Strategic Workforce Planning Under Uncertainty

References

• Abernathy WJ, Baloff N, Hershey JC, Wandel S (1973) A three-stage manpower planning and scheduling model—a service-sector example. Oper. Res. 21(3):693–711.Link, Google Scholar
• Arlotto A, Chick SE, Gans N (2014) Optimal hiring and retention policies for heterogeneous workers who learn. Management Sci. 60(1):110–129.Link, Google Scholar
• Aumann RJ, Serrano R (2008) An economic index of riskiness. J. Polit. Econom. 116(5):810–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartholomew DJ, Forbes AF, McClean SI (1991) Statistical Techniques for Manpower Planning, 2nd ed. (Wiley, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2001) Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization: Analysis, Algorithms, and Engineering Applications, MOS-SIAM Series on Optimization (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bres ES, Burns D, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1980) A goal programming model for planning officer accessions. Management Sci. 26(8):773–783.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Sim M (2008) Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Management Sci. 55(1):71–84.Link, Google Scholar
• Burke EK, De Causmaecker P, Berghe GV, Van Landeghem H (2004) The state of the art of nurse rostering. J. Scheduling 7:441–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buyens D, De Vos A (2001) Perceptions of the value of the HR function. Human Resource Management J. 11(3):70–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper W (1963) Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints. Oper. Res. 11(1):18–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung SH, Jung DC, Yoon SN, Lee DH (2010) A dynamic forecasting model for nursing manpower requirements in the medical service industry. Service Bus. 4:225–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CVX Research (2012) CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.0. Accessed October 5, 2020, http://cvxr.com/cvx.Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Harris J, Shapiro J (2010) Competing on talent analytics. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88(10):52–58.Google Scholar
• Davis MJ, Lu Y, Sharma M, Squillante MS, Zhang Bo (2018) Stochastic optimization models for workforce planning, operations, and risk management. Service Sci. 10(1):40–57.Link, Google Scholar
• De Feyter T, Guerry M-A, Komarudin (2017) Optimizing cost-effectiveness in a stochastic Markov manpower planning system under control by recruitment. Ann. Oper. Res. 253(1):117–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimitriou VA, Georgiou AC, Tsantas N (2013) The multivariate non-homogeneous Markov manpower system in a departmental mobility framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228:112–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn J (1981) A dynamic programming model of fractional flows with application to maintenance and replacement problems. Math. Oper. Res. 6(3):405–419.Link, Google Scholar
• Fry MJ, Magazine MJ, Rao US (2006) Firefighting staffing including temporary absences and wastage. Oper. Res. 54(2):353–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Gans N, Zhou Y-P (2002) Managing learning and turnover in employee staffing. Oper. Res. 50(6):991–1006.Link, Google Scholar
• Georgiou AC, Tsantas N (2002) Modelling recruitment training in mathematical human resource planning. Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Indust. 18(1):53–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guerry M-A, De Feyter T (2012) Optimal recruitment strategies in a multi-level manpower planning model. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63:931–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iverson RD (1999) An event history analysis of employee turnover: The case of hospital employees in Australia. Human Resource Management Rev. 9(4):397–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalamatianou AG (1987) Attainable and maintainable structures in Markov manpower systems with pressure in the grades. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 38(2):183–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Mehrotra S (2015) A two-stage stochastic integer programming approach to integrated staffing and scheduling with application to nurse management. Oper. Res. 63(6):1431–1451.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuwaiti AA, Raman V, Subbarayalu AV, Palanivel RM, Prabaharan S (2016) Predicting the exit time of employees in an organization using statistical model. Internat. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 5(12):213–217.Google Scholar
• Lim AEB, Shanthikumar JG (2007) Relative entropy, exponential utility, and robust dynamic pricing. Oper. Res. 55(2):198–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Lusby R, Dohn A, Range TM, Larsen J (2012) A column generation-based heuristic for rostering with work patterns. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63(2):261–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marler JH, Boudreau JW (2017) An evidence-based review of HR analytics. Internat. J. Human Resource Management 28(1):3–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehlmann A (1980) An approach to optimal recruitment and transition strategies for manpower systems using dynamic programming. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 31(11):1009–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles L, Emre Y, Russell B, Vielma JP (2016) Extended formulations in mixed-integer convex programming. Louveaux Q, Skutella M, eds. Integer Programming Combinatorial Optim. 18th Internat. Conf. IPCO 2016 Proc. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 102–113.Google Scholar
• MOSEK ApS (2019) MOSEK Fusion API for Python 9.0. Accessed October 5, 2020, https://docs.mosek.com/9.0/pythonfusion/index.html.Google Scholar
• Nembhard DA, Bentefouet F (2012) Parallel system scheduling with general worker learning and forgetting. Internat. J. Production Econom. 139(2):533–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nilakantan K, Raghavendra BG (2008) Length of service and age characteristics in proportionality Markov manpower systems. IMA J. Management Math. 19(3):245–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S-H, Lee SM, Yoon SN, Yeon S-J (2008) A dynamic manpower forecasting model for the information security industry. Indust. Management Data Systems 108(3):368–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul C, Mitlacher L (2008) Expanding risk management systems: Human resources and German banks. Strategic Change 17(1-2):21–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perelman BS, Dorton SL, Harper S (2019) Identifying consensus in heterogeneous multidisciplinary professional teams. 2019 IEEE Conf. Cognitive Comput. Aspects Situation Management CogSIMA (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 127–133.Google Scholar
• Price WL, Piskor WG (1972) The application of goal programming to manpower planning. INFOR Inform. Systems Oper. Res. 10(3):221–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao PP (1990) A dynamic programming approach to determine optimal manpower recruitment policies. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 41(10):983–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roos NP, Fransoo R, Bogdanovic B, Carriere KC, Frohlich N, Friesen D, Patton D, Wall R (1999) Needs-based planning for generalist physicians. Med. Care 37(6):206–228.Google Scholar
• Şenerdem BH (2001) The determination of optimal time-in-grade for promotion at each rank in the Turkish Army. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
• Shafer SM, Nembhard DA, Uzumeri MV (2001) The effects of worker learning, forgetting, and heterogeneity on assembly line productivity. Management Sci. 47(12):1639–1653.Link, Google Scholar
• Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27:379–423, 623–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sing C-P, Love PED, Tam CM (2012) Multiplier model for forecasting manpower demand. J. Construction Engrg. Management 138(10):1161–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song H, Huang H-C (2008) A successive convex approximation method of multistage workforce capacity planning problem with turnover. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 188:29–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich D, Dulebohn J (2015) Are we there yet? What’s next for HR? Human Resource Management Rev. 25(2):188–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich D, Brockbank W, Younger J, Ulrich M (2012) HR from the Outside In: Six Competencies for the Future of Human Resources(McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Valeva S, Hewitt M, Thomas BW (2017) A matheuristic for workforce planning with employee learning and stochastic demand. Internat. J. Production Res. 55(24):7380–7397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waltz F (1967) An engineering approach: Hierarchical optimization criteria. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 12(2):179–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan Z, Gao SY, Teo CP (2018) On the design of sparse but efficient structures in operations. Management Sci. 64(7):3421–3445.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Sherali HD (2009) Two-stage workforce planning under demand fluctuations and uncertainty. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 60(1):94–103.Crossref, Google Scholar