Estimating Uncertainties Using Judgmental Forecasts with Expert Heterogeneity

References

• Agnew JR (2006) Do behavioral biases vary across individuals? Evidence from individual level 401(k) data. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 41(4):939–962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Nagarajan M (2017) Product portfolio management with production flexibility in agribusiness. Oper. Res. 65(4):914–930.Link, Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Gutierrez GJ, Keiser JR (2016) Quantifying uncertainties and risks using managerial judgments in a dynamic new product development environment. Production Oper. Management 25(12):2010–2013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Gutierrez GJ, Keiser JR (2017) Using experts noisy quantile judgments to quantify risks: Theory and application to agribusiness. Oper. Res. 65(5):1115–1130.Link, Google Scholar
• Barron OE, Stuerke PS (1998) Dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts as a measure of uncertainty. J. Accounting Auditing Finances 13(3):245–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron OE, Kim O, Lim SC, Stevens DE (1998) Using analysts’ forecasts to measure properties of analysts’ information environment. Accounting Rev. 73(4):421–433.Google Scholar
• Bates JM, Granger CW (1969) The combination of forecasts. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 20(4):451–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batur D, Choobineh F (2010) A quantile-based approach to system selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202(3):764–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH, Moore DA (2008) Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Bjørndal T, Herrero I, Newman A, Romero C, Weintraub A (2012) Operations research in the natural resource industry. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. 19(1–2):39–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Chen E (2014) Identifying expertise to extract the wisdom of crowds. Management Sci. 61(2):267–280.Link, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Erev I, Wallsten TS (1997) On the importance of random error in the study of probability judgment. part I: New theoretical developments. J. Behav. Decision Making 10(3):157–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chopra VK, Ziemba WT (1993) The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. J. Portfolio Management 19(2):6--11.Google Scholar
• Cooke RM (1991) Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Davis-Stober CP, Budescu DV, Broomell SB, Dana J (2015) The composition of optimally wise crowds. Decision Anal. 12(3):130–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaba A, Popescu DG, Chen Z (2018) Assessing uncertainty from point forecasts. Management Sci. 65(1):90–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaur V, Kesavan S, Raman A, Fisher ML (2007) Estimating demand uncertainty using judgmental forecasts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):480–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Geweke J, Amisano G (2011) Optimal prediction pools. J. Econometrics 164(1):130–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis (Pearson Education, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Hess SW (1993) Swinging on the branch of a tree: project selection applications. Interfaces 23(6):5–12.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaafari A (2001) Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift. Internat. J. Project Management 19(2):89–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson D (1998) The robustness of mean and variance approximations in risk analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49(3):253–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson TC (2004) Forecast dispersion and the cross section of expected returns. J. Finance 59(5):1957–1978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keefer D, Bodily S (1983) Three-point approximations for continuous random variables. Management Sci. 29(5):595–609.Link, Google Scholar
• Keefer DL, Verdini WA (1993) Better estimation of pert activity time parameters. Management Sci. 39(9):1086–1091.Link, Google Scholar
• Kettunen J, Salo A (2017) Estimation of downside risks in project portfolio selection. Production Oper. Management 26(10):1839–1853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lloyd E (1952) Least-squares estimation of location and scale parameters using order statistics. Biometrika 39(1/2):88–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Kavadias S (2002) Dynamic portfolio selection of npd programs using marginal returns. Management Sci. 48(10):1227–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Merrick JR, van Dorp JR, Singh A (2005) Analysis of correlated expert judgments from extended pairwise comparisons. Decision Anal. 2(1):17–29.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravinder H, Kleinmuntz D, Dyer J (1988) The reliability of subjective probabilities obtained through decomposition. Management Sci. 34(2):186–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith JE, Winkler RL (2006) The optimizers curse: Skepticism and postdecision surprise in decision analysis. Management Sci. 52(3):311–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.Link, Google Scholar
• Stuart A, Ord JK (1994) Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Distribution Theory, vol. 1 (Arnold, London).Google Scholar
• Wallsten TS, Budescu DV (1983) State of the art? encoding subjective probabilities: A psychological and psychometric review. Management Sci. 29(2):151–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Weintraub A, Romero C (2006) Operations research models and the management of agricultural and forestry resources: a review and comparison. Interfaces 36(5):446–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL (1981) Combining probability distributions from dependent information sources. Management Sci. 27(4):479–488.Link, Google Scholar