Queueing Dynamics and State Space Collapse in Fragmented Limit Order Book Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.1989

References

  • Alfonsi A , Fruth A , Schied A (2010) Optimal execution strategies in limit order books with general shape functions. Quant. Finance 10:143–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allon G , Federgruen A (2007) Competition in service industries. Oper. Res. 55(1):37–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Avellaneda M , Reed J , Stoikov S (2011) Forecasting prices from level-i quotes in the presence of hidden liquidity. Algorithmic Finance 1(1):35–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barclay MJ , Hendershott T , McCormick TD (2003) Competition among trading venues: Information and trading on electronic communications networks. J. Finance 58:2637–2666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bassamboo A , Harrison JM , Zeevi A (2004) Dynamic routing in large call centers: Asymptotic analysis of an LP-based method. Oper. Res. 10:1074–1099.Google Scholar
  • Besbes O , Maglaras C (2009) Revenue optimization for a make-to-order queue in an uncertain market environment. Oper. Res. 57(6):1438–1450.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bessembinder H (2003) Quote-based competition and trade execution costs in NYSE listed stocks. J. Financial Econom. 70:385–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biais B , Bisière C , Spatt C (2010) Imperfect competition in financial markets: An empirical study of Island and Nasdaq. Management Sci. 56(12):2237–2250.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blanchet J , Chen X (2013) Continuous-time modeling of bid-ask spread and price dynamics in limit order books. Working paper, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  • Bouchaud J-P , Gefen Y , Potters M , Wyart M (2004) Fluctuations and response in financial markets: The subtle nature of ‘random’ price changes. Quant. Finance 4:176–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bramson M (1998) State space collapse with applications to heavy-traffic limits for multiclass queueing networks. Queueing Systems 30:89–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buti S , Rindi B , Wen Y , Werner IM (2011) Tick size regulation, intermarket competition and sub-penny trading. Working paper, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  • Cachon G , Harker P (2002) Competition and outsourcing with scale economies. Management Sci. 48:1314–1333.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caldentey R , Kaplan E , Weiss G (2009) Fcfs infinite bipartite matching of servers and customers. Adv. Appl. Probabilities 41(3):695–730.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y-J , Maglaras C , Vulcano G (2019) Design of an aggregated marketplace under congestion effects: Asymptotic analysis and equilibrium characterization. Sharing Economy (Springer, Cham), 217–248.Google Scholar
  • Cont R , De Larrard A (2013) Price dynamics in a markovian limit order market. SIAM J. Financial Math. 4(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cont R , Kukanov A (2013) Optimal order placement in limit order markets. Working paper, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  • Cont R , Stoikov S , Talreja R (2010) A stochastic model for order book dynamics. Oper. Res. 58:549–563.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Degryse H , de Jong F , van Kervel V (2011) The impact of dark trading and visible fragmentation on market quality. Working paper.Google Scholar
  • Dufour A , Engle RF (2000) Time and the price impact of a trade. J. Finance 55:2467–2498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foucault T , Menkveld AJ (2008) Competition for order flow and smart order routing systems. J. Finance 63:119–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foucault T , Kadan O , Kandel E (2005) Limit order book as a market for liquidity. Rev. Financial Stud. 18:1171–1217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatheral J (2010) No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact. Quant. Finance 10:749–759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glosten L (1994) Is the electronic order book inevitable? J. Finance 49:1127–1161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glosten L (1998) Competition, design of exchanges and welfare. Working paper, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  • Glosten LR (1987) Components of the bid/ask spread and the statistical properties of transaction prices. J. Finance 42:1293–1307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glosten LR , Milgrom PR (1985) Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. J. Financial Econom. 14:71–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffiths MD , Smith BF , Turnbull DAS , White RW (2000) The costs and the determinants of order aggressiveness. J. Financial Econom. 56:65–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo X , De Larrard A , Ruan Z (2013) Optimal placement in a limit order book. Theory Driven by Influential Applications, 191–200.Google Scholar
  • Gurvich I , Ward A (2014) On the dynamic control of matching queues. Stochastic Systems 4(2):479–523.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton JL (1979) Marketplace fragmentation, competition, and the efficiency of the stock exchange. J. Finance 34:171–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison JM (1988) Brownian models of queueing networks with heterogeneous customer populations. Fleming W, Lions PL, eds. Stochastic Differential Systems, Stochastic Control Theory and Applications, vol. 10 of Proc. IMA (Springer-Verlag, New York), 147–186.Google Scholar
  • Harrison JM (1995) Balanced fluid models of multiclass queueing networks: a heavy traffic conjecture. Kelly F, Williams R, eds. Stochastic Networks, vol. 71 of Proc. IMA (Springer-Verlag, New York), 1–20.Google Scholar
