Technical Note—Waterfall and Agile Product Development Approaches: Disjunctive Stochastic Programming Formulations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1977

References

  • Blank S (2013) Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(5):64–68.Google Scholar
  • Bodily SE (2016) Reducing risk and improving incentives in funding entrepreneurs. Decision Anal. 13(2):101–116.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper RG, Sommer AF (2018) Agile-stage-gate for manufacturers. Res. Tech. Management 61(2):17–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper RG, Edgett SJ, Kleinschmidt EJ (2000) New problems, new solutions: Making portfolio management more effective. Res. Tech. Management 43(2):18–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernandez DJ, Fernandez JD (2008) Agile project management: Agilism vs. traditional approaches. J. Comput. Inform. Systems 49(2):10–17.Google Scholar
  • Hall, NG (2016) Research and teaching opportunities in project management. Gupta A, Capponi A, eds. Optimization Challenges in Complex, Networked and Risky Systems, TutORials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 329–388.Google Scholar
  • Hall NG, Long DZ, Qi J, Sim M (2015) Managing underperformance risk in project portfolio selection. Oper. Res. 63(3):660–675.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hass KB (2007) The blending of traditional and agile project management. PM World Today 9(5):1–8.Google Scholar
  • Hassanzadeh F, Nemati H, Sun M (2014) Robust optimization for interactive multiobjective programming with imprecise information applied to R&D project portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 238(1):41–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogan A, Lejeune MA (2014) Threshold Boolean form for joint probabilistic constraints with random technology matrix. Math. Programming 147(1):391–427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lejeune MA, Margot F (2016) Solving chance constrained problems with random technology matrix and stochastic quadratic inequalities. Oper. Res. 64(4):939–957.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lejeune MA, Prékopa A (2018) Relaxations for probabilistically constrained stochastic programming problems: Review and extensions. Ann. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print June 18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2934-8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nager A, Hart D, Ezell S, Atkinson RD (2016) The demographics of innovation in the United States. Report, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Washington, DC. https://itif.org/publications/2016/02/24/demographics-innovation-united-states.Google Scholar
  • Prékopa A (2003) Probabilistic programming models. Ruszczyński A, Shapiro A, eds. Stochastic Programming, Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 10 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 267–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Project Management Institute (2017) Agile Practice Guide (Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA).Google Scholar
  • Sommerville I (2016) Software Engineering (Pearson, Harlow, UK).Google Scholar
  • Yoo OS, Huang T, Arifoglu K (2017) A theoretical analysis of the lean start-up’s agile product development process. Working paper, University College London, London.Google Scholar
  • Zhang M, Kücükyavuz S, Goel S (2014) A branch-and-cut method for dynamic decision making under joint chance constraints. Management Sci. 60(5):1317–1333.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.