Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Distorted Expectations

References

• Acerbi C (2002) A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J. Banking Finance 26(7):1505–1518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. 34(1):199–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2001) Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization: Analysis, Algorithms, and Engineering Applications (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, den Hertog D, Vial J (2015) Deriving robust counterparts of nonlinear uncertain inequalities. Math. Programming 149:265–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, den Hertog D, De Waegenaere A, Melenberg B, Rennen G (2013) Robust solutions of optimization problems affected by uncertain probabilities. Management Sci. 59(2):341–357.Link, Google Scholar
• Benati S, Rizzi R (2007) A mixed integer linear programming formulation of the optimal mean/value-at-risk problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(1):423–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Doan XV, Natarajan K, Teo CP (2010) Models for minimax stochastic linear optimization problems with risk aversion. Math. Oper. Res. 35(3):580–602.Link, Google Scholar
• Belles-Sampera J, Guillen M, Santolino M (2014) Beyond value-at-risk: GlueVaR distortion risk measure. Risk Anal. 34(1):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belles-Sampera J, Guillen M, Santolino M (2016) What attitudes to risk underlie distortion risk measure choices? Insurance Math. Econom. 68:101–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billingsley P (1995) Probability and Measure (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Brighi B, Chipot M (1994) Approximated convex envelope of a function. SIAM J. Numerical Anal. 31(1):128–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai J, Liu H, Wang R (2018) Asymptotic equivalence of risk measures under dependence uncertainty. Math. Finance 28(1):29–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho TH (1994) Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. J. Risk Uncertainty 8(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, He S, Zhang S (2011) Tight bounds for some risk measures, with applications to robust portfolio selection. Oper. Res. 59(4):847–865.Link, Google Scholar
• Cont R, Deguest R, Scandolo G (2010) Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures. Quant. Finance 10(6):593–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornilly D, Vanduffel S (2019) Equivalent distortion risk measures on moment spaces. Statist. Probab. Lett. 146:187–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Li JYM (2018) Minimizing risk exposure when the choice of a risk measure is ambiguous. Management Sci. 64(1):327–344.Link, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.Link, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Arroyo S, Ye Y (2014) The value of stochastic modeling in two-stage stochastic programs with cost uncertainty. Oper. Res. 62(6):1377–1393.Link, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Guo S, Xu H (2022) Shortfall risk models when information of loss function is incomplete. Oper. Res. 70(6):3511–3518.Link, Google Scholar
• Denneberg D (1994a) Conditioning (updating) non-additive measures. Ann. Oper. Res. 52:21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denneberg D (1994b) Non-additive Measure and Integral (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Ghaoui L, Oks M, Oustry F (2003) Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach. Oper. Res. 51(4):543–556.Link, Google Scholar
• Escobar DD, Pflug GC (2020) The distortion principle for insurance pricing: Properties, identification and robustness. Ann. Oper. Res. 292:771–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esfahani PM, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstien metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171(1–2):115–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2002) Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stochastics 6(4):429–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo S, Xu H, Zhang S (2023) Utility preference robust optimization with moment-type information structure. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print May 17, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.2464.Google Scholar
• Hampel FR (1971) A general qualitative definition of robustness. Ann. Math. Statist. 42(6):1887–1896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanasusanto G, Roitch V, Kuhn D, Wiesemann W (2017) Ambiguous joint chance constraints under mean and dispersion information. Oper. Res. 65(3):751–767.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Guan Y (2016) Data-driven chance constrained stochastic program. Math. Programming 158(1–2):291–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin H, Zhou XY (2008) Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time. Math. Finance 18(3):385–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krätschmer V, Schied A, Zähle H (2014) Comparative and qualitative robustness for law-invariant risk measures. Finance Stochastics 18(2):271–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li JYM (2018) Closed-form solutions for worst-case law invariant risk measures with application to robust portfolio optimization. Oper. Res. 66(6):1533–1541.Link, Google Scholar
• Mak HY, Rong Y, Zhang J (2015) Appointment scheduling with limited distributional information. Management Sci. 61(2):316–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Merkle M, Marinescu D, Merkle MMR, Monea M, Stroe M (2014) Lebesgue-Stieljes integral and Young’s inequality. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 8(1):60–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natarajan K, Sim M, Uichanco J (2010) Tractable robust expected utility and risk models for portfolio optimization. Math. Finance 20(4):695–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pesenti S, Wang Q, Wang R (2020) Optimizing distortion riskmetrics with distributional uncertainty, Preprint, submitted November 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04889.Google Scholar
• Pichler A, Xu H (2022) Quantitative stability analysis for minimax distributionally robust risk optimization. Math. Programming 191:47–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popescu I (2007) Robust mean-covariance solutions for stochastic optimization. Oper. Res. 51(1):98–112.Link, Google Scholar
• Postek K, Ben-Tal A, den Hertog D, Melenberg B (2018) Robust optimization with ambiguous stochastic constraints under mean and dispersion information. Oper. Res. 66(3):814–833.Link, Google Scholar
• Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1/2):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Fox CR (1995) Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. 102(2):269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Bignozzi V, Tsakanas A (2015) How superadditive can a risk measure be? SIAM J. Financial Math. 6(1):776–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Xu H (2020) Robust spectral risk optimization when information on risk spectrum is incomplete. SIAM J. Optim. 30(4):3198–3229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Sim M (2014) Distributionally robust convex optimization. Oper. Res. 62(6):1358–1376.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu G, Gonzalez R (1996) Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. 42(12):1676–1690.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu ZQ, Zhou XY (2013) Optimal stopping under probability distortion. Ann. Appl. Probab. 23(1):251–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaari ME (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55(1):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang W, Xu H (2016) Distributionally robust chance constraints for non-linear uncertainties. Math. Programming 155(1–2):231–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Shao H (2018) Closed-form solutions for extreme-case distortion risk measures and applications to robust portfolio management. Preprint, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn3103458.Google Scholar
• Zymler S, Kuhn D, Rustem B (2013a) Distributionally robust joint chance constraints with second-order moment information. Math. Programming 137(1–2):167–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zymler S, Kuhn D, Rustem B (2013b) Worst-case value-at-risk of non-linear portfolios. Management Sci. 59(1):172–188.Link, Google Scholar