  • Harrison JM (2000) Brownian models of open processing networks: Canonical representation of workload. Ann. Appl. Probabilities 10:75–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison JM , Lopez MJ (1999) Heavy traffic resource pooling in parallel-server systems. Queueing Systems 33:339–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R , Haviv M (2003) To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatheway F (2015) Nasdaq access fee experiment. Technical report, Nasdaq, New York.Google Scholar
  • Hollifield B , Millerz RA , Sandas P (2004) Empirical analysis of limit order markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71:1027–1063.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holthausen RW , Leftwich RW , Mayers D (1990) Large-block transactions, the speed of response, and temporary and permanent stock-price effects. J. Financial Econom. 26:71–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman G , Stanzl W (2004) Price manipulation and quasi-arbitrage. Econometrica 72:1247–1275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B , Menkveld AJ (2011) Middlemen in limit-order markets. Working paper, New York University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  • Keim DB , Madhavan A (1998) The cost of institutional equity trades. Financial Anal. J. 54:50–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kukanov A , Maglaras C (2015) A limit order queue model with traders with heterogeneous behaviors. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Kurtz TG (1977/78) Strong approximation theorems for density dependent Markov chains. Stochastic Processes Appl. 6(3):223–240.Google Scholar
  • Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53:1315–1335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakner P , Reed J , Simatos F (2017) Scaling limit of a limit order book model via the regenerative characterization of lévy trees. Stochastic Systems 7(2):342–373.Google Scholar
  • Lakner P , Reed J , Stoikov S (2016) High frequency asymptotics for the limit order book. Market Microstructure and Liquidity 2(1):1650004.Google Scholar
  • Lariviere MA (2006) A note on probability distributions with increasing generalized failure rates. Oper. Res. 54(3):602–604.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lederer P , Li L (1997) Pricing, production, scheduling and delivery-time competition. Oper. Res. 45:407–420.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levhari D , Luski I (1978) Duopoly pricing and waiting lines. Eur. Econom. Rev. 11:17–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li L , Lee Y (1994) Pricing and delivery-time performance in a competitive environment. Management Sci. 40:633–646.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luski I (1976) On partial equilibrium in a queueing system with two servers. Rev. Econom. Stud. 43:519–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maglaras C , Moallemi C , Zheng H (2014) Optimal execution in a limit order book and an associated microstructure market impact model. Working paper, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  • Malinova K , Park A (2010) Liquidity, volume, and price behavior: The impact of order vs. quote based trading. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  • Mandelbaum A , Pats G (1995) State-dependent queues: Approximations and applications. Kelly F, Williams R, eds. Stochastic Networks, vol. 71 in Proc. IMA (Springer-Verlag, New York), 239–282.Google Scholar
  • Mendelson H , Whang S (1990) Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the m/m/1 queue. Oper. Res. 38(5):870–883.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Hara M , Ye M (2011) Is market fragmentation harming market quality? J. Financial Econom. 100(3):459–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obizhaeva A , Wang J (2006) Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics. Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Parlour CA , Seppi DJ (2008) Limit order markets: A survey. Boot AWA, Thakor AV, eds. Handbook of Financial Intermediation & Banking 5, 63–95.Google Scholar
  • Parlour CA (1998) Price dynamics in limit order markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 11:789–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearson P (2015) Takeways from the NASDAQ pilot program. Technical report, Investment Technology Group, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  • Plambeck EL , Ward AR (2006) Optimal control of a high-volume assemble-to-order system. Math. Oper. Res. 31(3):453–477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosu I (2009) A dynamic model of the limit order book. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:4601–4641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • So K (2000) Price and time competition for service delivery. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(4):392–409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sofianos G (1995) Specialist gross trading revenues at the New York Stock Exchange. Working paper, New York Stock Exchange, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  • Sofianos G , Xiang J , Yousefi A (2011) Smart order routing: All-in shortfall and optimal order placement. Technical report, Goldman Sachs, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  • Stolyar AL (2005) Optimal routing in output-queued flexible server systems. Probab. Engrg. Inform. Sci. 19:141–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Kervel V (2012) Liquidity: What you see is what you get? Working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Zak SH (2003) Systems and Control (Oxford University Press). Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.