Scores for Multivariate Distributions and Level Sets

References

• Aastveit KA, Mitchell J, Ravazzolo F, Van Dijk HK (2019) The evolution of forecast density combinations in economics. Oxford Res. Encyclopedia Econom. Finance 4:1–39.Google Scholar
• Abbas AE, Budescu DV, Gu Y (2010) Assessing joint distributions with isoprobability contours. Management Sci. 56(6):997–1011.Link, Google Scholar
• Abernethy JD, Frongillo RM (2012) A characterization of scoring rules for linear properties. Mannor S, Srebro N, Williamson RC eds. Proc. 25th Annual Conf. Learn. Theory. PMLR, vol. 23 (PMLR.org), 27.Google Scholar
• Anthonisz SA (2012) Asset pricing with partial-moments. J. Bank. Finance 36(7):2122–2135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baringhaus L, Franz C (2004) On a new multivariate two-sample test. J. Multivariate Anal. 88(1):190–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berrocal VJ, Gelfand AE, Holland DM (2010) A spatio-temporal downscaler for output from numerical models. J. Agricultural Biological Environ. Statist. 15(2):176–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briec W, Kerstens K (2010) Portfolio selection in multidimensional general and partial moment space. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 34(4):636–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cadre B (2006) Kernel estimation of density level sets. J. Multivariate Anal. 97(4):999–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caflisch RE (1998) Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Acta Numerica 7:1–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen YC, Genovese CR, Wasserman L (2017) Density level sets: Asymptotics, inference, and visualization. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 112(520):1684–1696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbella S, Stretch D (2012) Multivariate return periods of sea storms for coastal erosion risk assessment. Natural Hazards Earth System Sci. 12(8):2699–2708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cousin A, Di Bernardino E (2013) On multivariate extensions of value-at-risk. J. Multivariate Anal. 119:32–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Smith MS (2011) Modeling multivariate distributions using copulas: Applications in marketing. Marketing Sci. 30(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Diks C, Fang H (2020) Comparing density forecasts in a risk management context. Internat. J. Forecasting 36(2):531–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diks C, Panchenko V, Sokolinskiy O, Van Dijk D (2014) Comparing the accuracy of multivariate density forecasts in selected regions of the copula support. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 48:79–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis T, Hoga Y (2022) Dynamic co-quantile regression. Preprint, submitted June 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14275v1.Google Scholar
• Ehm W, Gneiting T (2012) Local proper scoring rules of order two. Ann. Statist. 40(1):609–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehm W, Gneiting T, Jordan A, Krüger F (2016) Of quantiles and expectiles: Consistent scoring functions, Choquet representations and forecast rankings. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Series B. Statist. Methodology 78(3):505–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Puccetti G (2006) Bounds for functions of multivariate risks. J. Multivariate Anal. 97(2):526–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fissler T, Frongillo R, Hlavinová J, Rudloff B (2021) Forecast evaluation of quantiles, prediction intervals, and other set-valued functionals. Electronic J. Statist. 15(1):1034–1084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frongillo R, Kash IA (2015) Vector-valued property elicitation. Grünwald P, Hazan E, Kale S, eds. Proc. 28th Conf. Learn. Theory. PMLR, vol. 40 (PMLR.org), 710–727.Google Scholar
• Gneiting T (2011) Making and evaluating point forecasts. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(494):746–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T, Katzfuss M (2014) Probabilistic forecasting. Annu. Rev. Statist. Appl. 1:125–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T, Raftery AE (2007) Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102(477):359–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T, Ranjan R (2011) Comparing density forecasts using threshold-and quantile-weighted scoring rules. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(3):411–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneiting T, Ranjan R (2013) Combining predictive distributions. Electronic J. Statist. 7:1747–1782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y, Lichtendahl KC Jr, Jose VRR, Winkler RL (2017) Quantile evaluation, sensitivity to bracketing, and sharing business payoffs. Oper. Res. 65(3):712–728.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall SG, Mitchell J (2007) Combining density forecasts. Internat. J. Forecasting 23(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartigan JA (1975) Clustering Algorithms (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hartigan JA (1987) Estimation of a convex density contour in two dimensions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82(397):267–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hora SC, Kardeş E (2015) Calibration, sharpness and the weighting of experts in a linear opinion pool. Ann. Oper. Res. 229(1):429–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeon J, Taylor JW (2012) Using conditional kernel density estimation for wind power density forecasting. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 107(497):66–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jose VRR (2017) Percentage and relative error measures in forecast evaluation. Oper. Res. 65(1):200–211.Link, Google Scholar
