Failing to Foresee the Updating of the Reference Point Leads to Time-Inconsistent Investment

References

• Acland D, Levy MR (2015) Naiveté, projection bias, and habit formation in gym attendance. Management Sci. 61(1):146–160.Link, Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Hirshleifer D, Jiang D, Lim S (2008) Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 105(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Hirshleifer D, Jiang D, Lim S (2010) A cross-cultural study of reference point adaptation: Evidence from China, Korea and the US. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 112(2):99–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2009) What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. J. Finance 64(2):751–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2012) Realization utility. J. Financial Econom. 104(2):251–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkan R, Busemeyer JR (1999) Changing plans: Dynamic inconsistency and the effect of experience on the reference point. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 6(4):547–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkan R, Busemeyer JR (2003) Modeling dynamic inconsistency with a changing reference point. J. Behav. Decision Making 16(4):235–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Sarin RK (2008) Does more money buy you more happiness? Kugler T, Connolly T, Smith JC, Son YJ, eds. Decision Modeling and Behavior in Complex and Uncertain Environments (Springer, New York), 199–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Sarin RK (2010) Predicting utility under satiation and habit formation. Management Sci. 56(2):286–301.Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Sarin RK (2013) Determinants of experienced utility: Laws and implications. Decision Anal. 10(2):135–151.Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Weber M, Welfens F (2011) Reference-point formation and updating. Management Sci. 57(3):506–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkelaar AB, Kouwenberg R, Post T (2004) Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(4):973–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard C, Ghossoub M (2010) Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory. Math. Financial Econom. 2(4):277–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilias Y, Georgarakos D, Haliassos M (2010) Portfolio inertia and stock market fluctuations. J. Money Credit Banking 42(4):715–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen HA, Rao AR (2002) Close encounters of two kinds: False alarms and dashed hopes. Marketing Sci. 21(2):178–196.Link, Google Scholar
• Easterlin RA (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. David PA, Reder MW, eds. Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz (Academic Press, New York), 89–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Updating the reference level: Experimental evidence. Zwick R, Rapoport A, eds. Experimental Business Research, vol. 3 (Springer, Berlin), 263–284.Google Scholar
• Hammond PJ (1976) Changing tastes and coherent dynamic choice. Rev. Econom. Stud. 43(1):159–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He X, Yang L (2019) Realization utility with adaptive reference points. Math. Finance 29(2):409–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He XD, Zhou XY (2011a) Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: An analytical treatment. Management Sci. 57(2):315–331.Link, Google Scholar
• He XD, Zhou XY (2011b) Portfolio choice via quantiles. Math. Finance 21(2):203–231.Google Scholar
• He XD, Zhou XY (2014) Myopic loss aversion, reference point, and money illusion. Quant. Finance 14(9):1541–1554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hens T, Vlcek M (2011) Does prospect theory explain the disposition effect? J. Behav. Finance 12(3):141–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ, Loewenstein GF (1991) Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. J. Consumer Res. 17(4):492–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imas A (2016) The realization effect: Risk-taking after realized vs. paper losses. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(8):2086–2109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingersoll JE, Jin LJ (2013) Realization utility with reference-dependent preferences. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(3):723–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin H, Zhou XY (2008) Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time. Math. Finance 18(3):385–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kliger D, Levy O (2008) Projection bias by investors: A market approach. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 66(3–4):657–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Ng WL (2000) Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: Multiperiod mean-variance formulation. Math. Finance 10(3):387–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Schkade D (1999) Wouldnt it be nice? Predicting future feelings. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N, eds. Well-Being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 85–108.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (2003) Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1209–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lou Y, Strub MS, Li D, Wang S (2017) Reference point formation in social networks, wealth growth, and inequality. Working paper, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.Google Scholar
• Meng J, Weng X (2018) Can prospect theory explain the disposition effect? A new perspective on reference points. Management Sci. 64(7):2973–3468.Link, Google Scholar
• Pedersen JL, Peskir G (2017) Optimal mean-variance portfolio selection. Math. Financial Econom. 11(2):137–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Cui X, Li D (2015a) Discrete-time behavioral portfolio selection under cumulative prospect theory. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 61:283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Cui X, Yao J, Li D (2015b) Dynamic trading with reference point adaption and loss aversion. Oper. Res. 63(4):789–806.Link, Google Scholar
• Strotz RH (1956) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23(3):165–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prioroutcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou XY, Li D (2000) Continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection: A stochastic LQ framework. Appl. Math. Optim. 42(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar