Modeling and Design of Container Terminal Operations

References

• Asmussen S (2008) Applied Probability and Queues (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Bae H, Choe R, Park T, Ryu K (2011) Comparison of operations of AGVs and ALVs in an automated container terminal. J. Intelligent Manufacturing 22(3):413–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baskett F, Chandy KM, Muntz RR, Palacios FG (2005) Open, closed and mixed networks of queues with different classes of customers. J. ACM 22(2):248–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brinkmann B (2010) Operations systems of container terminals: A compendious overview. Böse JW, ed. Handbook of Terminal Planning, vol. 49 (Springer, Berlin), 25–39.Google Scholar
• Canonaco P, Legato P, Mazza RM, Musmanno R (2008) A queuing network model for the management of berth crane operations. Comput. Oper. Res. 35(8):2432–2446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy KM, Herzog U, Woo L (1975) Parametric analysis of queuing network models. IBM J Res. 19(1):43–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Mandelbaum A (1991) Stochastic discrete flow networks: Diffusion approximations and bottlenecks. Ann. Probab. 19(4):1463–1519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dallery Y (1990) Approximate analysis of general open queuing networks with restricted capacity. Performance Evaluation 11(3):209–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Koster MBM, Le-Anh T, van der Meer JR (2004) Testing and classifying vehicle dispatching rules in three real-world settings. J. Oper. Management 22(4):369–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dragovic B, Park NK, Radmilovic Z (2006) Ship-berth link performance evaluation: Simulation and analytical approaches. Maritime Policy Management 33(3):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duinkerken M, Dekker R, Kurstjens S, Ottjes J, Dellaert N (2007) Comparing transportation systems for inter-terminal transport at the Maasvlakte container terminals. Kim KH, Günther H, eds. Container Terminals and Cargo Systems (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg) 37–61.Google Scholar
• Easa SM (1987) Approximate queueing models for analyzing harbor terminal operations. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 21(4):269–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmond ED, Maggs RP (1978) How useful are queue models in port investment decisions for container berths? J. Oper. Res. Soc. 29(8):741–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gharehgozli AH, Roy D, de Koster R (2016) Sea container terminals: New technologies and OR models. Maritime Econom. Logist. 18(2):103–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gharehgozli AH, Laporte G, Yu Y, de Koster R (2014) Scheduling twin yard cranes in a container block. Transportation Sci. 49(3):686–705.Google Scholar
• Global Industry Analysts (2013) Global maritime containerization market to reach 731 TEUs by 2017, according to new report by Global Industry Analysts, Inc. PRWeb (April 9), http://www.prweb.com/releases/containerization/container_shipping/prweb9382752.htm.Google Scholar
• Guan C, Liu R (2009) Container terminal gate appointment system optimization. Maritime Econom. Logist. 11(4):378–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Günther HO, Kim KH (2006) Container terminals and terminal operations. OR Spectrum 28(4):437–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoshino S, Ota J, Shinozaki A, Hashimoto H (2004) Optimal design methodology for an AGV transportation system by using the queuing network theory. Alami R, Chatila R, Asama H, eds. Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, vol. 6 (Springer, Tokyo) 411–420.Google Scholar
• Jia J, Heragu SS (2009) Solving semi-open queuing networks. Oper. Res. 57(2):391–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim KH, Kim KY (1999) An optimal routing algorithm for a transfer crane in port container terminals. Transportation Sci. 33(1):17–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim KH, Park Y (2004) A crane scheduling method for port container terminals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(3):752–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kingman JFC (1962) On queues in heavy traffic. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 24(2):383–392.Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg E, Lam RC (1976) Cyclic queue models of fleet operations. Oper. Res. 24(3):516–529.Link, Google Scholar
• Köllerström J (1974) Heavy traffic theory for queues with several servers. I. J. Appl. Probab. 11(3):544–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazowska ED, Zahorjan J, Graham GS, Sevcik KC (1984) Quantitative System Performance: Computer System Analysis Using Queueing Network Models (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Li W, Wu Y, Petering MEH, Goh M, de Souza R (2009) Discrete time model and algorithms for container yard crane scheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 198(1):165–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang C, Huang Y, Yang Y (2009) A quay crane dynamic scheduling problem by hybrid evolutionary algorithm for berth allocation planning. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 56(3):1021–1028.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meisel F, Bierwirth C (2013) A framework for integrated berth allocation and crane operations planning in seaport container terminals. Transportation Sci. 47(2):131–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Mennis E, Platis A, Lagoudis I, Nikitakos N (2008) Improving port container terminal efficiency with the use of Markov theory. Maritime Econom. Logist. 10(3):243–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meller RD, Mungwattana A (2005) AS/RS dwell-point strategy selection at high system utilization: A simulation study to investigate the magnitude of the benefit. Internat. J. Production Res. 43(24):5217–5227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng WC (2005) Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164(1):64–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petering MEH (2010) Development and simulation analysis of real-time, dual-load yard truck control systems for seaport container transshipment terminals. OR Spectrum 32(3):633–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petering MEH (2011) Decision support for yard capacity, fleet composition, truck substitutability, and scalability issues at seaport container terminals. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 47(1):85–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petering MEH, Murty KG (2009) Effect of block length and yard crane deployment systems on overall performance at a seaport container transshipment terminal. Comput. Oper. Res. 36(5):1711–1725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petering MEH, Wu Y, Li W, Goh M, de Souza R (2009) Development and simulation analysis of real-time yard crane control systems for seaport container transshipment terminals. OR Spectrum 31(4):801–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reiman MI (1990) Asymptotically exact decomposition approximations for open queueing networks. Oper. Res. Lett. 9(6):363–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy D, de Koster MBM (2018) Stochastic modeling of unloading and loading operations at a container terminal using automated lifting vehicles. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 266(3):895–910.Google Scholar
• Saanen YA, Dekker R (2011) Intelligent stacking as way out of congested yards? Part 1. Port Tech. Internat. 31(April):87–92.Google Scholar
• Son YJ, Wysk RA, Voß S, Jones AT (2003) Simulation-based shop floor control: Formal model, model generation, and control interface. IIE Trans. 35(1):29–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operations research—A classification and literature review. OR Spectrum 26(1):3–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thijs R, Saanen Y (2016) How can simulations help ports and terminals? Harbours Rev. 2:10–12.Google Scholar
• Suresh S, Whitt W (1990) The heavy-traffic bottleneck phenomenon in open queueing networks. Oper. Res. Lett. 9(6):355–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vacca I, Salani M, Bierlaire M (2013) An exact algorithm for the integrated planning of berth allocation and quay crane assignment. Transportation Sci. 47(2):148–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Vis IFA, Carlo HJ (2010) Sequencing two cooperating automated stacking cranes in a container terminal. Transportation Sci. 44(2):169–182.Link, Google Scholar
• Vis IFA, de Koster R (2003) Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vis IFA, Harika I (2004) Comparison of vehicle types at an automated container terminal. OR Spectrum 26(1):117–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vis IFA, Roodbergen KJ (2009) Scheduling of container storage and retrieval. Oper. Res. 57(2):456–467.Link, Google Scholar
• Whitt W (1983) The queueing network analyzer. Bell Systems Tech. J. 62(9):2779–2815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitt W (1993) Approximations for the GI/G/m queue. Production Oper. Management 2(2):114–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiegmans BW, Ubbels B, Rietveld P, Nijkamp P (2002) Investments in container terminals: Public private partnerships in Europe. Internat. J. Maritime Econom. 4(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar