Spatial Pricing in Ride-Sharing Networks

References

• Afeche P, Zhe L, Maglaras C (2018) Ride-hailing networks with strategic drivers: The impact of platform control capabilities on performance. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Allon G, Bassamboo A, Çil EB (2012) Large-scale service marketplaces: The role of the moderating firm. Management Sci. 58(10): 1854–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Arnosti N, Johari R, Kanoria Y (2016) Managing congestion in decentralized matching markets. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Azevedo EM, Weyl EG (2016) Matching markets in the digital age. Science 352(6289):1056–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J, Kut CS, Tang CS, Chen X, Wang H (2018) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with inpatient customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print June 28, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0707.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Freund D, Lykouris T (2017) Pricing and optimization in shared vehicle systems: An approximation framework. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Johari R, Riquelme C (2015) Pricing in ride-sharing platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 639–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Crystal Kong G, Li X, Courcoubetis C (2019) Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 65(2):477–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Bonnans JF, Shapiro A (2013) Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Buchholz N (2017) Spatial equilibrium, search frictions and efficient regulation in the taxi industry. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Daniels KM, Lobel R (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Castillo JC, Knoepfle D, Weyl EG (2018) Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, Maskin E (1986) The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games, I: Theory. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurvich I, Lariviere M, Moreno A (2018) Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 6 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 249–278.Google Scholar
• Henderson SG, O’Mahony E, Shmoys DB (2016) (Citi)Bike sharing. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2019) Buyer uncertainty about seller capacity: Causes, consequences, and a partial solution. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Zhou Y (2016) Dynamic type matching. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Kabra A, Belavina E, Girotra K (2018) Bike-share systems: Accessibility and availability. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2017) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Lagos R (2000) An alternative approach to search frictions. J. Political Econom. 108(5):851–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lagos R (2003) An analysis of the market for taxicab rides in New York City. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(2):423–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Moreno A, Zhang DJ (2017) Pros vs joes: Agent pricing behavior in the sharing economy. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Segal I (2002) Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica 70(2):583–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozkan E, Ward AR (2017) Dynamic matching for real-time ridesharing. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou Y, Bimpikis K, Savva N (2018) Crowdsourcing exploration. Management Sci. 64(4):1477–1973.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor T (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang P, Iyer K, Frazier PI (2016) Mean field equilibria for competitive exploration in resource sharing settings. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 177–187.Google Scholar