Assortment Optimization Under the Multinomial Logit Model with Utility-Based Rank Cutoffs

References

• Alba JW, Hutchinson JW (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. 13(4):411–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews RL, Srinivasan TC (1995) Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data. J. Marketing Res. 32(1):30–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aouad A, Farias V, Levi R (2020) Assortment optimization under consider-then-choose choice models. Management Sci. 32(1):30–41.Google Scholar
• Aouad A, Farias V, Levi R, Segev D (2018) The approximability of assortment optimization under ranking preferences. Oper. Res. 66(6):1661–1669.Link, Google Scholar
• Aouad A, Feldman J, Segev D, Zhang DJ (2019) Click-based MNL: Algorithmic frameworks for modeling click data in assortment optimization. Technical report, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• Beggs S, Cardell S, Hausman J (1981) Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. J. Econometrics 17(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berbeglia G, Joret G (2020) Assortment optimisation under a general discrete choice model: A tight analysis of revenue-ordered assortments. Algorithmica 82:681–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanchet J, Gallego G, Goyal V (2016) A Markov chain approximation to choice modeling. Oper. Res. 64(4):886–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Vanhonacker WR (1996) Limited choice sets, local price response, and implied measures of price competition. J. Marketing Res. 33(2):163–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bront JJM, Mendez Diaz I, Vulcano G (2009) A column generation algorithm for choice-based network revenue management. Oper. Res. 57(3):769–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis JM, Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under variants of the nested logit model. Oper. Res. 62(2):250–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Desir A, Goyal V (2014) Near-optimal algorithms for capacity constrained assortment optimization. Technical report, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Feldman J, Topaloglu H (2018) Technical note: Capacitated assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with nested consideration sets. Oper. Res. 66(2):380–391.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Li A (2017) Attention, consideration then selection choice model. Technical report, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Iyengar G, Phillips R, Dubey A (2004) Managing flexible products on a network. Technical report, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Gaundry MJI, Dagenais MG (1979) The dogit model. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 13(2):105–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gensch DH (1987) A two-stage disaggregate attribute choice model. Marketing Sci. 6(3):223–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Hanemann WM (1984) Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica 52(3):541–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR (2014) Consideration-set heuristics. J. Bus. Res. 67(8):1688–1699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jagabathula S, Rusmevichientong P (2017) A nonparametric joint assortment and price choice model. Management Sci. 63(9):3128–3145.Link, Google Scholar
• Jagabathula S, Vulcano G (2018) A partial-order-based model to estimate individual preferences using panel data. Management Sci. 64(4):1609–1628.Link, Google Scholar
• Jagabathula S, Mitrofanov D, Vulcano G (2020) Inferring consideration sets from sales transaction data. Technical report, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(5):1449–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamishima T (2018) Sushi preference datasets. Accessed January 8, 2021, https://www.kamishima.net/sushi/.Google Scholar
• McCarthy PS (1997) The role of captivity in aggregate share models of intercity passenger travel. J. Transport Econom. Policy 31(3):293–308.Google Scholar
• McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econometrics 15:447–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2003) Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. 22(1):58–84.Link, Google Scholar
• Mendez-Diaz I, Bront JJM, Vulcano G, Zabala P (2014) A branch-and-cut algorithm for the latent-class logit assortment problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 164(1):246–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. 63(2):81–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts JH, Lattin JM (1991) Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):429–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (1998) Modeling Bounded Rationality (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Shen Z-JM, Shmoys DB (2010) Dynamic assortment optimization with a multinomial logit choice model and capacity constraint. Oper. Res. 58(6):1666–1680.Link, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Shmoys DB, Tong C, Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with random choice parameters. Production Oper. Management 23(11):2023–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sumida M, Gallego G, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H, Davis JM (2020) Revenue-utility tradeoff in assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with totally unimodular constraints. Management Sci. 67(5):2845–2869.Link, Google Scholar
• Swait J, Ben-Akiva M (1987) Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 21(2):91–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait JD 1984. Probabilistic choice set generation in transportation demand models. Unpublished PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Talluri K, van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Vulcano G, van Ryzin G, Chaar W (2010) OM practice – Choice-based revenue management: An empirical study of estimation and optimization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):371–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Vulcano G, van Ryzin GJ, Ratliff R (2012) Estimating primary demand for substitutable products from sales transaction data. Oper. Res. 60(2):313–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang R (2019) Customer choice with consideration set: Threshold Luce model. Technical report, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
• Wang R, Sahin O (2018) The impact of consumer search cost on assortment planning and pricing. Management Sci. 64(8):3649–3666.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H (2020) Assortment optimization under the paired combinatorial logit model. Oper. Res. 68(3):741–761.Link, Google Scholar