamburowski J (1992) The analysis of activity networks under generalized precedence relations (GPRs). Management Sci. 38(9):1245–1263.Link, Google Scholar
• Espina D (2011) Reply to “What is the right approach to work package size?” Project Management Stack Exchange, (May 3), http://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/2003/what-is-the-right-approach-to-work-package-size.Google Scholar
• Gardner GR (2006) Effective construction work packages. 2006 AACE Internat. Trans. (AACE International, Morgantown, WV), 13.1–13.10.Google Scholar
• Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (W. H. Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
• Globerson S (1994) Impact of various work-breakdown structures on project conceptualization. Internat. J. Project Management 12(3):165–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golany B, Shtub A (2001) Work breakdown structure. Salvendy G, ed. Handbook of Industrial Engineering: Technology and Operations Management, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 1263–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldratt EM (1997) The Critical Chain (North River Press, Great Barrington, MA).Google Scholar
• Golpayegani SAH, Emamizadeh B (2007) Designing work breakdown structures using modular neural networks. Decision Support Systems 44(1):202–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall NG (2012) Project management: Recent developments and research opportunities. J. Systems Sci. Systems Engrg. 21(2):129–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall NG (2015) Further research opportunities in project management. Schwindt C, Zimmermann J, eds. Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 945–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall NG (2016) Research and teaching opportunities in project management. Gupta A, Capponi A, eds. Optimization Challenges in Complex, Networked and Risky Systems, TutORials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 329–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Harpum P (2007) Project control. Morris PWG, Pinto JK, eds. The Wiley Guide to Project Control (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaskowski P, Sabotka A (2006) Multicriteria construction project scheduling method using evolutionary algorithm. Oper. Res. An Internat. J. 6(3):283–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia P, Gao Q, Ji X, Xu T (2014) Task decomposition method of R&D project based on product structure tree. J. Software 9(7):1894–1902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung Y, Woo S (2004) Flexible work breakdown structure for integrated cost and schedule control. J. Construction Engrg. Management 130(5):616–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kastner R (2001) Reply to “The standard for work packages.” Project Management Central, (July 17), http://www.projectmanagement.com/discussion-topic/2031/The-standard-for-work-packages- ?sort=desc&pageNum=2.Google Scholar
• Kelley JE Jr, Walker MR (1959) Critical-path planning and scheduling. 1959 Proc. Eastern Joint Comput. Conf. (ACM, New York), 160–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennemer B (2002) Define and schedule tasks in Microsoft Project. Tech Republic (September 18), http://www.techrepublic.com/article/define-and-schedule-tasks-in-microsoft-project/.Google Scholar
• Kerzner H (2017) Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 12th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Klastorin T (2011) Project Management: Tools and Trade-offs (Pearson, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lee J, Deng W-Y, Lee W-T, Lee S-J, Hsu K-H, Ma S-P (2010) Integrating process and work breakdown structure with design structure matrix. J. Adv. Comput. Intelligence Intelligent Informatics 14(5):512–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Ren N (2013) Work breakdown and service access in cloud manufacturing environment based on knowledge sharing. J. Convergence Inform. Tech. 8(6):771–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luby RE, Peel D, Swahl W (1995) Component-based work breakdown structure. Project Management J. 26(4):38–43.Google Scholar
• McVey J (2001) Reply to “The standard for work packages.” Project Management Central (May 18), http://www.projectmanagement.com/discussion-topic/2031/The-standard-for-work-packages-?sort=desc&pageNum=2.Google Scholar
• Monnappa A (2018) Project scope management: The importance of work packages. Simplilearn (July 6), http://www.simplilearn.com/project-scope-management-work-package-article.Google Scholar
• Mubarak S (2015) Construction Project Scheduling and Control, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nicholas JM, Steyn H (2017) Project Management for Engineering, Business and Technology, 5th ed. (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popescu CM, Charoenngam C (1995) Project Planning, Scheduling, and Control in Construction: An Encyclopedia of Terms and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Potts CN, Baker KR (1989) Flow shop scheduling with lot streaming. Oper. Res. Lett. 8(6):297–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell M (2010) Project control. Harpum P, ed. Portfolio, Program, and Project Management in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 101–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (2008) Should you be teaching project management? Report, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA. Retrieved March 4, 2018, http://www.mosaicprojects.com.au/PDF/Why_teach_PM.pdf.Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (2013) Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 5th ed. (Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA).Google Scholar
• Raz T, Globerson S (1998) Effective sizing and content definition of work packages. Project Management J. 29(4):17–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren N, Xue J, Wang Y (2013) The task decoupling study on work breakdown structure of complex product. Yarlagadda P, Yang S-F, Lee KM, eds. Information Technology Applications in Industry II, Appl. Mech. Materials (Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland), 411–414:2486–2491.Google Scholar
• Roche K (2010) Reply to “The standard for work packages.” Project Management Central (August 26), http://www.projectmanagement.com/discussion-topic/2031/The-standard-for-work-packages- ?sort=desc&pageNum=1.Google Scholar
• Trietsch D, Baker KR (1993) Basic techniques for lot streaming. Oper. Res. 41(6):1065–1076.Link, Google Scholar
• Vanhoucke M, Coelho J, Batselier J (2016) An overview of project data for integrated project management and control. J. Modern Project Management 3(3):6–21.Google Scholar
• Vanhoucke M, Coelho J, Debels D, Maenhout B, Tavares LV (2008) An evaluation of the adequacy of project network generators with systematically sampled networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187(2):511–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang JF, Liu JH, Zhong YF (2005) A novel ant colony algorithm for assembly sequence planning. Internat. J. Adv. Manufacturing Tech. 25(11–12):1137–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilmot J (2011) Reply to “What is the right approach to work package size?” Project Management Stack Exchange, (May 3), http://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/2003/what-is-the-right-approach-to-work-package-size.Google Scholar
• Wysocki RK (2014) Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme, 7th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Yang KK, Talbot FB, Patterson JH (1992) Scheduling a project to maximize its net present value: An integer programming approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 64(2):188–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu T-L, Goldberg DE, Sastry K, Lima CF, Pelikan M (2009) Dependency structure matrix, genetic algorithms, and effective recombination. Evolutionary Comput. 17(4):595–626.Crossref, Google Scholar