Objective Selection for Cancer Treatment: An Inverse Optimization Approach

References

• Ahuja R, Orlin J (2001) Inverse optimization. Oper. Res. 49(5):771–783.Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldi E, Kann V (1998) On the approximability of minimizing nonzero variables or unsatisfied relations in linear systems. Theoretical Comput. Sci. 209(1):237–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• American Cancer Society (2018) Cancer Facts & Figures 2018. Accessed December 22, 2021, https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2018/cancer-facts-and-figures-2018.pdf.Google Scholar
• Aswani A, Shen ZJM, Siddiq A (2018) Inverse optimization with noisy data. Oper. Res. 66(3):870–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Babier A, Boutilier JJ, McNiven AL, Chan TCY (2018) Knowledge-based automated planning for oropharyngeal cancer. Medical Phys. 45(7):2875–2883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazán FSV, Francisco JB (2009) An improved fixed-point algorithm for determining a Tikhonov regularization parameter. Inverse Problems 25(4):045007.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Gupta V, Paschalidis IC (2015) Data-driven estimation in equilibrium using inverse optimization. Math. Programming 153(2):595–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bortfeld T (1999) Optimized planning using physical objectives and constraints. Seminars Radiation Oncology 9(1):20–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boutilier JJ, Lee T, Craig T, Sharpe MB, Chan TCY (2015) Models for predicting objective function weights in prostate cancer IMRT. Medical Phys. 42(4):1586–1595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breedveld S, Storchi PRM, Keijzer M, Heijmen BJM (2006) Fast, multiple optimizations of quadratic dose objective functions in IMRT. Phys. Medical Biology 51:3569–3579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton D, Toint PL (1992) On an instance of the inverse shortest paths problem. Math. Programming 53(1):45–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Lee T (2018) Trade-off preservation in inverse multi-objective convex optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 270(1):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Lee T, Terekhov D (2019) Inverse optimization: Closed-form solutions, geometry, and goodness of fit. Management Sci. 65(3):1115–1135.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan T, Craig T, Lee T, Sharpe M (2014) Generalized inverse multiobjective optimization with application to cancer therapy. Oper. Res. 62(3):680–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandrashekar G, Sahin F (2014) A survey on feature selection methods. Comput. Electrical Engrg. 40:16–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chanyavanich V, Das SK, Lee WR, Lo JY (2011) Knowledge-based IMRT treatment for prostate cancer. Medical Phys. 38:2515–2522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi B, Deasy JO (2002) The generalized equivalent uniform dose function as a basis for intensity-modulated treatment planning. Phys. Medical Biology 47(20):3579–3589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cotrutz C, Lahanas M, Kappas C, Baltas D (2001) A multiobjective gradient-based dose optimization algorithim for external beam conformal radiotherapy. Phys. Medical Biology 46:2161–2175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craft D (2011) A guide to using multi-criteria optimization (MCO) for IMRT planning in Raystation. Technical report, Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Craft D, Halabi T, Shih HA, Bortfeld T (2007) An approach for practical multiobjective IMRT treatment planning. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biology Phys. 69(5):1600–1607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craft DL, Hong TS, Shih HA, Bortfeld TR (2012) Improved planning time and plan quality through multicriteria optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biology Phys. 82(1):e83–e90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das A, Kempe D (2011) Submodular meets spectral: Greedy algorithms for subset selection, sparse approximation and dictionary selection. Proc. 28th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., (Omnipress, Madison, WI), 1057–1064.Google Scholar
• Deasy JO, Blanco AI, Clark VH (2003) CERR: A computational environment for radiotherapy research. Medical Phys. 30(5):979–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deasy J, Lee E, Bortfeld T, Langer M, Zakarian K, Alaly J, Zhang Y, et al. (2006) A collaboratory for radiation therapy treatment planning optimization research. Ann. Oper. Res. 148(1):55–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duan Z, Wang L (2011) Heuristic algorithms for the inverse mixed integer linear programming problem. J. Global Optim. 51:463–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrgott M (2005) Multicriteria Optimization, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Esfahani PM, Shafieezadeh-Abadeh S, Hanasusanto GA, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven inverse optimization with imperfect information. Math. Programming 167(1):191–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eskelinen P, Miettinen K (2012) Trade-off analysis approach for interactive nonlinear multiobjective optimization. OR Spectrum 34(4):803–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fréchet MM (1906) Sur quelques points du calcul fonctionnel. Rendiconti Circolo Matematico Palermo (1884-1940) 22(1):1–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galatsanos NP, Katsaggelos AK (1992) Methods for choosing the regularization parameter and estimating the noise variance in image restoration and their relation. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 1(3):322–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gebken B, Peitz S (2021) Inverse multiobjective optimization: Inferring decision criteria from data. J. Global Optim. 80:3–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodall C (1991) Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 53(2):285–321.Google Scholar
• Gottlieb J, Puchta M, Solnon C (2003) A study of greedy, local search, and ant colony optimization approaches for car sequencing problems. Cagnoni S, Romero Cardalda JJ, Corne DW, Gottlieb J, Guillot A, Hart E, Johnson CG, et al., eds. Applications of Evolutionary Computing (Springer, Berlin), 246–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guyon I, Elisseeff A (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Machine Learning Res. 3:1157–1182.Google Scholar
