Personalized Pricing and Assortment Optimization Under Consumer Choice Models with Local Network Effects

References

• Anderson SP, de Palma A, Thisse J (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aydin G, Ziya S (2009) Personalized dynamic pricing of limited inventories. Oper. Res. 57(6):1523–1531.Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bloch F, Quérou N (2013) Pricing in social networks. Games Econom. Behav. 80:243–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Candogan O, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2012) Optimal pricing in networks with externalities. Oper. Res. 60(4):883–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen N, Chen Y (2021) Duopoly competition with network effects in discrete choice models. Oper. Res. 69(2):545–559.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Golrezaei N, Susan F (2022a) Fair assortment planning. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Chen X, Gao J, Ge D, Wang Z (2022b) Bayesian dynamic learning and pricing with strategic customers. Production Oper. Management 31(8):3125–3142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Owen Z, Pixton C, Simchi-Levi D (2022c) A statistical learning approach to personalization in revenue management. Management Sci. 68(3):1923–1937.Link, Google Scholar
• Conn AR, Scheinberg K, Vicente LN (2009) Introduction to Derivative-Free Optimization (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai M, Yang Z, Zhang Q, Zhu QJ (2016) Optimal trend following trading rules. Math. Oper. Res. 41(2):626–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Du C, Cooper W, Wang Z (2016) Optimal pricing for a multinomial logit choice model with network effects. Oper. Res. 64(2):441–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Du C, Cooper W, Wang Z (2018) Optimal worst-case pricing for a logit demand model with network effects. Oper. Res. Lett. 46(3):345–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fainmesser I, Galeotti A (2016) Pricing network effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(1):165–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng Q, Wang Z (2023) Dynamic multinomial logit choice model with network effect. Proc. 19th Conf. Web Internet Econom. (Springer, Switzerland), 684–685.Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2014) Constrained assortment optimization for the nested logit model. Management Sci. 60(10):2583–2601.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2019) Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golrezaei N, Nazerzadeh H, Rusmevicheintong P (2014) Real-time optimization of personalized assortments. Management Sci. 60(6):1532–1551.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Wang Z, Feng Y (2020) Information disclosure and pricing policies for sales of network goods. Oper. Res. 68(4):1162–1177.Link, Google Scholar
• Ioannides Y (2013) From Neighborhoods to Nations: The Economics of Social Interaction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Jackson M (2010) Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson M, Zenou Y (2015) Games on networks. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 95–163.Google Scholar
• Jackson M, Rogers B, Zenou Y (2017) The economic consequences of social-network structure. J. Econom. Literature 55(1):49–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karp RM (1991) An introduction to randomized algorithms. Discrete Appl. Math. 34(1):165–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z (2007) A single-period assortment optimization model. Production Oper. Management 16(3):369–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu W, Sahin O, Wang R (2023) A simple way toward fair assortment planning: Algorithms and welfare implications. Working paper, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• Motwani R, Raghavan P (1995) Randomized Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosrat F, Cooper WL, Wang Z (2021) Pricing for a product with network effects and multiple demand segments. Naval Res. Logist. 68(2):159–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Omdia (2021) iPhone 11 the world’s most shipped smartphone in 2020. Accessed November 5, 2024, https://omdia.tech.informa.com/pr/2021-feb/iphone-11-the-worlds-most-shipped-smartphone-in-2020.Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Shen Z-JM, Shmoys DB (2010) Dynamic assortment optimization with a multinomial logit choice model and capacity constraint. Oper. Res. 58(6):1666–1680.Link, Google Scholar
• Rusmevichientong P, Shmoys D, Tong C, Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with random choice parameters. Production Oper. Management 23(11):2023–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sturt B (2023) The value of robust assortment optimization under ranking-based choice models. Working paper, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
• Sumida M, Gallego G, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H, Davis J (2021) Revenue-utility tradeoff in assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with totally unimodular constraints. Management Sci. 67(5):2845–2869.Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri K, van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Tarski A (1955) A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pacific J. Math. 5(2):285–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Wang Z (2017) Consumer choice models with endogenous network effects. Management Sci. 63(11):3944–3960.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Heikki P, Wiesemann W (2024) Randomized assortment optimization. Oper. Res. 72(5):2042–2060.Google Scholar
• Ye H-Q, Yao DD (2010) Utility-maximizing resource control: Diffusion limit and asymptotic optimality for a two-bottleneck model. Oper. Res. 58(3):613–623.Link, Google Scholar