Portfolio Selection, Periodic Evaluations and Risk Taking

References

• Barberis N, Huang M (2008a) Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):2066–2100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M (2008b) The loss aversion/narrow framing approach to the equity premium puzzle. Mehra R, ed. Handbook of the Equity Risk Premium (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 199–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2012) Realization utility. J. Financial Econom. 104(2):251–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M, Thaler RH (2006) Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1069–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basak S, Pavlova A, Shapiro A (2007) Optimal asset allocation and risk shifting in money management. Rev. Financial Stud. 20(5):1583–1621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou R (2000) Unequal societies: Income distribution and the social contract. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):96–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkelaar AB, Kouwenberg R, Post T (2004) Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(4):973–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bichuch M, Sturm S (2014) Portfolio optimization under convex incentive schemes. Finance Stochastics 18(4):873–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booij AS, Van Praag BM, Van De Kuilen G (2010) A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population. Theory Decision 68:115–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buraschi A, Kosowski R, Sritrakul W (2014) Incentives and endogenous risk taking: A structural view on hedge fund alphas. J. Finance 69(6):2819–2870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter JN (2000) Does option compensation increase managerial risk appetite? J. Finance 55(5):2311–2331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Li Z, Zeng Y, Sun J (2017) Asset allocation under loss aversion and minimum performance constraint in a DC pension plan with inflation risk. Insurance Math. Econom. 75:137–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Huang C-F (1989) Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process. J. Econom. Theory 49(1):33–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Giorgi EG, Legg S (2012) Dynamic portfolio choice and asset pricing with narrow framing and probability weighting. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 36(7):951–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Zheng H (2019) Optimal investment of dc pension plan under short-selling constraints and portfolio insurance. Insurance Math. Econom. 85:47–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Zheng H (2020) Optimal investment with s-shaped utility and trading and value at risk constraints: An application to defined contribution pension plan. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 281(2):341–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo J, He XD (2021) A new preference model that allows for narrow framing. J. Math. Econom. 95:102470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He XD, Yang L (2019) Realization utility with adaptive reference points. Math. Finance 29(2):409–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He XD, Zhou XY (2011) Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: An analytical treatment. Management Sci. 57(2):315–331.Link, Google Scholar
• He XD, Zhou XY (2014) Myopic loss aversion, reference point, and money illusion. Quant. Finance 14(9):1541–1554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodder JE, Jackwerth JC (2007) Incentive contracts and hedge fund management. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 42(4):811–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingersoll JE, Jin LJ (2013) Realization utility with reference-dependent preferences. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(3):723–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin H, Zhou XY (2008) Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time. Math. Finance 18(3):385–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Sugden R (2005) Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environ. Resource Econom. 32(1):161–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):363–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karatzas I, Lehoczky JP, Shreve SE (1987) Optimal portfolio and consumption decisions for a “small investor” on a finite horizon. SIAM J. Control Optim. 25(6):1557–1586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouwenberg R, Ziemba WT (2007) Incentives and risk taking in hedge funds. J. Banking Finance 31(11):3291–3310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramkov D, Schachermayer W (1999) The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9(3):904–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy H, Levy M (2004) Prospect theory and mean-variance analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. 17(4):1015–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):41–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Wang MC, Zhao L (2010) Narrow framing: Professions, sophistication, and experience. J. Futures Markets 30(3):203–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RC (1969) Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. Rev. Econom. Statist. 51(3):247–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RC (1971) Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. J. Econom. Theory 3(4):373–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mrkva K, Johnson EJ, Gächter S, Herrmann A (2020) Moderating loss aversion: Loss aversion has moderators, but reports of its death are greatly exaggerated. J. Consumer Psych. 30(3):407–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panageas S, Westerfield MM (2009) High-water marks: High risk appetites? Convex compensation, long horizons, and portfolio choice. J. Finance 64(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pliska SR (1986) A stochastic calculus model of continuous trading: Optimal portfolios. Math. Oper. Res. 11(2):371–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Read D (2007) Experienced utility: Utility theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman. Thinking Reasoning 13(1):45–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reichlin C (2013) Utility maximization with a given pricing measure when the utility is not necessarily concave. Math. Financial Econom. 7(4):531–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers LCG (2013) Optimal Investment (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruß J, Schelling S (2018) Multi cumulative prospect theory and the demand for cliquet-style guarantees. J. Risk Insurance 85(4):1103–1125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Cui X, Yao J, Li D (2015) Dynamic trading with reference point adaptation and loss aversion. Oper. Res. 63(4):789–806.Link, Google Scholar
• Sokol-Hessner P, Hsu M, Curley NG, Delgado MR, Camerer CF, Phelps EA (2009) Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals’ loss aversion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(13):5035–5040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3):183–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainity 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vieider FM (2009) The effect of accountability on loss aversion. Acta Psych. (Amsterdam) 132(1):96–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wen JF, Gordon DV (2014) An empirical model of tax convexity and self-employment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(3):471–482.Crossref, Google Scholar