Combining the Virtues of Stochastic Frontier and Data Envelopment Analysis

References

• Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production functions. J. Econom. 6(1):21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvarez A, Amsler C, Orea L, Schmidt P (2006) Interpreting and testing the scaling property in models where inefficiency depends on firm characteristics. J. Productivity Anal. 25(2):201–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andor M, Parmeter CF (2017) Pseudolikelihood estimation of the stochastic frontier model. Appl. Econom. 49(55):5651–5661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badunenko O, Henderson DJ, Kumbhakar SC (2012) When, where and how to perform efficiency analysis. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. A 175(4):863–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Maindiratta A (1992) Maximum likelihood estimation of monotone and concave production frontiers. J. Productivity Anal. 3(4):401–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Natarajan R (2008) Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis. Oper. Res. 56(1):48–58.Link, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Thrall RM (1992) Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 62(1):74–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. 30(9):1078–1092.Link, Google Scholar
• Bogetoft P, Otto L (2015) Benchmarking with DEA and SFA. R package version 0.26.Google Scholar
• Casu B, Ferrari A, Zhao T (2013) Regulatory reform and productivity change in indian banking. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(3):1066–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers RG, Färe R (2008) A “calculus” for data envelopment analysis. J. Productivity Anal. 30(1):169–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapple W, Lockett A, Siegel D, Wright M (2005) Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Res. Policy 34(3):369–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6):429–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L-H, Cheng M-Y, Peng L (2009) Conditional variance estimation in heteroscedastic regression models. J. Statist. Planning Inference 139(2):236–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coelli T, Henningsen A (2017) Frontier: Stochastic frontier analysis. R package version 1.1-2, https://CRAN.R-Project.org/package=frontier.Google Scholar
• Cook W, Harrison J, Imanirad R, Rouse P, Zhu J (2013) Data envelopment analysis with nonhomogeneous DMUs. Oper. Res. 61(3):666–676.Link, Google Scholar
• Cook WD, Zhu J (2008) CAR-DEA: Context-dependent assurance regions in DEA. Oper. Res. 56(1):69–78.Link, Google Scholar
• Daraio C, Simar L, Wilson PW (2018) Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’ condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production. Econom. J. 21(2):170–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19(3):273–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delgado MA, Gonzalez-Manteiga W (2001) Significance testing in nonparametric regression based on the bootstrap. Ann. Statist. 29(5):1469–1507.Google Scholar
• Delgado MS, Parmeter CF (2013) Embarrassingly easy embarrassingly parallel processing in R. J. Appl. Econom. 28(6):1224–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du P, Parmeter CF, Racine JS (2013) Nonparametric kernel regression with multiple predictors and multiple shape constraints. Statist. Sinica 23(3):1347–1371.Google Scholar
• Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132(2):245–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan J, Gijbels I (1996) Local Polynomial Modelling and Its Application (Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Fan J, Yao Q (1998) Efficient estimation of conditional variance functions in stochastic regression. Biometrika 85(3):645–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan J, Zhang C, Zhang J (2001) Generalized likelihood ratio statistics and Wilks phenomenon. Ann. Statist. 29(1):153–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Li Q, Weersink A (1996) Semiparametric estimation of stochastic production frontier models. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 14(4):460–468.Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S (1983) Measuring output efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 13(1):173–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. A General 120(3):253–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giraleas D, Emrouznejad A, Thanassoulis E (2012) Productivity change using growth accounting and frontier-based approaches—Evidence from a Monte Carlo analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222(3):673–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong B-H, Sickles RC (1992) Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis using panel data. J. Econom. 51(2):259–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu J, Li D, Liu D (2007) Bootstrap non-parametric significance test. J. Nonparametric Statist. 19(6–8):215–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo X, Li G-R, McAleer M, Wong W-K (2018) Specification testing of production in a stochastic frontier model. Sustainability 10(9):3082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hafner C, Manner H, Simar L (2016) The “wrong skewness” problem in stochastic frontier model: A new approach. Econom. Rev. 31(4):380–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall P, Huang H (2001) Nonparametric kernel regression subject to monotonicity constraints. Ann. Statist. 29(3):624–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall P, Simar L (2002) Estimating a changepoint, boundary or frontier in the presence of observation error. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97(458):523–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Härdle W, Mammen E (1993) Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits. Ann. Statist. 21(4):1926–1947.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayfield T, Racine JS (2008) Nonparametric econometrics: The np package. J. Statist. Software 27(5):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson DJ, Parmeter CF (2012) Normal reference bandwidths for the general order, multivariate kernel density derivative estimator. Statist. Probab. Lett. 82(8):2198–2205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson DJ, Parmeter CF (2015) Applied Nonparametric Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson L, Kubmhakar SC, Heshmati A (1996) DEA, DFA and SFA: A comparison. J. Productivity Anal. 7(3):303–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horrace WC, Parmeter CF (2011) Semiparametric deconvolution with unknown error variance. J. Productivity Anal. 35(2):129–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horrace WC, Wright IA (2019) Stationary points for stochastic frontier models. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. ePub ahead of print January 29, https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2018.1526088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C, Li Q, Racine JS (2007) A consistent model specification test with mixed categorical and continuous data. J. Econom. 140(2):802–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim W, Linton OB, Hengartner NW (1999) A computationally efficient oracle estimator for additive nonparametric regression with bootstrap confidence intervals. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 8(2):278–297.Google Scholar
