Dynamic Development Contests

References

• Ales L, Cho SH, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho SH, Körpeoğlu E (2021) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. Production Oper. Management 30(6):1772–1784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M (2010) Information feedback in a dynamic tournament. Games Econom. Behav. 70(2):242–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Morris S (2019) Information design: A unified perspective. J. Econom. Lit. 57(1):44–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):339–356.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Bonatti A, Horner J (2011) Collaborating. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):632–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Candogan O (2020) Information Design in Operations. Pushing the Boundaries: Frontiers in Impactful OR/OM Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 176–201.Google Scholar
• Candoğan ST, Korpeoglu CG, Tang CS (2020) Team collaboration in innovation contests. Working Paper, University College London.Google Scholar
• Cao D (2014) Racing under uncertainty: Boundary value problem approach. J. Econom. Theory 151:508–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Mihm J, Schlapp J (2022) Sourcing innovation: Integrated system or individual components? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):1056–1073.Link, Google Scholar
• CNN (2022a) US is increasing pace of hypersonic weapons development to chase China and Russia, senior admiral says. Accessed January 23, 2023, https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/20/politics/us-hypersonic-china-russia-competition/index.html.Google Scholar
• CNN (2022b) US tested hypersonic missile in mid-March but kept it quiet to avoid escalating tensions with Russia. Accessed January 24, 2023, https://edition.cnn.com/2022/04/04/politics/us-hypersonic-missile-test/index.html?msclkid=d7d42ea0b4eb11ecba9bbe0f20c9485f.Google Scholar
• CRS Report (2022) Intellectual property and technical data in DOD acquisitions. Accessed January 24, 2023, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12083.Google Scholar
• CRS Report (2023) Hypersonic weapons: Background and issues for congress. Accessed January 24, 2023, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45811.Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, Stiglitz J (1980) Uncertainty, industrial structure, and the speed of R&D. Bell J. Econom. 11(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Véricourt F, Gurkan H, Wang S (2021) Informing the public about a pandemic. Management Sci. 67(10):6350–6357.Link, Google Scholar
• DOD News (2021) Defense official says hypersonics are vital to modernization strategy, battlefield dominance. Accessed June 28, 2021, https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/2593029/.Google Scholar
• Drakopoulos K, Jain S, Randhawa R (2021) Persuading customers to buy early: The value of personalized information provisioning. Management Sci. 67(2):828–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Ederer F (2010) Feedback and motivation in dynamic tournaments. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(3):733–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely JC (2017) Beeps. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(1):31–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely JC, Georgiadis G, Khorasani S, Rayo L (2023) Optimal feedback in contests. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2370–2394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C, Markovich S (2010) Patents, imitation and licensing in an asymmetric dynamic R&D race. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(2):113–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Levine DK (2009) Reputation and Equilibrium Selection in Games with a Patient Player. A Long-Run Collaboration on Long-Run Games (World Scientific, Singapore), 123–142.Google Scholar
• Goltsman M, Mukherjee A (2011) Interim performance feedback in multistage tournaments: The optimality of partial disclosure. J. Labor Econom. 29(2):229–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Porteus EL (1995) Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Sci. 41(9):1431–1447.Link, Google Scholar
• Halac M, Kartik N, Liu Q (2017) Contests for experimentation. J. Political Econom. 125(5):1523–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris C, Vickers J (1987) Racing with uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horner J, Skrzypacz A (2017) Learning, Experimentation, and Information Design, Econometric Society Monographs, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Hu M, Wang L (2021) Joint vs. separate crowdsourcing contests. Management Sci. 67(5):2711–2728.Link, Google Scholar
• INSIDE EVs (2021) EV battery makers are competing for tesla 4680 cell contract. Accessed January 24, 2023, https://insideevs.com/news/520142/tesla-4680-cell-battery-competition/.Google Scholar
• Judd BKL, Schmedders K, Yeltekin Ş (2012) Optimal rules for patent races. Internat. Econom. Rev. 53(1):23–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E (2019) Bayesian persuasion and information design. Annual Rev. Econom. 11:249–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E, Gentzkow M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2590–2615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khorasani S, Nittala L, Krishnan V (2020) Curated contests. Working Paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Khorasani S, Nittala L, Krishnan V (2023) Screening in multistage contests. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoğlu E, Tunç S (2021) Optimal duration of innovation contests. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):657–675.Link, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Cho SH (2018) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Korpeoglu CG, Hafalir IE (2022) Parallel innovation contests. Oper. Res. 70(3):1506–1530.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Eppinger SD, Whitney DE (1997) A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. 43(4):437–451.Link, Google Scholar
• Küçükgül C, Özer Ö, Wang S (2022) Engineering social learning: Information design of time-locked sales campaigns for online platforms. Management Sci. 68(7):4899–4918.Link, Google Scholar
• Larson E, Gray C (2014) Project Management: The Managerial Process 6e (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Lee T, Wilde LL (1980) Market structure and innovation: A reformulation. Quart. J. Econom. 94(2):429–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemus J, Marshall G (2021) Dynamic tournament design: Evidence from prediction contests. J. Political Econom. 129(2):383–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loury GC (1979) Market structure and innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 93:395–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576.Link, Google Scholar
• Mostagir M, Chen Y, Yeckehzaare I (2021) Information provision in dynamic contests: An experimental study. Working Paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
• Nittala L, Erat S, Krishnan V (2022) Designing internal innovation contests. Production Oper. Management 31(5):1963–1976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlov D, Skrzypacz A, Zryumov P (2020) Persuading the principal to wait. J. Political Econom. 128(7):2542–2578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry M, Vincent DR (2002) The optimal timing of procurement decisions and patent allocations. Internat. Econom. Rev. 43(4):1035–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayo L (2013) Monopolistic signal provision. B. E. J. Theor. Econom. 13(1):27–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayo L, Segal I (2010) Optimal information disclosure. J. Political Econom. 118(5):949–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlapp J, Mihm J (2018) Optimal stochastic feedback in asymmetric dynamic contests. Preprint, submitted March 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3134386.Google Scholar
• Shalpegin T, Sommer SC, Van Delft C (2020) Supplier collaboration in collaborative product development with internal competition. Working Paper, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
• Stalk G (1988) Time-the next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 66:41–51.Google Scholar
• Stouras KI, Erat S, Lichtendahl KC Jr (2020) Prizes on crowdsourcing platforms: An equilibrium analysis of competing contests. Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Econom. Computat. (ACM, New York), 875–876.Google Scholar
• Stouras KI, Hutchison-Krupat J, Chao RO (2022) The role of participation in innovation contests. Management Sci. 68(6):4135–4150.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor CR (1995) Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):872–890.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• The Washington Post (2022) Hypersonic weapons: Who has them and why it matters. Accessed January 24, 2023, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/hypersonic-weapons-who-has-them-and-why-it-matters/2022/04/05/1f6d0280-b557-11ec-8358-20aa16355fb4_story.html.Google Scholar