Majority Judgment vs. Approval Voting

References

• Balinski M, Laraki R (2007) A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(21):8720–8725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balinski M, Laraki R (2011a) Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balinski M, Laraki R (2011b) Election by majority judgment: Experimental evidence. Dolez B, Grofman B, Laurent A, eds. In Situ and Laboratory Experiments on Electoral Law Reform: French Presidential Elections (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany), 13–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balinski M, Laraki R (2014a) What should ‘majority decision’ mean. Elster J, Novak S, eds. Majority Decisions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 103–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balinski M, Laraki R (2014b) Judge: Don’t vote! Oper. Res. 62:483–511.Link, Google Scholar
• Balinski M, Laraki R (2019) Majority judgment vs. majority rule. Soc. Choice Welfare, ePub ahead of print July 2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-019-01200-x.Google Scholar
• Barberà S, Moreno B (2011) Top monotonicity: A common root for single peakedness, single crossing and the median voter result. Games Econom. Behav. 73:345–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bogomolny A (2011) MAA Review of Majority Judgement: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing. Accessed February 1, 2016, https://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/majority-judgement-measuring-ranking-and-electing.Google Scholar
• Borda J-CC (1784) Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences. Accessed July 3, 2019, http://asklepios.chez.com/XIX/borda.htm.Google Scholar
• Brams SJ (1980) Approval voting in multicandidate elections. Policy Stud. J. 9:102–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brams SJ (2010) Preface. Laslier J-F, Sanver MR, eds. Handbook on Approval Voting (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), vii-ix.Google Scholar
• Brams SJ (2011) Grading candidates. Amer. Sci. 99:426–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brames SJ, Fishburn PC (2001) A nail-biting election. Soc. Choice Welfare 18:409–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (1983) Approval Voting (Birkhauser, Boston).Google Scholar
• Condorcet M (1785) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix (L’Imprimerie Royale, Paris).Google Scholar
• Edelman PE (2012) Book review of Majority Judgement: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing. Public Choice 151:807–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etter E, Herzen J, Grossglauser M, Thiran P (2014) Mining democracy. Accessed September 15, 2016, http://cosn.acm.org/2014/files/cosn060f-etterA.pdf.Google Scholar
• Feld SL, Grofman B (1986) Partial single-peakedness: An extension and clarification. Public Choice 51:71–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felsenthal DS, Machover M (2008) The majority judgment voting procedure: A critical evaluation. Homo œconomicus 25:319–334.Google Scholar
• FINA (2017) FINA diving rules, 12–23. Accessed July 2, 2019, https://www.fina.org.Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Suitt J, Guyon A, Hennion T, Laraki R, Starkloff X, Thibault S, Favreau B (2014) Vers un système de vote plus juste? Working Paper No. 2014-20, ‘Ecole Polytechnique, Palaseau Cedex, France.Google Scholar
• Lackner M-L, Lackner M (2017) On the likelihood of single-peaked preferences. Soc. Choice Welfare 48:717–745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaPrimaire.org (2016) Accessed July 2, 2019, https://laprimaire.org.Google Scholar
• Laslier J-F, Remzi Sanver M, eds. (2010) Handbook on Approval Voting (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhavan G, Phelps C, Rappuoli R (2017) Compare voting systems to improve them. Nature 541:151–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mieux Voter (2018) Accessed July 2, 2019, www.mieuxvoter.fr.Google Scholar
• Niemi RG (1969) Majority decison-making with partial unidimensionality. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 63:488–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paine T (1776) Common Sense. Project Gutenberg. Accessed July 2, 2019, http://www.gutenberg.org/files/147/147-h/147-h.htm.Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2016a) March 2016 political survey. Accessed May 5, 2016, http://www.people-press.org/files/2016/03/03-31-2016-Political-topline-for-release.pdf.Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2016b) As election nears, voters divided over democracy and ‘respect’. Accessed July 10, 2017, http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/11/03170033/10-27-16-October-political-release.pdf.Google Scholar
• Pons V, Tricaud C (2018) Expressive voting and its costs: Evidence from runoffs with two or three candidates. Econometrica 86(5):1621–1649.Google Scholar
• Puppe C, Slinko A (2017) Condorcet domains, median graphs and the single crossing property. Econom. Theory 67(1):285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossiter C, Lare J, eds. (1963) The Phantom Public (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Saari DG (2001a) Analyzing a nail-biting election. Soc. Choice Welfare 18:415–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saari DG (2001b) Decisions and Elections: Explaining the Unexpected (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saari DG, van Newenhizen J (1988) Is approval voting an ‘unmitigated evil’? Public Choice 59:133–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber RJ (1977) Comparison of public choice systems. Cowles Foundation discussion paper 498, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar