Recovering Best Statistical Guarantees via the Empirical Divergence-Based Distributionally Robust Optimization

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1786

References

  • Adler RJ (1990) An Introduction to Continuity, Extrema, and Related Topics for General Gaussian Processes, Lecture Notes—Monograph Series (Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA).Google Scholar
  • Adler RJ, Taylor JE (2007) Random Fields and Geometry (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • Adler R, Taylor JE (2011) Topological Complexity of Smooth Random Functions (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler RJ, Blanchet JH, Liu J (2012) Efficient Monte Carlo for high excursions of Gaussian random fields. Ann. Appl. Probab. 22(3):1167–1214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler RJ, Taylor JE, Worsley KJ (2009) Applications of random fields and geometry: Foundations and case studies. Accessed May 30, 2016, http://webee.technion.ac.il/people/adler/hrf.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Agresti A (2013) Categorical Data Analysis, 3rd ed., Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Atlason J, Epelman MA, Henderson SG (2004) Call center staffing with simulation and cutting plane methods. Ann. Oper. Res. 127(1–4):333–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Den Hertog D, De Waegenaere A, Melenberg B, Rennen G (2013) Robust solutions of optimization problems affected by uncertain probabilities. Management Sci. 59(2):341–357.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Gupta V, Kallus N (2018) Robust sample average approximation. Math. Programming 171(1/2):217–282.Google Scholar
  • Blanchet J, Kang Y (2016) Sample out-of-sample inference based on Wasserstein distance. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Blanchet J, Murthy K (2019) Quantifying distributional model risk via optimal transport. Math. Oper. Res. 44(2):565–600.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blanchet J, Kang Y, Murthy K (2016) Robust Wasserstein profile inference and applications to machine learning. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Chen J, Huang Y (2013) Finite-sample properties of the adjusted empirical likelihood. J. Nonparametric Statist. 25(1):147–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox DR, Hinkley DV (1974) Theoretical Statistics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DiCiccio T, Hall P, Romano J (1991) Empirical likelihood is Bartlett-correctable. Ann. Statist. 19(2):1053–1061.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duchi J, Glynn P, Namkoong H (2019) Statistics of robust optimization: A generalized empirical likelihood approach. Math. Oper. Res. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Esfahani PM, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171(1/2):115–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fábián CI (2008) Handling CVaR objectives and constraints in two-stage stochastic models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191(3):888–911.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabrel V, Murat C, Thiele A (2014) Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235(3):471–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao R, Kleywegt AJ (2016) Distributionally robust stochastic optimization with Wasserstein distance. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Goh J, Sim M (2010) Distributionally robust optimization and its tractable approximations. Oper. Res. 58(4-part-1):902–917.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gotoh JY, Kim MJ, Lim AE (2018) Robust empirical optimization is almost the same as mean-variance optimization. Oper. Res. Lett. 46(4):448–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta V (2019) Near-optimal ambiguity sets for distributionally robust optimization. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print March 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3140.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu Z, Hong LJ (2013) Kullback-Leibler divergence constrained distributionally robust optimization. Optim. Online. Available at http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2012/11/3677.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Jiang R, Guan Y (2016) Data-driven chance constrained stochastic program. Math. Programming 158(1/2):291–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krokhmal P, Palmquist J, Uryasev S (2002) Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. J. Risk 4(2):43–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22(1):79–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lam H (2016) Robust sensitivity analysis for stochastic systems. Math. Oper. Res. 41(4):1248–1275.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lam H (2018) Sensitivity to serial dependency of input processes: A robust approach. Management Sci. 64(3):1311–1327.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lam H, Qian H (2016) The empirical likelihood approach to simulation input uncertainty. Proc. 2016 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 791–802.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lam H, Zhou E (2015) Quantifying uncertainty in sample average approximation. Proc. 2015 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 3846–3857.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lam H, Zhou E (2017) The empirical likelihood approach to quantifying uncertainty in sample average approximation. Oper. Res. Lett. 45(4):301–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lang A, Potthoff J (2011) Fast simulation of Gaussian random fields. Monte Carlo Methods Appl. 17(3):195–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Chen J (2010) Adjusted empirical likelihood with high-order precision. Ann. Statist. 38(3):1341–1362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Love D, Bayraksan G (2015) Phi-divergence constrained ambiguous stochastic programs for data-driven optimization. Technical report, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  • Luedtke J, Ahmed S (2008) A sample approximation approach for optimization with probabilistic constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 19(2):674–699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maurer A, Pontil M (2009) Empirical Bernstein bounds and sample variance penalization. arXiv:0907.3740.Google Scholar
  • Moon K, Hero A (2014) Multivariate f-divergence estimation with confidence. Proc. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 2420–2428.Google Scholar
  • Nagaraj K, Pasupathy R (2014) Stochastically constrained simulation optimization on integer-ordered spaces: The cgR-SPLINE algorithm. Technical report, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  • Namkoong H, Duchi JC (2017) Variance-based regularization with convex objectives. Proc. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 2975–2984.Google Scholar
  • Nguyen X, Wainwright MJ, Jordan MI (2008) Estimating divergence functionals and the likelihood ratio by penalized convex risk minimization. Proc. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 1089–1096.Google Scholar
  • Owen AB (1988) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 75(2):237–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owen AB (2001) Empirical Likelihood (CRC Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pál D, Póczos B, Szepesvári C (2010) Estimation of Rényi entropy and mutual information based on generalized nearest-neighbor graphs. Proc. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 1849–1857.Google Scholar
  • Pardo L (2005) Statistical Inference Based on Divergence Measures (CRC Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2009) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory, vol. 16 (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsao M (2004a) Bounds on coverage probabilities of the empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann. Statist. 32(3):1215–1221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsao M (2004b) A new method of calibration for the empirical loglikelihood ratio. Statist. Probab. Lett. 68(3):305–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsao M, Wu F (2013) Empirical likelihood on the full parameter space. Ann. Statist. 41(4):2176–2196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van der Vaart AW, Wellner JA (1996) Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications in Statistics (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Ahmed S (2008) Sample average approximation of expected value constrained stochastic programs. Oper. Res. Lett. 36(5):515–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Z, Glynn PW, Ye Y (2015) Likelihood robust optimization for data-driven problems. Comput. Management Sci. 13(2):241–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Sim M (2014) Distributionally robust convex optimization. Oper. Res. 62(6):1358–1376.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wood AT, Chan G (1994) Simulation of stationary Gaussian processes in [0,1]d. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. 3(4):409–432.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.