Post-trade Netting and Contagion

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.0800

References

  • Amini H, Feinstein Z (2023) Optimal network compression. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 306(3):1439–1455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amini H, Minca A (2020) Clearing financial networks: Impact on equilibrium asset prices and seniority of claims. Pushing the Boundaries: Frontiers in Impactful or/OM Research, INFORMS TutORials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 154–175.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amini H, Filipović D, Minca A (2016) To fully net or not to net: Adverse effects of partial multilateral netting. Oper. Res. 64(5):1135–1142.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bardoscia M, Ferrara G, Vause N, Yoganayagam M (2019) Full payment algorithm. Preprint, submitted March 22, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3344580.Google Scholar
  • Bardoscia M, Ferrara G, Vause N, Yoganayagam M (2021) Simulating liquidity stress in the derivatives market. J. Econom. Dynamic Control 133:104215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • BCBS, IOSCO (2020) Margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives. Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  • Biagini F, Fouque JP, Frittelli M, Meyer-Brandis T (2019) A unified approach to systemic risk measures via acceptance sets. Math. Finance 29(1):329–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bisias D, Flood M, Lo AW, Valavanis S (2012) A survey of systemic risk analytics. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 4(1):255–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Börner L, Hatfield JW (2017) The design of debt-clearing markets: Clearinghouse mechanisms in preindustrial Europe. J. Political Econom. 125(6):1991–2037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csóka P, Herings PJJ (2018) Decentralized clearing in financial networks. Management Sci. 64(10):4681–4699.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • D’Errico M, Roukny T (2021) Compressing over-the-counter markets. Oper. Res. 69(6):1660–1679.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duffie D (2018) Financial regulatory reform after the crisis: An assessment. Management Sci. 64(10):4835–4857.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duffie D, Zhu H (2011) Does a central clearing counterparty reduce counterparty risk? Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 1(1):74–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg L, Noe TH (2001) Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Sci. 47(2):236–249.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • ESMA (2020a) Consultation paper: Report on post trade risk reduction services with regards to the clearing obligation (EMIR Article 85(3a)). Report, European Securities and Markets Authority, Paris.Google Scholar
  • ESMA (2020b) Report to the European Commission: Report on post trade risk reduction services with regards to the clearing obligation (EMIR Article 85(3a)). Report, European Securities and Markets Authority, Paris.Google Scholar
  • ESRB (2017) The macroprudential use of margins and haircuts. Report, European Systemic Risk Board, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
  • ESRB (2020) ESRB opinion on ESMA’s report on post trade risk reduction services with regards to the clearing obligation (Article 85(3a) EMIR). Report, European Systemic Risk Board, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
  • FCA (2024) Consultation on the derivatives trading obligation and post-trade risk reduction services. Consultation Paper CB24/14 by the Financial Conduct Authority. Financial Conduct Authority, London.Google Scholar
  • Feinstein Z, Rudloff B, Weber S (2017) Measures of systemic risk. SIAM J. Financial Math. 8(1):672–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Föllmer H, Weber S (2015) The axiomatic approach to risk measures for capital determination. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 7(1):301–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glasserman P, Young HP (2015) How likely is contagion in financial networks? J. Banking Finance 50:383–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glasserman P, Moallemi CC, Yuan K (2016) Hidden illiquidity with multiple central counterparties. Oper. Res. 64(5):1143–1158.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • IOSCO (2024) Final report on post trade risk reduction services: Sound practices for consideration. Final report FR/10/2024, International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), Madrid.Google Scholar
  • ISDA (2022) ISDA letter on EMIR review. Accessed October 12, 2025, https://www.isda.org/a/UE5gE/ISDA-Letter-on-EMIR-Review.pdf. Google Scholar
  • ISDA, EBF, ICMA, ISLA (2018) EMIR REFIT: Incentivising post-trade risk reduction. https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Repo/PTRR-Whitepaper-090418.pdf.Google Scholar
  • O’Kane D (2017) Optimising the multilateral netting of fungible OTC derivatives. Quant. Finance 17(10):1523–1534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paddrik M, Rajan S, Young HP (2020) Contagion in derivatives markets. Management Sci. 66(8):3603–3616.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers LCG, Veraart LAM (2013) Failure and rescue in an interbank network. Management Sci. 59(4):882–898.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schuldenzucker S, Seuken S (2018) Portfolio compression in financial networks: Incentives and systemic risk. Preprint, submitted March 8, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135960.Google Scholar
  • Tarski A (1955) A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pacific J. Math. 5(2):285–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veraart LAM (2020) Distress and default contagion in financial networks. Math. Finance 30(3):705–737.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veraart LAM (2022) When does portfolio compression reduce systemic risk? Math. Finance 32(3):727–778.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.