Naive Learning Through Probability Overmatching

References

• Acemoglu D, Dahleh MA, Lobel I, Ozdaglar A (2011) Bayesian learning in social networks. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(4):1201–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arieli I, Babichenko Y, Shlomov S (2021) Virtually additive learning. J. Econom. Theory 197:105322.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1958) Utilities, attitudes, choices: A review note. Econometrica 26(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benaïm M (1998) Recursive algorithms, urn processes and chaining number of chain recurrent sets. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 18(1):53–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benaïm M, Weibull JW (2003) Deterministic approximation of stochastic evolution in games. Econometrica 71(3):873–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénézit F, Thiran P, Vetterli M (2009) Interval consensus: From quantized gossip to voting. 2009 IEEE Internat. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 3661–3664.Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory Soc. 14(6):723–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhar AG, Larreguy H, Xandri JP (2020) Testing models of social learning on networks: Evidence from two experiments. Econometrica 88(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Hirshleifer D, Subrahmanyam A (2002) Investor psychology and security market under- and overreaction. Adv. Behav. Finance 53(6):460–501. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0022-1082.00077.Google Scholar
• De Bondt WFM, Thaler R (1985) Does the stock market overreact? J. Finance 40(3):793–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Degroot MH (1974) Reaching a consensus. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69(345):118–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards W (1961) Probability learning in 1000 trials. J. Experiment. Psych. 62(4):385–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Haruvy E (2016) Learning and the economics of small decisions. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 638–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galton F (1907) Vox populi. Nature 75:450–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golub B, Jackson MO (2010) Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 2(1):112–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartman P (2002) Ordinary Differential Equations, 2nd ed. (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hazla J, Jadbabaie A, Mossel E, Amin Rahimian M (2021) Bayesian decision making in groups is hard. Oper. Res. 69(2):632–654.Link, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP (1997) Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market: The case of UK residential estate agents. J. Management Stud. 34(6):921–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofbauer J, Sandholm WH (2002) On the global convergence of stochastic fictitious play. Econometrica 70(6):2265–2294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huf JO, Huff AS, Thomas H (1992) Strategic renewal and the interaction of cumulative stress and inertia. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):55–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kempe D, Dobra A, Gehrke J (2003) Gossip-based computation of aggregate information. Proc. 44th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 482–491.Google Scholar
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S (2018) Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision-making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1031–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leshem A, Scaglione A (2018) The impact of random actions on opinion dynamics. IEEE Trans. Signal Inform. Processing Networks 4(3):576–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mossel E, Schoenebeck G (2009) Reaching consensus on social networks. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
• Mossel E, Sly A, Tamuz O (2015) Strategic learning and the topology of social networks. Econometrica 83(5):1755–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller-Frank M, Neri C (2021) A general analysis of boundedly rational learning in social networks. Theoret. Econom. 16(1):317–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers JL (2014) Probability learning and sequence learning. WK Estes, ed. Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes (Psychology Press, Hove, UK), 171–205.Google Scholar
• Okonofua EC, Simpson KN, Jesri A, Rehman SU, Durkalski VL, Egan BM (2006) Therapeutic inertia is an impediment to achieving the healthy people 2010 blood pressure control goals. Hypertension 47(3):345–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LS, Branch Jr WT, Cook CB, Doyle JP, El-Kebbi IM, Gallina DL, Miller CD, Ziemer DC, Barnes CS (2001) Clinical inertia. Ann. Internal Medicine 135(9):825–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitz GF (1969) An inertia effect (resistance to change) in the revision of opinion. Canadian J. Psych./Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 23(1):24–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reger RK, Palmer TB (1996) Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organ. Sci. 7(1):22–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth G, Sandholm WH (2013) Stochastic approximations with constant step size and differential inclusions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51(1):525–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulze C, van Ravezwaaij D, Newell BR (2013) Match me if you can: How smart choices are fueled by competition. Proc. Annual Meeting Cognitive Sci. Soc. 35:3372–3377.Google Scholar
• Vulkan N (2000) An economist’s perspective on probability matching. J. Econom. Surveys 14(1):101–118.Crossref, Google Scholar