The When and How of Delegated Search

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.0498

References

  • Alizamir S, de Véricourt F, Sun P (2022) Search under accumulated pressure. Oper. Res. 70(3):1393–1409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balseiro SR, Gurkan H, Sun P (2019) Multiagent mechanism design without money. Oper. Res. 67(5):1417–1436.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barseghyan L, Molinari F, O’Donoghue T, Teitelbaum JC (2018) Estimating risk preferences in the field. J. Econom. Literature 56(2):501–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M, Lippman SA (2004) Bargaining with search as an outside option: The impact of the buyer’s future availability. Decision Anal. 1(4):235–249.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Belloni A, Chen B, Sun P (2016) Computation of optimal dynamic mechanism with participation requirements. Duke working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  • Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2005) Contract Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Chen M, Sun P, Xiao Y (2020) Optimal monitoring schedule in dynamic contracts. Oper. Res. 68(5):1285–1314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erat S, Krishnan V (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1990) Short-term contracts and long-term agency relationships. J. Econom. Theory 51(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fuloria PC, Zenios SA (2001) Outcomes-adjusted reimbursement in a health-care delivery system. Management Sci. 47(6):735–751.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerardi D, Maestri L (2012) A principal–agent model of sequential testing. Theoret. Econom. 7(3):425–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gronau R (1971) Information and frictional unemployment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 61(3):290–301.Google Scholar
  • Hart O, Holmström B (1987) The theory of contracts. Bewley TF, eds. Adv. Econom. Theory Fifth World Congress, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, New York), 71–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu Z, Tang W (2021) Size matters, so does duration: The interplay between offer size and offer deadline. Management Sci. 67(8):4935–4960.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinberg J, Kleinberg R (2018) Delegated search approximates efficient search. Proc. 2018 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM), 287–302.Google Scholar
  • Kotlikoff LJ, Gokhale J (1992) Estimating a firm’s age-productivity profile using the present value of workers’ earnings. Quart. J. Econom. 107(4):1215–1242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2009) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster T, Chesher A (1983) An econometric analysis of reservation wages. Econometrica 51(6):1661–1676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis TR (2012) A theory of delegated search for the best alternative. RAND J. Econom. 43(3):391–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Zhang H, Fine CH (2013) Dynamic business share allocation in a supply chain with competing suppliers. Oper. Res. 61(2):280–297.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, Mamer JW (2012) Exploding offers. Decision Anal. 9(1):6–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, McCall J (1976) The economics of job search: A survey. Econom. Inquiry 14(2):155–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mai Y, Pekeč S (2018) Information acquisition and technology adoption in a partnership. Duke working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  • Malcomson JM, Spinnewyn F (1988) The multiperiod principal-agent problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 55(3):391–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massala O, Tsetlin I (2015) Search before trade-offs are known. Decision Anal. 12(3):105–121.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McCall JJ (1970) Economics of information and job search. Quart. J. Econom. 84(1):113–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCardle KF (1985) Information acquisition and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. 31(11):1372–1389.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RC (1990) Continuous-Time Finance (Blackwell, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Mortensen DT (1986) Job search and labor market analysis. Ashenfelter OC, Layard R, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 849–919.Google Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Zenios SA (2000) Performance-based incentives in a dynamic principal-agent model. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(3):240–263.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Zenios SA (2003) Incentive efficient control of a make-to-stock production system. Oper. Res. 51(3):371–386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Poblete J, Spulber D (2017) Managing innovation: Optimal incentive contracts for delegated R&D with double moral hazard. Eur. Econom. Rev. 95(C):38–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Radner R (1985) Repeated principal-agent games with discounting. Econometrica 53(5):1173–1198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmani M, Ramachandran K (2021) Delegating innovation projects with deadline: Committed vs. flexible stopping. Management Sci. 67(10):6317–6332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein A, Yaari ME (1983) Repeated insurance contracts and moral hazard. J. Econom. Theory 30(1):74–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuel-Cahn E (1984) Comparison of threshold stop rules and maximum for independent nonnegative random variables. Ann. Probab. 12(4):1213–1216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith JE (1998) Evaluating income streams: A decision analysis approach. Management Sci. 44(12 part 1):1690–1708.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spear SE, Srivastava S (1987) On repeated moral hazard with discounting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(4):599–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun P, Tian F (2018) Optimal contract to induce continued effort. Management Sci. 64(9):4193–4217.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tang W, Bearden JN, Tsetlin I (2009) Ultimatum deadlines. Management Sci. 55(8):1423–1437.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ulbricht R (2016) Optimal delegated search with adverse selection and moral hazard. Theoret. Econom. 11(1):253–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulu C, Smith JE (2009) Uncertainty, information acquisition, and technology adoption. Oper. Res. 57(3):740–752.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Berg GJ (1990) Nonstationarity in job search theory. Rev. Econom. Stud. 57(2):255–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang H (2012a) Analysis of a dynamic adverse selection model with asymptotic efficiency. Math. Oper. Res. 37(3):450–474.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang H (2012b) Solving an infinite horizon adverse selection model through finite policy graphs. Oper. Res. 60(4):850–864.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang H, Zenios SA (2008) A dynamic principal-agent model with hidden information: Sequential optimality through truthful state revelation. Oper. Res. 56(3):681–696.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zorc S, Tsetlin I (2020) Deadlines, offer timing, and the search for alternatives. Oper. Res. 68(3):927–948.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.