Optimal Signaling of Content Accuracy: Engagement vs. Misinformation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1897

References

  • Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, ParandehGheibi A (2010) Spread of (mis)information in social networks. Games Econom. Behav. 70(2):194–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alaei S, Malekian A, Mostagir M (2016) A dynamic model of crowdfunding. Proc. 2016 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. EC ’16 (ACM, New York), 363.Google Scholar
  • Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econom. Perspect. 31(2):211–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allon G, Bassamboo A, Gurvich I (2011) “We will be right with you”: Managing customer expectations with vague promises and cheap talk. Oper. Res. 59(6):1382–1394.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alonso R, Camara O (2016) Persuading voters. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(11):3590–3605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arieli I, Babichenko Y (2016) Private Bayesian persuasion. Working paper, Technion–Israeli Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
  • Ballester C, Calvó-Armengol A, Zenou Y (2006) Who’s who in networks. Wanted: The key player. Econometrica 74(5):1403–1417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Accessed August 15, 2019, http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154.Google Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Morris S (2016a) Bayes correlated equilibrium and the comparison of information structures in games. Theoret. Econom. 11(2):487–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Morris S (2016b) Information design, Bayesian persuasion, and Bayes correlated equilibrium. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):586–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Morris S (2018) Information design: A unified perspective. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Brooks B, Morris S (2015) The limits of price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(3):921–957.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2015) Designing dynamic contests. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. EC ’15 (ACM, New York), 281–282.Google Scholar
  • Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A, Yildiz E (2016) Competitive targeted advertising over networks. Oper. Res. 64(3):705–720.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brocas I, Carrillo JD (2007) Influence through ignorance. RAND J. Econom. 38(4):931–947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Budak C, Agrawal D, El Abbadi A (2011) Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web. WWW ’11 (ACM, New York), 665–674.Google Scholar
  • Candogan O (2019) Persuasion in networks: Public signals and k-cores. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago. Accessed August 15, 2019, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3346144.Google Scholar
  • Candogan O, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2012) Optimal pricing in networks with externalities. Oper. Res. 60(4):883–905.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gentzkow M, Kamenica E (2017) Bayesian persuasion with multiple senders and rich signal spaces. Games Econom. Behav. 104(Supplement C):411–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gottfried J, Shearer E (2016) News use across social media platforms 2016. Pew Research Center (May 26), https://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/.Google Scholar
  • Guo P, Zipkin P (2007) Analysis and comparison of queues with different levels of delay information. Management Sci. 53(6):962–970.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R (1986) Consumer information in markets with random product quality: The case of queues and balking. Econometrica 54(5):1185–1195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jouini O, Akşin Z, DalleryY (2011) Call centers with delay information: Models and insights. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(4):534–548.Google Scholar
  • Kamenica E, Gentzkow M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2590–2615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
  • Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. 9th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 137–146.Google Scholar
  • Kumar S, West R, Leskovec J (2016) Disinformation on the web: Impact, characteristics, and detection of Wikipedia hoaxes. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web. WWW ’16 (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Geneva), 591–602.Google Scholar
  • Leskovec J, Krevl A (2014) SNAP Datasets: Stanford large network data set collection. Accessed August 15, 2019, http://snap.stanford.edu/data.Google Scholar
  • Lingenbrink D, Iyer K (2017) Optimal signaling mechanisms in unobservable queues with strategic customers. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. EC ’17 (ACM, New York), 347.Google Scholar
  • Mosseri A (2016) Addressing hoaxes and fake news. Facebook Newsroom (December 15), https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/12/news-feed-fyi-addressing-hoaxes-and-fake-news/Google Scholar
  • Nguyen NP, Yan G, Thai MT, Eidenbenz S (2012) Containment of misinformation spread in online social networks. Proc. 4th Annual ACM Web Sci. Conf. WebSci ’12 (ACM, New York), 213–222.Google Scholar
  • Papanastasiou Y (2020) Fake news propagation and detection: A sequential model. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print January 23, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3295.Google Scholar
  • Papanastasiou Y, Bimpikis K, Savva N (2018) Crowdsourcing exploration. Management Sci. 64(4):1727–1746.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rayo L, Segal I (2010) Optimal information disclosure. J. Political Econom. 118(5):949–987.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tambuscio M, Ruffo G, Flammini A, Menczer F (2015) Fact-checking effect on viral hoaxes: A model of misinformation spread in social networks. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 977–982.Google Scholar
  • Taneva IA (2019) Information design. Amer. Econom. J: Microeconom. 11(4):151–185.Google Scholar
  • Zhou J, Chen Y-J (2016) Targeted information release in social networks. Oper. Res. 64(3):721–735.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.