• Kneip A, Simar L, Van Keilegom I (2015) Frontier estimation in the presence of measurement error with unknown variance. J. Econom. 184(2):379–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krüger JJ (2012) A Monte Carlo study of old and new frontier methods for efficiency measurement. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222(1):137–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar SC, Tsionas EG (2008) Scale and efficiency measurement using a semiparametric stochastic frontier model: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banks. Empirical Econom. 34(3):585–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar SC, Park BU, Simar L, Tsionas EG (2007) Nonparametric stochastic frontiers: A local maximum likelihood approach. J. Econom. 137(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen T, Kortelainen M (2012) Stochastic non-smooth envelopment of data: Semi-parametric frontier estimation subject to shape constraints. J. Productivity Anal. 38(1):11–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen T, Johnson A, Saastamoinen A (2015) Stochastic nonparametric approach to efficiency analysis: A unified framework. Zhu J, ed. Data Envelopment Analysis, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (Springer Science, New York), 191–244.Google Scholar
• Lavergne P, Vuong Q (1996) Nonparametric significance testing. Econom. Theory 16(4):576–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Q (1996) Estimating a stochastic production frontier when the adjusted error is symmetric. Econom. Lett. 52(3):221–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Q, Racine J (2007) Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Li Q, Wang S (1998) A simple consistent bootstrap test for a parametric regression function. J. Econom. 87(2):145–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Liu G, Li Q (2017) Nonparametric knn estimation with monotone constraints. Econom. Rev. 36(6–9):988–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mammen E (1992) When Does Bootstrap Work? Asymptotic Results and Simulations, Lecture Notes in Statistics, 77th ed. (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martins-Filho C (2014) Review of estimation and inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives. Foundations and trends in econometrics, volume 5, numbers 3-4 by Leopold Simar and Paul W. Wilson. J. Econom. Literature 52(1):218–220.Google Scholar
• Martins-Filho CB, Yao F (2015) Semiparametric stochastic frontier estimation via profile likelihood. Econom. Rev. 34(4):413–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meeusen W, van den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. Internat. Econom. Rev. 18(2):435–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noh H (2014) Frontier estimation using kernel smoothing estimators with data transformation. J. Korean Statist. Soc. 43(4):503–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olesen OB, Petersen NC (1995) Chance constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Sci. 41(3):442–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Olesen OB, Petersen NC (2016) Stochastic data envelopment analysis—A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 251(1):2–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson JA, Schmidt P, Waldman DA (1980) A Monte Carlo study of estimators of stochastic frontier production functions. J. Econom. 13(1):67–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park BU, Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2015) Categorical data in local maximum likelihood: Theory and applications to productivity analysis. J. Productivity Anal. 43(1):199–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmeter CF, Kumbhakar SC (2014) Efficiency analysis: A primer on recent advances. Foundations Trends Econom. 7(3–4):191–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmeter CF, Racine JS (2012) Smooth constrained frontier analysis. Chen X, Swanson N, eds. Recent Advances and Future Directions in Causality, Prediction, and Specification Analysis: Essays in Honor of Halbert L. White Jr. (Springer, New York), 463–489.Google Scholar
• Parmeter CF, Wang H-J, Kumbhakar SC (2017) Nonparametric estimation of the determinants of inefficiency. J. Productivity Anal. 47(3):205–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Racine JS (1997) Consistent significance testing for nonparametric regression. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 15(3):369–378.Google Scholar
• Racine JS, Li Q (2004) Nonparametric estimation of regression functions with both categorical and continuous data. J. Econom. 119(1):99–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritter C, Simar L (1997) Pitfalls of normal-gamma stochastic frontier models. J. Productivity Anal. 8(2):167–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruppert D, Sheather S, Wand MP (1995) An effective bandwidth selector for local least squares regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(432):1257–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt P (2011) One-step and two-step estimation in SFA models. J. Productivity Anal. 36(2):201–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seijo E, Sen B (2011) Nonparametric least squares estimation of a multivariate convex regression function. Ann. Statist. 39(3):1633–1657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L (1992) Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: A comparison of parametric, non-parametric and semi-parametric methods with bootstrapping. J. Productivity Anal. 3(2):171–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L (2007) How to improve the performances of DEA/FDH estimators in the presence of noise. J. Productivity Anal. 28(2):183–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J. Econom. 136(1):31–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Wilson PW (2009) Inferences from cross-sectional, stochastic frontier models. Econom. Rev. 29(1):62–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Wilson PW (2011) Two-stage DEA: Caveat emptor. J. Productivity Anal. 36(2):205–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Wilson PW (2013) Estimation and inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives. Foundations Trends Econom. 5(2):183–337.Google Scholar
• Simar L, Wilson PW (2015) Statistical approaches for nonparametric frontier models: A guided tour. Internat. Statist. Rev. 83(1):77–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2011) Stochastic FDH/DEA estimators for frontier analysis. J. Productivity Anal. 36(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Van Keilegom I, Zelenyuk V (2017a) Nonparametric least squares methods for stochastic frontier models. J. Productivity Anal. 47(3):189–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Van Keilegom I, Zelenyuk V, Parmeter CF (2017b) Inference for nonparametric stochastic frontier models. University of Miami Working Paper 19-01, University of Miami, Miami.Google Scholar
• Stevenson R (1980) Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation. J. Econom. 13(1):58–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R, Hastie T (1987) Local likelihood estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82(398):559–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman DM (1982) A stationary point for the stochastic frontier likelihood. J. Econom. 18(1):275–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H-J, Schmidt P (2002) One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. J. Productivity Anal. 18(2):129–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu KL, Phillips PCB (2011) Tilted nonparametric estimation of volatility functions with empirical applications. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(4):518–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu C (1998) The effects of exogenous variables in efficiency measurement—A Monte Carlo study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 105(3):569–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng X (2009) Testing heteroskedasticity in nonlinear and nonparametric regression. Can. J. Statist. 37(2):282–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu J (2004) Imprecise DEA via standard linear DEA models with a revisit to a Korean mobile telecommunication company. Oper. Res. 52(2):323–329.Link, Google Scholar