Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Monte Carlo Simulation: Toward Data-Driven Stochastic Modeling

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1978

References

  • Basawa IV, Bhat UN, Lund R (1996) Maximum likelihood estimation for single server queues from waiting time data. Queueing Systems 24(1–4):155–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basawa IV, Bhat UN, Zhou J (2008) Parameter estimation using partial information with applications to queueing and related models. Statist. Probab. Lett. 78(12):1375–1383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Gupta V, Paschalidis IC (2012) Inverse optimization: A new perspective on the Black-Litterman model. Oper. Res. 60(6):1389–1403.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Birge JR, Hortaçsu A, Pavlin JM (2017) Inverse optimization for the recovery of market structure from market outcomes: An application to the miso electricity market. Oper. Res. 65(4):837–855.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cappé O, Moulines E, Rydén T (2005) Inference in Hidden Markov Models (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Del Moral P (2004) Feynman-Kac Formulae (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B. 39(1):1–38.Google Scholar
  • Doucet A (2001) Sequential Monte Carlo Methods (Wiley Online Library, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dymarski P, ed., (2011) Hidden Markov Models, Theory and Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esfahani PM, Shafieezadeh-Abadeh S, Grani A Hanasusanto DK (2018) Data-driven inverse optimization with imperfect information. Math. Programming 167(1):191–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fearnhead P (2004) Filtering recursions for calculating likelihoods for queues based on inter-departure time data. Statist. Comput. 14(3):261–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu MC (2006) Gradient estimation. Henderson SG, Nelson BL, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 13 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 575–616.Google Scholar
  • Fu MC (2015) Stochastic gradient estimation. Michael C, ed. Handbooks of Simulation Optimization (Springer, New York), 105–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu MC, Hong LJ, Hu J-Q (2009) Conditional Monte Carlo estimation of quantile sensitivities. Management Sci. 55(12):2019–2027.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glasserman P (1991) Gradient Estimation via Perturbation Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Glynn PW, Peng Y, Fu MC, Hu JQ (2020a) Computing sensitivity of distorted risk measure. INFORMS J. Comput. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Glynn PW, Fan L, Fu MC, Hu J-Q, Peng Y (2020b) Technical note—Central limit theorems for estimated functions at estimated points. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print May 21, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1922.Google Scholar
  • Goeva A, Lam H, Qian H, Zhang B (2019) Optimization-based calibration of simulation input models. Oper. Res. 67(5):1362–1382.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heidergott B, Volk-Makarewicz W (2016) A measure-valued differentiation approach to sensitivity analysis of quantiles. Math. Oper. Res. 41(1):293–317.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hong LJ (2009) Estimating quantile sensitivities. Oper. Res. 57(1):118–130.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hong LJ, Liu G (2009) Simulating sensitivities of conditional value at risk. Management Sci. 55(2):281–293.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hong LJ, Liu G (2010) Pathwise estimation of probability sensitivities through terminating or steady-state simulations. Oper. Res. 58(2):357–370.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang G, Fu MC (2015) Technical note—On estimating quantile sensitivities via infinitesimal perturbation analysis. Oper. Res. 63(2):435–441.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2001) Bayesian calibration of computer models. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B. Statist. Methodology 63(3):425–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kushner HJ, Yin GG (2003) Stochastic Approximation and Recursive Algorithms and Applications (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Larson RC (1990) The queue inference engine: Deducing queue statistics from transactional data. Management Sci. 36(5):586–601.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lei L, Peng Y, Fu MC, Hu J-Q (2018) Applications of generalized likelihood ratio method to distribution sensitivities and steady-state simulation. J. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 28(1):109–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu G, Hong LJ (2009) Kernel estimation of quantile sensitivities. Naval Res. Logist. 56(6):511–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu JS, Chen R (1998) Sequential Monte Carlo methods for dynamic systems. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 93(443):1032–1044.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng Y, Fu MC, Hu J-Q (2014) Gradient-based simulated maximum likelihood estimation for Lévy-driven Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic volatility models. Quant. Finance 14(8):1399–1414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng Y, Fu MC, Hu J-Q (2016) Gradient-based simulated maximum likelihood estimation for stochastic volatility models using characteristic functions. Quant. Finance 16(9):1393–1411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng Y, Fu MC, Glynn PW, Hu J-Q (2017) On the asymptotic analysis of quantile sensitivity estimation by Monte Carlo simulation. Chan WKV, D’Ambrogio A, Zacharewicz G, Mustafee N, Wainer G, Page E, eds. Proc. 2017 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2336–2347.Google Scholar
  • Peng Y, Fu MC, Hu J-Q, Heidergott B (2018) A new unbiased stochastic derivative estimator for discontinuous sample performances with structural parameters. Oper. Res. 66(2):487–499.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pickands J III, Stine RA (1997) Estimation for an M/G/∞ queue with incomplete information. Biometrika 84(2):295–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rhee C-H, Glynn PW (2015) Unbiased estimation with square root convergence for sde models. Oper. Res. 63(5):1026–1043.Google Scholar
  • Ross, JV, Taimre T, Pollett PK (2007) Estimation for queues from queue length data. Queueing Systems 55(2):131–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Royden HL (1988) Real Analysis, 3rd ed. (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rudin W (1964) Principles of Mathematical Analysis (McGraw-Hill Education, New York).Google Scholar
  • Shao J (2003) Mathematical Statistics (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suri R, Zazanis MA (1988) Perturbation analysis gives strongly consistent sensitivity estimates for the M/G/1 queue. Management Sci. 34(1):39–64.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tarantola A (2005) Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Vaart AW (2000) Asymptotic Statistics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Wang T-Y, Ke J-C, Wang K-H, Ho S-C (2006) Maximum likelihood estimates and confidence intervals of an M/M/R queue with heterogeneous servers. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 63(2):371–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitt W (1982) Approximating a point process by a renewal process, I: Two basic methods. Oper. Res. 30(1):125–147.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.