Empty-Car Routing in Ridesharing Systems
Published Online:6 Aug 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1822
References
- (2007) Price-directed control of a closed logistics queueing network. Oper. Res. 55(6):1022–1038.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Closed queueing networks under congestion: Nonbottleneck independence and bottleneck convergence. Math. Oper. Res. 38(3):469–491.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Applied Probability and Queues, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
- (2016) Multi-objective pricing for shared vehicle systems. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- (2017) Pricing and optimization in shared vehicle systems: An approximation framework. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- (1975) Open, closed and mixed networks of queues with different classes of customers. J. Assoc. Comput. Machinery 22(2):248–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- (2016) Uber’s first self-driving fleet arrives in pittsburgh this month. Bloomberg (August 18), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-08-18/uber-s-first-self-driving-fleet-arrives-in-pittsburgh-this-month-is06r7on.Google Scholar
- (2013) Bike sharing systems: Solving the static rebalancing problem. Discrete Optim. 10(2):120–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) The NEOS server. IEEE Comput. Sci. Engrg. 5(3):68–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- DRI (2016) Didi Research Institute website. Accessed June 30, 2016, http://research.xiaojukeji.com/index_en.html.Google Scholar
- (2012) Stochastic modeling and decentralized control policies for large-scale vehicle sharing systems via closed queueing networks. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
- (2011) Fleet-sizing and service availability for a vehicle rental system via closed queueing networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211(1):198–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Coping with time-varying demand when setting staffing requirements for a service system. Production Oper. Management 16(1):13–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) (Citi)Bike sharing. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- (2016) A BCMP network approach to modeling and controlling autonomous mobility-on-demand systems. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- (1992) Asymptotic analysis of queueing networks. Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 40(1–2):43–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) T-share: A large-scale dynamic taxi ridesharing service. Proc. 2013 IEEE 29th Internat. Conf. Data Engrg. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, DC), 410–421.Google Scholar
- (2016) Dynamic matching for real-time ridesharing. Working paper, College of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Koç University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
- (2012) Robotic load balancing for mobility-on-demand systems. Internat. J. Robotics Res. 31(7):839–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Mean-value analysis of closed multichain queuing networks. J. ACM 27(2):313–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Taxi and ride sharing: A dynamic dial-a-ride problem with money as an incentive. Expert Systems Appl. 42(19):6728–6737.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Approximate mean value analysis for closed queuing networks with multiple-server stations. Working paper, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison.Google Scholar
- (2013) Vehicle sharing system pricing regulation: A fluid approximation. Working paper, G-SCOP, University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
- (2016) Pricing in vehicle sharing systems: Optimization in queuing networks with product forms. EURO J. Trans. Logist. 5(3):293–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Mean field equilibria for competitive exploration in resource sharing settings. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (WWW '16) (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva), 177–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Control of robotic mobility-on-demand systems. Internat. J. Robotics Res. 35(1–3):186–203.Crossref, Google Scholar

