Dual Moments and Risk Attitudes
Published Online:3 Feb 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.2040
References
- (2000) Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. 46(11):1497–1512.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Nonparametric risk management and implied risk aversion. J. Econometrics 94(1–2):9–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, Helsinki).Google Scholar
- (1971) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
- (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J. Econom. Theory 2(3):244–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Searching for the reference point. Mimeo, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- (1994) Linear measures, the Gini index, and the income-equality trade-off. J. Econom. Theory 64(2):443–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Attitudes toward risk: Theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India. Econom. J. 91(364):867–890.Google Scholar
- (2004) Four notions of mean preserving increase in risk, risk attitudes and applications to the rank-dependent expected utility model. J. Math. Econom. 40(5):547–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) More pessimism than greediness: A characterization of monotone risk aversion in the rank-dependent expected utility model. Econom. Theory 25:649–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) The principle of strong diminishing transfer. J. Econom. Theory 103(2):311–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) New measures for portfolio evaluation. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:2571–2606.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities. J. Econom. Theory 42(2):370–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Risk-aversion concepts in expected- and non-expected-utility models. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory 20:73–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Order Statistics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
- (1995) Making inequality comparisons when Lorenz curves intersect. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):980–986.Google Scholar
- (2006) Putting risk in its proper place. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):280–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Economic and Financial Decisions under Risk (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Risk apportionment: The dual story. J. Econom. Theory 185:104971.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Apportioning of risks via stochastic dominance. J. Econom. Theory 144(3):994–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Multiple risks and mean-variance preferences. Oper. Res. 57(5):1142–1154.Link, Google Scholar
- (1980) Increasing nth degree risk. Econom. Lett. 6(4):329–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Stochastic dominance and moments of distributions. Math. Oper. Res. 5(1):94–100.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) The comparative statics of changes in risk revisited. J. Econom. Theory 66(2):522–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Cumulative prospect theory in the laboratory: A reconsideration. Mimeo, Center for the Economic Analysis of Risk, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
- (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) The Ross characterization of risk aversion: Strengthening and extension. Econometrica 55(5):1139–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Increasing risk: Some direct constructions. J. Risk Uncertainty 14:103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) A behavioral analysis of stochastic reference dependence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(9):2760–2782.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Two-moment decision models and expected utility maximization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77(3):421–430.Google Scholar
- (1989) A note on stochastic dominance and inequality measures. J. Econom. Theory 49(2):314–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) A generalization of Pratt-Arrow measure to nonexpected-utility preferences and inseparable probability and utility. Management Sci. 49(8):1089–1104.Link, Google Scholar
- (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1/2):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) The logic of partial-risk aversion: Paradox lost. J. Risk Uncertainty 3(2):105–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Risk aversion in Quiggin and Yaari’s rank-order model of choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. 97(Supplement):143–159.Google Scholar
- (1981) Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and the large with applications. Econometrica 49(3):621–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1970) Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econom. Theory 2(3):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Risk aversion in RDEU. J. Math. Econom. 42(6):675–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Risk aversion in cumulative prospect theory. Management Sci. 54(1):208–216.Link, Google Scholar
- (1990) First order vs. second order risk aversion. J. Econom. Theory 51(1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The optimizer’s curse: Skepticism and postdecision surprise in decision analysis. Management Sci. 52(3):311–322.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. 42(12):1676–1690.Link, Google Scholar
- (1969) Some remarks on measures of risk aversion and on their uses. J. Econom. Theory 1(3):315–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Univariate and multivariate comparisons of risk aversion: A new approach. Heller WP, Starr RM, Starrett DA, eds. Uncertainty, Information, and Communication: Essays in Honor of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 3, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 173–188.Google Scholar
- (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55(1):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Stochastic dominance, mean variance, and Gini’s mean difference. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(1):178–185.Google Scholar