• Jose VRR, Winkler RL (2009) Evaluating quantile assessments. Oper. Res. 57(5):1287–1297.Link, Google Scholar
• Komunjer I (2005) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation for conditional quantiles. J. Econometrics 128(1):137–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kong L, Mizera I (2012) Quantile tomography: Using quantiles with multivariate data. Statist. Sinica 22(4):1589–1610.Google Scholar
• Laio F, Tamea S (2007) Verification tools for probabilistic forecasts of continuous hydrological variables. Hydrology Earth System Sci. 11(4):1267–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert NS (2019) Elicitation and evaluation of statistical forecasts. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Lichtendahl KC Jr, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Winkler RL (2013) Is it better to average probabilities or quantiles? Management Sci. 59(7):1594–1611.Link, Google Scholar
• Lieb EH, Loss M (2001) Analysis. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 14 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI).Google Scholar
• Lions JL (1951) Supports de produits de composition. Les Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences 232(18):1622–1624.Google Scholar
• Makridakis S, Winkler RL (1983) Averages of forecasts: Some empirical results. Management Sci. 29(9):987–996.Link, Google Scholar
• Menardi G (2016) A review on modal clustering. Internat. Statist. Rev. 84(3):413–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moftakhari HR, Salvadori G, AghaKouchak A, Sanders BF, Matthew RA (2017) Compounding effects of sea level rise and fluvial flooding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(37):9785–9790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müller DW, Sawitzki G (1991) Excess mass estimates and tests for multimodality. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86(415):738–746.Google Scholar
• Newman JP, Maier HR, Riddell GA, Zecchin AC, Daniell JE, Schaefer AM, van Delden H, Khazai B, O’Flaherty MJ, Newland CP (2017) Review of literature on decision support systems for natural hazard risk reduction: Current status and future research directions. Environ. Model. Software 96:378–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parry M, Dawid AP, Lauritzen S (2012) Proper local scoring rules. Ann. Statist. 40(1):561–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton AJ (2012) A review of copula models for economic time series. J. Multivariate Anal. 110:4–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price K, Price B, Nantell TJ (1982) Variance and lower partial moment measures of systematic risk: Some analytical and empirical results. J. Finance 37(3):843–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rigollet P, Vert R (2009) Optimal rates for plug-in estimators of density level sets. Bernoulli 15(4):1154–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rinaldo A, Wasserman L (2010) Generalized density clustering. Ann. Statist. 38(5):2678–2722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rinaldo A, Singh A, Nugent R, Wasserman L (2012) Stability of density-based clustering. J. Machine Learn. Res. 13(April):905–948.Google Scholar
• Robert C, Casella G (2013) Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Salvadori G, Tomasicchio G, D’Alessandro F (2014) Practical guidelines for multivariate analysis and design in coastal and off-shore engineering. Coastal Engrg. 88:1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvadori G, Durante F, De Michele C, Bernardi M, Petrella L (2016) A multivariate copula-based framework for dealing with hazard scenarios and failure probabilities. Water Resources Res. 52(5):3701–3721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh A, Scott C, Nowak R (2009) Adaptive Hausdorff estimation of density level sets. Ann. Statist. 37(5B):2760–2782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soule D, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Merrick JR (2020) A heuristic for combining correlated experts when there is little data. Preprint, submitted October 13, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3680229.Google Scholar
• Steinwart I, Hush D, Scovel C (2005) A classification framework for anomaly detection. J. Machine Learn. Res. 6(February):211–232.Google Scholar
• Taylor JW, Jeon J (2018) Probabilistic forecasting of wave height for offshore wind turbine maintenance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 267(3):877–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tobias A, Brunnermeier MK (2016) CoVaR. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(7):1705–1741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Lichtendahl KC Jr, Jose VRR (2019) Probability forecasts and their combination: A research perspective. Decision Anal. 16(4):239–260.Link, Google Scholar
• Ye Y, Tse E (1989) An extension of Karmarkar’s projective algorithm for convex quadratic programming. Math. Programming 44(1):157–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuen R, Stoev S (2014) CRPS M-estimation for max-stable models. Extremes. 17(3):387–410.Crossref, Google Scholar