Parallel Innovation Contests
Published Online:23 Feb 2022https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2250
References
- (2022) Learning to be creative: A mutually exciting spatio-temporal point process model for idea generation in open innovation. Inform. Systems Res. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Innovation and crowdsourcing contests. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 6 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 379–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. Production Oper. Management 30(6):1772–1784.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Consumption externality and yield uncertainty in the influenza vaccine supply chain: Interventions in demand and supply sides. Management Sci. 58(6):1072–1091.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Competition among contests. RAND J. Econom. 40(4):743–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) A pooling analysis of two simultaneous online auctions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(1):33–51.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):339–356.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) A designer’s choice between single-prize and parallel tournaments. Econom. Inquiry 54(4):1774–1789.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Team collaboration in innovation contests. Working paper, University College London.Google Scholar
- (2020) Innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):430–445.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2009) Cournot competition under yield uncertainty: The case of the U.S. influenza vaccine market. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(4):563–576.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions. Proc. 10th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, 119–128.Google Scholar
- Elanco (2017) Welcome to the Elanco Pavilion. Accessed February 17, 2017, https://www.innocentive.com/elanco-pavilion/.Google Scholar
- (1999) Auctioning entry into tournaments. J. Political Econom. 107(3):573–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
- GrandChallenges (2017) Grand challenges explorations round 20 rules & guidelines. Accessed January 10, 2018, https://gcgh.grandchallenges.org/sites/default/files/additional-materials/GCE_Rules_and_Guidelines_Round20.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2018) College admissions with entrance exams: Centralized vs. decentralized. J. Econom. Theory 176:886–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Pure strategy Nash equilibria in non-zero sum Colonel Blotto games. Internat. J. Game Theory 41(2):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Joint vs. separate crowdsourcing contests. Management Sci. 67(5):2711–2728.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Jack of all, master of some: Information network and innovation in crowdsourcing communities. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):389–410.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) The role of feedback in dynamic crowdsourcing contests: A structural empirical analysis. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
- (2012) The lifeboat problem. Eur. Econom. Rev. 56(3):552–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Optimal duration of innovation contests. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):657–675.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Conflicts with multiple battlefields. CESifo Working Paper Series, SSRN, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
- (2016) Optimizing product launches in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Sci. 62(6):1778–1799.Link, Google Scholar
- (1993) Mechanism design by competing sellers. Econometrica 61(6):1281–1312.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Incentives in new product development projects and the role of target costing. Management Sci. 56(8):1324–1344.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Designing internal innovation contests. Production Oper. Management., ePub ahead of print January 5, https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13659.Google Scholar
- (1981) Economies of scope. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(2):268–272.Google Scholar
- (1997) Competition among sellers who offer auctions instead of prices. J. Econom. Theory 75(1):141–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The Colonel Blotto game. Econom. Theory 29(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The non-constant-sum Colonel Blotto game. Econom. Theory 51:397–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) Increasing risk: I. A definition. Diamond P, Rothschild M, eds. Uncertainty in Economics (Academic Press, New York), 101–121.Google Scholar
- (2007) Stochastic Orders (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Dueling contests and platform’s coordinating role. Working paper, University College Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
- (2022) The role of participation in innovation contests. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Technology and Market Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (1995) Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):872–890.Google Scholar
- (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
- (1979) Multiproduct technology and market structure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 69(2):346–351.Google Scholar

