Placement Optimization in Refugee Resettlement

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.2093

References

  • Abdulkadiroğlu A , Sönmez T (2003) School choice: A mechanism design approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):729–747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ager A , Strang A (2008) Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. J. Refugee Stud. 21(2):166–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alcalde J , Barberà S (1994) Top dominance and the possibility of strategy-proof stable solutions to the marriage problem. Econom. Theory 4(3):417–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersson T , Ehlers L (2017) Assigning refugees to landlords in Sweden: Efficient, stable, and maximum matchings. Scandinavian J. Econom. 122(3):937–965.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersson T , Ehlers L , Martinello A (2018) Dynamic refugee matching. Technical report, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  • Åslund O , Fredriksson P (2009) Peer effects in welfare dependence quasi-experimental evidence. J. Human Resources 44(3):798–825.Google Scholar
  • Åslund O , Rooth DO (2007) Do when and where matter? Initial labour market conditions and immigrant earnings. Econom. J. (London) 117(518):422–448.Google Scholar
  • Åslund O , Östh J , Zenou Y (2010) How important is access to jobs? Old question, improved answer. J. Econom. Geography 10(3):389–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Åslund O , Edin PA , Fredriksson P , Grönqvist H (2011) Peers, neighborhoods, and immigrant student achievement: Evidence from a placement policy. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 3(2):67–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aziz H , Chen J , Gaspers S , Sun Z (2018) Stability and Pareto optimality in refugee allocation matchings. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents MultiAgent Systems (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC), 964–972.Google Scholar
  • Bansak K , Ferwerda J , Hainmueller J , Dillon A , Hangartner D , Lawrence D , Weinstein J (2018) Improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment. Science 359(6373):325–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barberà S , Jackson M (1995) Strategy-proof exchange. Econometrica 63(1):51–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besiou M , Van Wassenhove LN (2020) Humanitarian operations: A world of opportunity for relevant and impactful research. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):135–145.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Besiou M , Pedraza-Martinez AJ , Van Wassenhove LN (2018) OR applied to humanitarian operations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 269(2):397–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biró P , Gudmundsson J (2020) Complexity of finding Pareto-efficient allocations of highest welfare. Eur. J. Oper. Res. , ePub ahead of print, March 13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.018.Google Scholar
  • Bolt D (2018) An inspection of the vulnerable persons resettlement scheme. Technical report, Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, London, UK.Google Scholar
  • Cao W , Çelik M , Ergun Ö , Swann J , Viljoen N (2016) Challenges in service network expansion: An application in donated breastmilk banking in South Africa. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. 53:33–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castles S , Korac M , Vasta E , Vertovec S (2002) Integration: Mapping the field. Technical report, Centre for Migration and Policy Research and Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  • Çelik M , Ergun Ö , Johnson B , Keskinocak P , Lorca Á , Pekgün P , Swann J (2012) Humanitarian logistics. Mirchandani PB, ed. New Directions in Informatics, Optimization, Logistics, and Production, INFORMS Tutorials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Cantonsville, MD), 18–49.Google Scholar
  • COIN-OR (2020) CBC user guide. Accessed March 18, 2020, http://www.coin-or.org/cbc.Google Scholar
  • Damm AP (2014) Neighborhood quality and labor market outcomes: Evidence from quasi-random neighborhood assignment of immigrants. J. Urban Econom. 79:139–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delacrétaz D , Kominers SD , Teytelboym A (2019) Matching mechanisms for refugee resettlement. Technical report, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  • Edin PA , Fredriksson P , Åslund O (2003) Ethnic enclaves and the economic success of immigrants—evidence from a natural experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):329–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferwerda J , Gest J (2017) Location, location: Refugee resettlement and employment outcomes in the United States. Technical report, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
