Ration Gaming and the Bullwhip Effect
Published Online:18 Mar 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1774
References
- (1999) The dynamics of markups and inventories in retailing firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(2):275–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Swapping the nested fixed point algorithm: A class of estimators for discrete Markov decision models. Econometrica 70(4):1519–1543.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Dynamic discrete choice structural models: A survey. J. Econometrics 156(1):38–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Practical methods for estimation of dynamic discrete choice models. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):363–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Finite mixture distributions, sequential likelihood and the EM algorithm. Econometrica 71(3):933–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Conditional choice probability estimation of dynamic discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica 79(6):1823–1867.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) The impact of duplicate orders on demand estimation and capacity investment. Management Sci. 51(10):1505–1518.Link, Google Scholar
- (1991) Taking stock: A critical assessment of recent research on inventories. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1):73–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Retail inventory behavior and business fluctuations. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1981(2):443–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Strong convergence and dynamic economic models. Quant. Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 58(5):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Production smoothing and the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(2):208–220.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance. Management Sci. 45(8):1091–1108.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) In search of the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):457–479.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Information sharing and supply chain coordination. Graves SC, de Kok AG, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 11 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 341–421.Google Scholar
- (2001) Optimal policies for multiechelon inventory problems with Markov-modulated demand. Oper. Res. 49(2):226–234.Link, Google Scholar
- (1994) Evaluating echelon stock (R, nQ) policies in serial production/inventory systems with stochastic demand. Management Sci. 40(10):1262–1275.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Bullwhip effect measurement and its implications. Oper. Res. 60(4):771–784.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Measuring the bullwhip effect: Discrepancy and alignment between information and material flows. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(1):36–51.Link, Google Scholar
- (1989) Some empirical evidence on the production level and production cost smoothing models of inventory investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(4):853–864.Google Scholar
- (2003) Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(1):5–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management Internat. J. 5(2):78–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) An empirical model of inventory investment by durable commodity intermediaries. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy 52(1):171–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Measuring the implications of sales and consumer inventory behavior. Econometrica 74(6):1637–1673.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Inventories and the volatility of production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77(4):667–679.Google Scholar
- (1995) Burned by busy signals: Why Motorola ramped up production way past demand. Business Week (March 6), 36.Google Scholar
- (2012) Information sharing in supply chains: An overview. Procedia Engrg. 38(C):2147–2154.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Bullwhip in a Spanish shop. Harvard NOM Working Paper no. 06-06, Harvard Business School Negotiation, Organizations and Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (1997a) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997b) The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Rev. 38(3):93–102.Google Scholar
- (1992) The role of inventory in delivery-time competition. Management Sci. 38(2):182–197.Link, Google Scholar
- (1961) Manufacturers’ inventories, sales expectations, and the acceleration principle. Econometrica 29(3):293–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Joint production, quasi-fixed factors of production, and investment in finished goods inventories. J. Money Credit Banking 16(2):218–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1941) The nature and stability of inventory cycles. Rev. Econom. Statist. 23(3):113–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Seasonality, cost shocks, and the production smoothing model of inventories. Econometrica 56(4):877–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Engle RF, McFadden DL, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 4 (North Holland, Amsterdam), 3081–3143.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) I’m not hoarding, I’m just stocking up before the hoarders get here. Behavioral causes of phantom ordering in supply chains. J. Oper. Management 39–40:6–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Missed signals: Behind Cisco’s woes are some wounds of its own making. Wall Street Journal (April 18), A1.Google Scholar
- (1965) The optimal inventory policy for batch ordering. Oper. Res. 13(3):424–432.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Analysis of batch ordering inventory models with setup cost and capacity constraint. Internat. J. Production Econom. 155:340–350.Crossref, Google Scholar

