Pricing and Prioritizing Time-Sensitive Customers with Heterogeneous Demand Rates

References

• Afèche P (2004) Incentive-compatible revenue management in queueing systems: Optimal strategic idleness and other delay tactics. Technical report, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Afèche P (2013) Incentive-compatible revenue management in queueing systems: Optimal strategic delay. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):423–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Afèche P, Araghi M, Baron O (2017) Customer acquisition, retention, and service access quality: Optimal advertising, capacity level, and capacity allocation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(4):674–691.Link, Google Scholar
• Afèche P, Baron O, Kerner Y (2013) Pricing time-sensitive services based on realized performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):492–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Allon G, Federgruen A (2009) Competition in service industries with segmented markets. Management Sci. 55(4):619–634.Link, Google Scholar
• Boyaci T, Ray S (2003) Product differentiation and capacity cost interaction in time and price sensitive markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(1):18–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Feldman P (2011) Pricing services subject to congestion: Charge per-use fees or sell subscriptions? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):244–260.Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Green L, Savin S (2008) Reducing delays for medical appointments: A queueing approach. Oper. Res. 56(6):1526–1538.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo P, Zhang ZG (2013) Strategic queueing behavior and its impact on system performance in service systems with the congestion-based staffing policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(1):118–131.Link, Google Scholar
• Hassin R (1995) Decentralized regulation of a queue. Management Sci. 41(1):163–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Hassin R (2016) Rational Queueing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassin R, Haviv M (2003) To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyman DP, Sobel MJ (1982) Stochastic Models in Operations Research, vol. 1 (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Hsu V, Xu S, Jukic B (2009) Optimal scheduling and incentive compatible pricing for a service system with quality of service guarantees. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(3):375–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Katta A, Sethuraman J (2005) Pricing strategies and service differentiation in queuesa profit maximization perspective. Technical report, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Lariviere MA, Mieghem JAV (2004) Strategically seeking service: How competition can generate Poisson arrivals. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(1):23–40.Link, Google Scholar
• Lederer P, Li L (1997) Pricing, production, scheduling and delivery-time competition. Oper. Res. 45(3):407–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Maglaras C, Yao J, Zeevi A (2014) Revenue maximization in queues via service differentiation. Technical report, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Maglaras C, Zeevi A (2005) Pricing and design of differentiated services: Approximate analysis and structural insights. Oper. Res. 53(2):242–262.Link, Google Scholar
• Masuda Y, Whang S (2006) On the optimality of fixed-up-to tariff for telecommunications service. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):247–253.Link, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H (1985) Pricing computer services: Queueing effects. Commun. ACM 28(3):312–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H, Whang S (1990) Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the m/m/1 queue. Oper. Res. 38(5):870–883.Link, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1997) Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Naor P (1969) On the regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica 37(1):15–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Wang Q (2013) Implications of hyperbolic discounting for optimal pricing and scheduling of unpleasant services that generate future benefits. Management Sci. 59(8):1927–1946.Link, Google Scholar
• Randhawa RS, Kumar S (2008) Usage restriction and subscription services: Operational benefits with rational users. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):429–447.Link, Google Scholar
• Rao S, Petersen ER (1998) Optimal pricing of priority services. Oper. Res. 46(1):46–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem JA (2000) Price and service discrimination in queuing systems: Incentive compatibility of gcμ scheduling. Management Sci. 46(9):1249–1267.Link, Google Scholar
• Yahalom T, Harrison JM, Kumar S (2006) Designing and pricing incentive compatible grades of service in queueing systems. Technical report, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Stecke KE, Prasad A (2012) Lead time and price quotation mode selection: Uniform or differentiated? Production Oper. Management 21(1):177–193.Crossref, Google Scholar