  • Fréville A (2004) The multidimensional 0–1 knapsack problem: An overview. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 155(1):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gurobi (2020) Gurobi Optimizer 9.0.0 Reference Manual (Gurobi Optimization, Inc., Houston, TX).Google Scholar
  • Hifi M , Michrafy M , Sbihi A (2004) Heuristic algorithms for the multiple-choice multidimensional knapsack problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(12):1323–1332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson MP , Midgley G , Chichirau G (2018) Emerging trends and new frontiers in community operational research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 268(3):1178–1191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones W , Teytelboym A (2017a) The international refugee match: A system that respects refugees’ preferences and the priorities of states. Refugee Survey Quart. 36(2):84–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones W , Teytelboym A (2017b) The local refugee match: Aligning refugees’ preferences with the capacities and priorities of localities. J. Refugee Stud. 31(2):152–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lichtenstein G , Puma J , Engelman A , Miller M (2016) The Refugee Integration Survey Evaluation Project (RISE) year five: Final report. Technical Report, Colorado Office of Economic Security, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  • Martello S , Toth P (1980) Solution of the zero-one multiple knapsack problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 4(4):276–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meignan D , Knust S , Frayret JM , Pesant G , Gaud N (2015) A review and taxonomy of interactive optimization methods in operations research. ACM Trans. Interactive Intelligent Systems 5(3):1–43 (TiiS).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell S , O’Sullivan M , Dunning I (2020) PuLP: A linear programming toolkit for Python. Accessed March 18, 2020, https://github.com/coin-or/pulp.Google Scholar
  • Moraga JFH , Rapoport H (2014) Tradable immigration quotas. J. Public Econom. 115:94–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nguyen T , Nguyen H , Teytelboym A (2019) Stability in matching markets with complex constraints. Proc. 2019 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 61–61 .Google Scholar
  • Olberg N , Seuken S (2019) Enabling trade-offs in machine learning-based matching for refugee resettlement. Technical report, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
  • Patacchini E , Zenou Y (2012) Ethnic networks and employment outcomes. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 42(6):938–949.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pedraza-Martinez AJ , Van Wassenhove LN (2016) Empirically grounded research in humanitarian operations management: The way forward. J. Oper. Management 45(1):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ronacher A (2020) Flask (Python microframework). Accessed March 18, 2020, https://palletsprojects.com/p/flask/.Google Scholar
  • Roth AE (1982) The economics of matching: Stability and incentives. Math. Oper. Res. 7(4):617–628.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE (2016) Who Gets What—And Why: Understand the Choices You Have, Improve the Choices You Make (William Collins, London, UK).Google Scholar
  • Roth AE (2018) Marketplaces, markets, and market design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(7):1609–1658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE , Sönmez T , Ünver MU (2004) Kidney exchange. Quart. J. Econom. 119:457–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slaugh VW , Akan M , Kesten O , Ünver MU (2016) The Pennsylvania Adoption Exchange improves its matching process. Interfaces 46(2):133–153.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song Y , Zhang C , Fang Y (2008) Multiple multidimensional knapsack problem and its applications in cognitive radio networks. MILCOM 2008-2008 IEEE Military Comm. Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–7.Google Scholar
  • Sönmez T (1999) Strategy-proofness and essentially singled-valued cores. Econometrica 67(3):677–689.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • SOU (2018) Ett ordnat mottagande–Gemensamt ansvar för etablering eller återvändande. Statens Offentliga Utredningar, SOU . 2018, report 22 (Stockholm).Google Scholar
  • Trapp AC , Teytelboym A , Ahani N , Andersson T (2018) Refugee resettlement via machine learning and integer optimization. OR60 Annual Conf.–Keynote Papers Extended Abstr. (The OR Society Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK), 21–26.Google Scholar
  • UNHCR (2019a) Global resettlement needs 2020. Technical report, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  • UNHCR (2019b) Global trends: Forced displacement in 2018. Technical report, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees/Headquarters.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of State (2020) Refugee arrivals by state and nationality as of March 6, 2020. Accessed March 18, 2020, http://www.wrapsnet.org/admissions-and-arrivals.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.