Nonadditive Multiattribute Utility Functions for Portfolio Decision Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.2046

References

  • Abbas AE (2009) Multiattribute utility copulas. Oper. Res. 57(6):1367–1383.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Airoldi M, Morton A, Smith J, Bevan G (2011) Healthcare prioritisation at the local level: A socio-technical approach. Working paper, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  • Argyris N, Figueira J, Morton A (2011) Interactive multicriteria methods for portfolio decision analysis. Salo A, Keisler J, Morton A, eds. Portfolio Decision Analysis: Improved Methods for Resource Allocation (Springer, Berlin), pp. 107-130.Google Scholar
  • Argyris N, Morton A, Figueira J (2014) CUT: A multicriteria approach for concavifiable preferences. Oper. Res. 62(3):633–642.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barbati M, Greco S, Kadzinski M, Slowinski R (2018) Optimization of multiple satisfaction levels in portfolio decision analysis. Omega 78:192–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bordley RF, Kirkwood CW (2004) Multiattribute preference analysis with performance targets. Oper. Res. 52(6):823–835.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen RT, Smith J (2009) On the choice of baselines in multiattribute portfolio analysis: A cautionary note. Decision Anal. 6(4):256–262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. 27(4):810–822.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewing PL Jr, Tarantino W, Parnell GS (2006) Use of decision analysis in the army base realignment and closure (BRAC) 2005 military value analysis. Decision Anal. 3(1):33–49.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Farquhar PH (1975) A fractional hybercube decomposition theorem for multiattribute utility functions. Oper. Res. 23(5):941–967.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC (1965) Independence in utility theory with whole product sets. Oper. Res. 13(1):28–45.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC (1973) Bernoullian utilities for multiple-factor situations. Cochrane JL, Zeleny M, eds. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC), pp. 47-61.Google Scholar
  • Fliedner T, Liesiö J (2016) Adjustable robustness for multi-attribute project portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252(3):931–946.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golabi K, Kirkwood CW, Sicherman A (1981) Selecting a portfolio of solar energy projects using multiattribute preference theory. Management Sci. 27(2):174–189.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grushka-Cockayne Y, De Reyck B, Degraeve Z (2008) An integrated decision-making approach for improving european air traffic management. Management Sci. 54(8):1395–1409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gurgur C, Morley C (2008) Lockheed Martin Space Systems company optimizes infrastructure project-portfolio selection. Interfaces 38(4):251–262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Keller LR, Simon J (2019) Preference functions for spatial risk analysis. Risk Anal. 39(1):244–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinmuntz DN (2007) Resource allocation decisions. Edwards W, Miles RF, von Winterfeld D, eds. Advances in Decision Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York), 400–418.Google Scholar
  • Liesiö J (2014) Measurable multiattribute value functions for portfolio decision analysis. Decision Anal. 11(1):1–20.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liesiö J, Mild P, Salo A (2008) Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 190(3):679–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liesiö J, Punkka A (2014) Baseline value specification and sensitivity analysis in multiattribute project portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 237(3):946–956.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lopes Y, de Almeida A (2015) Assessment of synergies for selecting a project portfolio in the petroleum industry based on a multi-attribute utility function. J. Petroleum Sci. Engrg. 126:131–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lourenço JC, Morton A, Bana e Costa CA (2012) PROBE – A multicriteria decision support system for portfolio robustness evaluation. Decision Support Systems 54(1):534–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mild P, Liesiö J, Salo A (2015) Selecting infrastructure maintenance projects with robust portfolio modeling. Decision Support Systems 77:21–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montibeller G, Franco LA, Lord E, Inglesias A (2009) Structuring resource allocation decisions: A framework for building multi-criteria portfolio models with area-grouped options. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(3):846–856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montiel LV, Bickel JE (2014) A generalized sampling approach for multilinear utility functions given partial preference information. Decision Anal. 11(3):147–170.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morton A (2015) Measurement issues in the evaluation of projects in a project portfolio. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245(3):789–796.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morton A, Keisler JM, Salo A (2016) Multicriteria portfolio decision analysis for project selection. Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira J, eds. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (Springer, New York), pp. 1269-1298.Google Scholar
  • Parnell GS, Bennett GE, Engelbrecht JA, Szafranski R (2002) Improving resource allocation within the national reconnaissance office. Interfaces 32(3):77–90.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips L, Bana e Costa CA (2007) Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Ann. Oper. Res. 154(1):51–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salo A, Keisler J, Morton A (2011) Portfolio Decision Analysis: Improved Methods for Resource Allocation (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon J, Kirkwood CW, Keller LR (2014) Decision analysis with geographically varying outcomes: Preference models and illustrative applications. Oper. Res. 62(1):182–194.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.