• Halabi T, Craft D, Bortfeld T (2006) Dose-volume objectives in multi-criteria optimization. Phys. Medical Biology 51:3809–3818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar G, Kang W (2005) Inverse conic programming with applications. Oper. Res. Lett. 33:319–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jekel CF, Venter G, Venter MP, Stander N, Haftka RT (2018) Similarity measures for identifying material parameters from hysteresis loops using inverse analysis. Internat. J. Materials Forming 12(3):355–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kearney V, Chan JW, Haaf S, Descovich M, Solberg TD (2018) DoseNet: A volumetric dose prediction algorithm using 3d fully convolutional neural networks. Phys. Medical Biology 63(23):235022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keshavarz A, Wang Y, Boyd S (2011) Imputing a convex objective function. Proc. IEEE Internat. Sympos. on Intelligent Control, 613–619.Google Scholar
• Krause A, Singh A, Guestrin C (2008) Near-optimal sensor placement in Gaussian processes: Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies. J. Machine Learning 9:235–284.Google Scholar
• Lamperski JB, Schaefer AJ (2015) A polyhedral characterization of the inverse-feasible region of a mixed-integer program. Oper. Res. Lett. 43(6):575–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee T, Hammad M, Chan TCY, Craig T, Sharpe MB (2013) Predicting objective function weights from patient anatomy in prostate IMRT treatment planning. Medical Phys. 40(12):121706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim L, Sepulchre R, Ye K (2019) Geometric distance between positive definite matrices of different dimensions. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 65(9):5401–5405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin JG (2005) On min-norm and min-max methods of multi-objective optimization. Math. Programming 103:1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmood R, Babier A, McNiven A, Diamant A, Chan TCY (2018) Automated treatment planning in radiation therapy using generative adversarial networks. Doshi-Velez F, Fackler J, Jung K, Kale D, Ranganath R, Wallace B, Wiens J, eds. Proc. 3rd Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference, vol. 85, 484–499.Google Scholar
• Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML (2011) Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2010. J. National Cancer Inst. 103(2):117–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martí R (2015) Black-box solvers in combinatorial optimization. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, 2.Google Scholar
• McIntosh C, Purdie TG (2016) Voxel-based dose prediction with multi-patient atlas selection for automated radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys. Medical Biology 62:415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore KL, Brame RS, Low DA, Mutic S (2011) Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biology Phys. 81(2):545–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naghavi M, Foroughi AA, Zarepisheh M (2019) Inverse optimization for multi-objective linear programming. Optim. Lett. 13(2):281–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemhauser G, Wolsey L, Fisher M (1978) An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions: I. Math. Programming 14(1):265–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niemierko A (1997) Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: A concept of equivalent uniform dose. Medical Phys. 24(1):103–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nimerierko A (1999) A generalized concept of equivalent uniform dose. Medical Phys. 26:1100.Google Scholar
• Pudil P, Novovičová J, Kittler J (1994) Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognition Lett. 15(11):1119–1125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romeijn HE, Dempsey JF, Li JG (2004) A unifying framework for multi-criteria fluence map optimization models. Phys. Medical Biology 49(10):1991–2013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romeijn HE, Ahuja RK, Dempsey JF, Kumar A (2006) A new linear programming approach to radiation therapy treatment planning problems. Oper. Res. 54(2):201–216.Link, Google Scholar
• Saeys Y, Inza IN, Larrañaga P (2007) A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 23(19):2507–2517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaefer AJ (2009) Inverse integer programming. Optim. Lett. 3(4):483–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shamaiah M, Banerjee S, Vikalo H (2010) Greedy sensor selection: Leveraging submodularity. Proc. 49th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 2572–2577.Google Scholar
• Shao L, Ehrgott M (2008) Approximately solving multiobjective linear programmes in objective space and an application in radiotherapy treatment planning. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 68(2):257–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard DM, Ferris MC, Olivera GH, Mackie TR (1999) Optimizing the delivery of radiation therapy to cancer patients. SIAM Rev. 41(4):721–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thieke C, Bortfield T, Küfer K (2002) Characterization of dose distributions through the max and mean dose concept. Acta Oncology (Madrid) 41(2):158–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Haveren R, Breedveld S, Keijzer M, Voet P, Heijmen B, Ogryczak W (2017) Lexicographic extension of the reference point method applied in radiation therapy treatment planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 263(1):247–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L (2009) Cutting plane algorithms for the inverse mixed integer linear programming problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 37(2):114–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilkens JJ, Alaly JR, Zakarian K, Thorstad WL, Deasy JO (2007) IMRT treatment planning based on prioritizing prescription goals. Phys. Medical Biology 52(6):1675–1692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Mohan R, Niemierko A, Schmidt-Ullrich R (2002) Optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans based on the equivalent uniform dose. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biology Phys. 52(1):224–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu B, Ricchetti F, Sanguineti G, Kazhdan M, Simari P, Chuang M, Taylor R, et al. (2009) Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. Medical Phys. 36(12):5497–5505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu B, Ricchetti F, Sanguineti G, Kazhdan M, Simari P, Jacques R, Taylor R, et al.. (2011) Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biology Phys. 79(4):1241–1247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xing L, Li JG, Donaldson S, Le QT, Boyer AL (1999) Optimization of importance factors in inverse planning. Phys. Medical Biology 44(10):2525–2536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu Z (1996) Calculating some inverse linear programming problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 72(2):261–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li X, Quan EM, Pan X, Li Y (2011) A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer. Phys. Medical Biology 56:3873–3893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang X, Dong L, Liu H, Mohan R (2006) A sensitivity-guided algorithm for automated determination of IMRT objective function parameters. Medical Phys. 33(8):2935–2944.Crossref, Google Scholar